Evaluating the Effect of Induced Immunosuppression on possible IVF Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9952-2026-2-225-236Keywords:
infertility, dexamethasone, immunosuppression, microbiome, indicators of cellular immunity, ovarian reserve, reproductive potential, reproductive capacity, embryotoxic effectAbstract
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is one of the assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) used to treat infertility. One in six couples worldwide experiences infertility, which leads to an increased utilization of assisted reproductive technologies. While the success of IVF depends on numerous factors, increasing attention has recently been focused on the role of the immune system. On the one hand, a certain level of immunosuppression is required for successful implantation, on the other hand, excessive immunosuppression may increase susceptibility to infections and inflammation, as well as the proliferation of opportunistic pathogens, which adversely affect embryo implantation and pregnancy progression. In clinical practice, low doses of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone are sometimes used to modulate the immune response; however, data regarding its direct effect on the embryo and reproductive potential are limited. Understanding the potential risks of dexamethasone use in IVF programs requires preclinical studies. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of low-dose dexamethasone on the reproductive tract microbiota and oocyte morphological characteristics using a laboratory animal model, and to correlate these changes with the dynamics of immunological parameters to assess the safety of drug utilization in IVF programs. Wistar rats of both sexes were used to create the biological model. Immunosuppression was induced via intraperitoneal administration of dexamethasone (Ellara, Russia) to female rats for three consecutive days. All animals in both the control and experimental groups underwent hormonal stimulation with Follimag and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) concurrently with dexamethasone administration. Biological samples were collected from the vagina and gut of the animals before and on the fourth day after dexamethasone administration. The obtained data demonstrated that against the background of immunosuppression, no statistically significant changes were detected in the abundance of most isolated microorganisms (Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Morganella morganii, Escherichia coli). The immune status of rats was assessed based on the relative and absolute lymphocyte counts in peripheral blood, as well as the phagocytic index of peripheral blood neutrophils. Consequently, the administration of a reasonable dose of dexamethasone to the animals resulted in a decrease in the absolute T-lymphocyte count, driven by a reduction in T-helper lymphocytes, as well as a decline in the phagocytic index. The potential outcome of in vitro fertilization in Wistar rats following dexamethasone administration was assessed based on ovarian reserve and reproductive capacity. The results showed that while administration of dexamethasone did not significantly affect oocyte quantitative characteristics, prominent morphological abnormalities were observed in these cells. Evaluation of the reproductive capacity of immunosuppressed female rats through mating with males demonstrated a 1.5-fold decrease in the number of offspring compared to animals without immunosuppression. The findings suggest that low-dose dexamethasone may exert a direct embryotoxic effect that is not mediated solely by immunosuppression, as manifested by impaired germ cell morphology and reduced reproductive capacity. The results of the study underscore the need for monitoring immunological parameters, controlling the reproductive tract microbiota, and substantiating the use of glucocorticoids in clinical IVF protocols, as well as the necessity for further preclinical studies to assess the risks of the drug's embryotoxic effect on oocytes.References
Список источников
1. Амян Т.С. и др. Особенности субпопуляционного состава лимфоцитов периферической крови с цитотоксической, киллерной и регуляторной функцией у женщин с повторными неудачами импланта-ции в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий // Акушерство и Гинекология. 2017. Т. 12. С. 78–83. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2017.12.78-83. EDN: ZWTPKD
2. Богачева Н.В. и др. Электростимулятор ректальный для эякуляции у животных. Патент на полез-ную модель RU 230453 U1, 04.12.2024. Заявка № 2024119277 от 10.07.2024. URL: https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2846746C1/ru. EDN: VQWXOI
3. Богачева Н.В. и др. Основные проблемы экспериментальных исследований новых иммунобио-логических препаратов на биологических моделях лабораторных животных // Вятский медицинский вестник. 2020. Т. 68, № 4. С. 74–81. DOI: 10.24411/2220-7880-2020-10135. EDN: ILDGWX
4. Богачева Н.В. и др. Способ расчета дозы дексаметазона для разработки биологической модели иммуносупрессии на мышах: Патент на изобретение RU 2748123 C1, 19.05.2021. Заявка № 2020126327 от 04.08.2020. URL: https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2748123C1/ru.
