DYNAMICS OF MINERAL COMPOSITION OF PROPOLIS AT ITS INDUSTRIAL PROCESSING

Authors

  • Роман/Roman Владимирович/Vladimirowitsch Кайгородов/Kaigorodov Perm State University; Tobolsk complex scientific station of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Ирина/Irina Николаевна/Nikolaevna Карташова/Kartasheva Perm State University

Keywords:

mineral content, heavy metals, cleaning of raw propolis, propolis, processing products, processing waste

Abstract

The aim this study was analysis of mineral content of propolis with different botanical origin and this dynamics by industrial processing. In laboratory experiment was the scheme of industrial processing of propolis is reproduced. The samples of propolis from temperate zone collected from a poplar trees (Populus L.), propolis extracts and this waste were evaluated. Mineral composition was using optical emission spectroscopy with inductively coupled plasma (ICP OES) determined. The influence of botanical origin of propolis was established. Propolis from Populus nigra L. differed in higher mineral content, than propolis from a Populus tremula L. As the extracting substances were used the water distilled, 1 M solution of nitrate of ammonium and ethanol (30, 70 and 96%). It is revealed that the mineral composition of different fraction: water-soluble, salt-soluble, ethanolic-soluble of propolis extracts depends from type of extraction. It was showed that mineral content of propolis extract can be change using different extraction methods. The way of cleaning of raw materials of propolis of toxic elements lead and cadmium is offered based on ion-exchange processes with extraction using the ammonium nitrate solution. The received results can be used for optimization of industrial processing of propolis.

Author Biographies

  • Роман/Roman Владимирович/Vladimirowitsch Кайгородов/Kaigorodov, Perm State University; Tobolsk complex scientific station of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
    Candidate of biology, associate professor of the Department of Plant physiology and Microorganisms;Researcher of Laboratory of ecotoxicology
  • Ирина/Irina Николаевна/Nikolaevna Карташова/Kartasheva, Perm State University
    Student of Biological faculty

References

Вахонина ЕЛ. Совершенствование технологии производства и переработки прополиса: автореф. дис. ... канд. с.-х. наук. Рыбное, 2005. 19 с.

Bankova V.S., De Castro S.L., Marcucci М.С. Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin // Apidologie. 2000. Vol. 31. P. 3-15.

Bogdanov S. Bienenvolk und Schadstoflbelastung // Schweiz. Bienen-Zeitung. 1988. № 111(11). S. 571-575.

Bogdanov S., Kilchenmann V., Imdorf A. Acaricide residues in some bee products // Apiculture Research. 1998. № 37 (2). P. 57-67.

Budrock G.A. Review of the Biological Properties and Toxicity of Bee Propolis (Propolis) // Food and Chemical Toxicology. 1998. № 36. P. 347-363.

Finger D. et al. Propolis as an indicator of environmental contamination by metals // Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2014. Vol. 92(3). P. 259-264.

Fleche C. et al. Contamination des produits de la ruche et risques puor la santé humaine : situation in France // Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics). 1997. Vol. 16(2). S. 609-619.

Ghisalberti E.L. Propolis a review // Bee World. 1974. № 55. P. 59-84.

Greenaway W., Scaysbrook T., Whatley F.R. The compositions and plant origin of propolis: a report of work at Oxford// Bee World. 1990. №71. P. 107-118.

Marcucci M.C. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. // Apidologie. 1995. Vol. 26. P. 83-93.

Walker P., Crane E. Constituents propolis // Apidologie. 1987. №18. P. 327-334

References

Bankova VS., De Castro S.L., Marcucci M.C. Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie. 2000, V. 31, pp. 3-15.

Bogdanov S. Bienenvolk und Schadstoflbelastung Schweiz. Bienen-Zeitung. 1988, N 111(11), s. 571-575.

Bogdanov S., Kilchenmann V., Imdorf A. Acaricide residues in some bee products. Apiculture Research. 1998, N 37 (2), pp. 57- 67.

Budrock G.A. Review of the Biological Properties and Toxicity of Bee Propolis (Propolis). Food and Chemical Toxicology. 1998, N 36, pp. 347-363.

Finger D., Filho I.K., Torres Y.R., Quinaia S.P. Propolis as an indicator of environmental contamination by metals. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2014, V. 92(3), pp. 259-264.

Fleche C., Clement M.-E., Zeggane S., Faucon J.-P. Contamination des produits de la ruche et risques puor la santé humaine : situation in France. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics). 1997, V. 16(2), pp. 609-619.

Ghisalberti E.L. Propolis a review. Bee World. 1974, N 55, pp. 59-84.

Greenaway W., Scaysbrook T., Whatley F.R. The compositions and plant origin of propolis: a report of work at Oxford. Bee World. 1990, N 71, pp. 107-118.

Marcucci M.C. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie. 1995, V. 26, pp. 83-93.

Vachonina E. A. Soversenstvovanie technologii proiz-vodstva i pererabotki propolisa. Avtoref. diss, kand. s.-ch. nauk. [Improvement of technology of production and processing of propolis. Abstract PhD], Rybnoe, 2005. 19p.

Walker P., Crane, E. Constituents propolis. Apidologie. 1987, N 18, pp. 327-334

Downloads

Published

2018-10-23

How to Cite

DYNAMICS OF MINERAL COMPOSITION OF PROPOLIS AT ITS INDUSTRIAL PROCESSING. (2018). Bulletin of Perm University. Biology, 2, 102-108. https://press.psu.ru/index.php/bio/article/view/1797

Similar Articles

11-20 of 62

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.