5. Богданова И.М., Артемьева К.А., Болтовская М.Н. Развитие и функция регуляторных В-клеток и их роль в поддержании беременности // Иммунология. 2021. Т. 42, № 4. С. 415–425. DOI: 10.33029/0206-4952-2021-42-4-415-425. EDN ZNQDGJ
6. Галкина Д.Е., Макаренко Т.А., Окладников Д.В. Иммунологические аспекты нормальной и пато-логически протекающей беременности // Вестник РАМН. 2022. Т. 77, № 1. С. 13–24. EDN: BHJEMU
7. Есина Е.В., Логина Н.Ю., Аляутдина О.С. Роль иммунных взаимодействий в развитии беспло-дия: обзор литературы // РМЖ. Мать и дитя. 2013. Т. 21, № 2. С. 44–48. URL: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/ginekologiya/Roly_immunnyh_vzaimodeystviy_v_razvitii_besplodiya_obzor_literatury/. EDN: PHTVES
8. Конкина А.В. и др. Иммунологическое тестирование при женском бесплодии: современный взгляд на проблему // Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция. 2024. Т. 18, № 4. С. 547–562. URL: https://www.gynecology.su/jour/article/view/2117/1237?locale=ru_RU. DOI: 10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.532. EDN: WFRBBO
9. Матвеева Л.В. и др. Иммунологическое прогнозирование эффективности вспомогательных ре-продуктивных технологий // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Медицина. 2023. Т. 27, № 3. С. 342–353. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/immunologicheskoe-prognozirovanie-effektivnosti-vspomogatelnyh-reproduktivnyh-tehnologi. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0245-2023-27-3-342-353. EDN: OLFHDI
10. Михалёва Л.М. и др. Повторные неудачи имплантации. Патогенез иммунологических наруше-ний в эндометрии // Доктор.Ру. 2022. Т. 21, № 1. С. 21–26. DOI: 10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-1-21-26. EDN: SBQUVT
11. Николаева А.В. и др. Современные представления о взаимосвязи кишечной и вагинальной микробиот // Акушерство и гинекология. 2021. № 9. С. 5–11. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2021.9.5-ll. EDN DMANXQ
12. Трунова О.А., Гюльмамедова И.Д. Иммуномодулирующая терапия у пациенток с привычной неэффективной имплантацией // Медицинский вестник Юга России. 2024. Т. 15, № 4. С. 79–89. DOI: 10.21886/2219-8075-2024-15-4-79-89. EDN: KOIAHV
13. Andreescu M. The impact of the use of immunosuppressive treatment after an embryo transfer in increasing the rate of live birth // Frontiers in Medicine. 2023. Vol. 10. P. 1–9. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1167876. EDN: GYXEBA
14. Andreescu M. et al. Recurrent abortion and the involvement of killer-cell immunoglobulin-like re-ceptor (KIR) genes, activated T cells, NK abnormalities, and cytokine profiles // J. Clin. Med. 2023. Vol. 12, № 4. Р. 1355–1369. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041355. EDN: BCSQDW
15. Alizadeh F. et al. Evaluating dexamethasone as an adjuvant in the antagonist protocol in PCOS pa-tientsundergoing IVF/ICSI: a randomized controlled trial // Reprod. Sci. 2025. Vol. 32, № 10. Р. 3343–3348. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-025-01895-7. EDN: GZPGLK
16. Dai M. et al. Roles of immune microenvironment in the female reproductive maintenance and regu-lation: novel insights into the crosstalk of immune cells // Frontiers in immunology. 2023. Vol. 14. P. 1–17. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1109122. EDN: LVQZII
17. Leroy C. et al. Immunosuppressive drugs and fertility // Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2015. Vol. 10. Art. 136. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-015-0332-8 EDN: EZLNHK
18. Ma J., Gao W., Li D. Recurrent implantation failure: A comprehensive summary from etiology to treatment // Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2023. Vol. 13. Art. 1061766. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1061766
19. Wang Z. et al. The frozen⁃thawed embryo transfer(FET)outcomes of the patients with repeated embryo implantation failure after intrauterine injection of dexamethasone sodium phosphate // The Jour-nal of Practical Medicine. 2021. Vol. 37, № 8. P. 1064–1067. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006
References
1. Amyan T.S., Krechetova L.V., Perminova S.G., Vtorushina V.V. [Features of the subpopulation com-position of peripheral blood lymphocytes with cytotoxic. killer and regulatory functions in women with repeated implantation failures in assisted reproductive technology programs]. Okušerstvo i Gynekologija. V. 12 (2017): pp. 78-83. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18565/aig2017.12.78-83.
2. Bogacheva N.V., Bogachev N.N., Dunaeva E.B., Khasanshina Z.R., Kozvonin V.A. [Rectal electrical stimulator for ejaculation in animals]. The patent is on the official website RU 230453 U1. 12/04/2024. Application No. 2024119277 dated 07/10/2024. (In Russ.). Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2846746C1/ru
3. Bogacheva N.V., Zaitseva I.V., Popova S.V., Korotaeva K.N. [Basic problems of experimental studies of new immunobiological preparations on biological models of laboratory animals]. Vjatskij medicinskij vestnik. V. 68, No. 4 (2020): pp. 74-81. (In Russ.). DOI 10.24411/2220-7880-2020-10135. EDN ILDGWX.
4. Bogacheva N.V., Popova S.V., Korotaeva K.N., Isaeva N.V. [Assistance in calculating the dose of ra-diomethasone for the development of a biotechnological model link to me]: Patent on the website RU 2748123 C1. 05/19/2021. Application No. 2020126327 dated 08/04/2020. (In Russ.). Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2748123C1/ru
5. Bogdanova I.M., Artemyeva K.A., Boltovskaya M.N. [The development and function of regulatory B cells and their role in maintaining pregnancy]. Immunologija. V. 42, No. 4 (2021): pp. 415-425. (In Russ.). DOI 10.33029/0206-4952-2021-42-4-415-425. EDN ZNQDGJ
6. Galkina D.E., Makarenko T.A., Okladnikov D.V. [Immunological aspects of normal and pathological-ly occurring pregnancy]. Vestnik RAMN. V. 77, No. 1 (2022): pp. 13-24. (In Russ.). EDN: BHJEMU
7. Esina E.V., LoginaN.Yu., Alyautdina O.S. [The role of immune interactions in the development of in-fertility: a review of the literature]. RMŽ. Mat’ i ditja. V. 21, No. 1 (2013): pp. 44-48. (In Russ.). EDN: PHTVES
8. Konkina A.V., Blikyan L.A., Aleynikova D.E. et al. [Immunological testing for female infertility: a modern view of the problem]. Akušerstvo, ginekologija i reprodukcija. V. 18, No. 4 (2024): pp. 547-562. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.532. EDN: WFRBBO
9. Matveeva L.V., Fominova G.V., Gromova E.V., Alyamkina E.A., Galynya A.S. [Immunological fore-casting of the effectiveness of assisted reproductive technologies]. Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Medicina. V. 27, No. 3 (2023): pp. 342-353. (In Russ.).
10. Mikhaleva L.M., Orazov M.R., Silantieva E.S., Kamilova D.P., MidiberK.Yu., Orekhov R.E. [Repea-ted implantation failures. Pathogenesis of immunological disorders in the endometrium]. Doktor.Ru. V. 21, No. 1 (2022): pp. 21-26. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-1-21-26. EDN: SBQUVT
11. Nikolaeva A.V., Kozlova A.A., Baranov I.I., Priputnevich T.V. [Current understanding of the rela-tionship between gut and vaginal microbiotas]. Akušerstvo i ginekologija. No. 9 (2021): pp. 5-11. (In Russ.). DOI 10.18565/aig.2021.9.5-ll. EDN DMANXQ
12. Trunova O.A., Gulmamedova I.D. [Immunomodulatory therapy in patients with habitual ineffective implantation]. Medicinskij vestnik Juga Rossii. V. 15, No. 4 (2024): pp. 79-89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21886/2219-8075-2024-15-4-79-89. EDN: KOIAHV
13. Andreescu M. The impact of the use of immunosuppressive treatment after an embryo transfer in increasing the rate of live birth. Frontiers in Medicine. V. 10 (2023): pp. 1-9. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1167876. EDN: GYXEBA
14. Andreescu M., Frincu F., Plotogea M., Mehedințu C. Recurrent abortion and the involvement of kill-er-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genes. activated T cells. NK abnormalities. and cytokine pro-files. J. Clin. Med. V. 12, No. 4 (2023): pp. 1355-1369. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041355. EDN: BCSQDW
15. Alizadeh F., Amirian M., Khadem N., Afiat M., Mahmoudinia M., Khales S.A. et al. Evaluating dex-amethasone as an adjuvant in the antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing IVF/ICSI: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Sci. V. 32, No. 10 (2025): pp. 3343-3348. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-025-01895-7. EDN: GZPGLK
16. Dai M., Xu Y., Gong G., Zhang Y. Roles of immune microenvironment in the female reproductive maintenance and regulation: novel insights into the crosstalk of immune cells. Frontiers in immunology. V. 14 (2023): pp. 1-17. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1109122. EDN: LVQZII
17. Leroy C., Rigot J.M., Leroy M., Decanter C., Le Mapihan K., Parent A.S. et al. Immunosuppressive drugs and fertility. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. V. 10 (2015). Art. 136. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-015-0332-8. EDN: EZLNHK
18. Ma J., Gao W., Li D. Recurrent implantation failure: A comprehensive summary from etiology to treatment. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne). V. 13 (2023). Art. 1061766. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1061766.
19. Wang Z.,Ren C.,Ren W., Shi H. The frozen⁃thawed embryo transfer(FET)outcomes of the patients with repeated embryo implantation failure after intrauterine injection of dexamethasone sodium phosphate. The Journal of Practical Medicine. V. 37, No. 8 (2021): pp. 1064-1067. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006