GEOPOLITICAL TURN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE CONCEPTUAL REVOLUTION OR CONTINUATION OF THE TRADITION?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-1-70-77

Keywords:

European Union; critical geopolitics; strategic sovereignty; strategic autonomy; resilience; orientalism; his-toricism; discourse

Abstract

The article focuses on the recent geopolitical turn in the EU policy. Conceptually it presupposes the introduction of two notions into the official discourse of Brussels – strategic sovereignty and strategic autonomy. This move caused ambivalent response: traditionally the EU denied geopolitical thinking, sovereignty and balance of power. Moreover, the very identity of the project was based on explicit opposition to those notions. The purpose of the article is to show that there is no contradiction between these two poles. Through the prism of critical geopolitics, the author studies the key EU foreign policy texts and reveals that the normative universalism of Brussels has always been expressed through a certain vision of political geography, namely, the spatially-temporal symbolic mapping. It contains three components. First, the metaphor of a «path» or a «way» that structures reality by placing phenomena and events one after another. Secondly, the model, which turns this path into an ideological vector. The EU presents itself as a model in the official discourse. Thirdly, the European Union places different countries and entire regions along this normative route. Geopolitical concepts of strategic sovereignty and autonomy do not contradict this pattern, but rather continue it at a new stage.

Author Biography

G. V. Kotsur, Saint Petersburg State University

Candidate in Political Sciences, Assistant of the Department of Theory and History of International Relations, School of International Relations

References

Романова, Т. А. (2017) ‘Категория «стрессоустойчивость» в Европейском союзе’, Современная Европа, 4 (76), сс. 17‒29. [Romanova, T. A. (2017) ‘The "Resilience" notion of the European Union’ [Kategorija “Stressoustojchivost'” v Evropejskom Sojuze], Sovremennaja Evropa, 4 (76), pр. 17‒29. (In Russ.)].

Романова, Т. А., Павлова, Е. Б. (2019) ‘Стрессоустойчивость в Евросоюзе и Россия: суть и перспективы новой концепции’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 63(6), сс. 102‒109. [Roma-nova, T. A., Pavlova, E. B. (2019) ‘Resil-ience in the European Union and Russia: Essence and Perspectives of the New Concept’ [Stressoustojchivost' v Ev-rosojuze i Rossija: sut' i perspektivy novoj koncepcii], Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 63(6), рp. 102‒109. (In Russ.)].

Agnew, J. A. (2003) Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical differ-ence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dodds, K. J. and Sidaway, J. D. (1994) ‘Locating critical geopolitics’, Environment and planning D: society and space, 12(3), рp. 515‒524, DOI: 10.1068/d120515.

Elliott, C. (2017) Democracy promotion as for-eign policy: Temporal othering in interna-tional relations. Abingdon: Routledge.

Said, E. W. (1995) Orientalism: Western concep-tions of the Orient. London: Penguin.

Tuathail, G. Ó. (1996) Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. Lon-don: Routledge, 1996.

Waever, O. (1996) ‘European security identities’, JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 34(1), pр. 103‒132, DOI: 10.1111/ j.1468-5965.1996.tb00562.x.

Zwolski, K. (2020) ‘Diversified in unity: the agenda for the geopolitical European Commission’, Global affairs, рp. 1‒17, DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2020.1834427.

Published

2023-04-28

How to Cite

Kotsur Г. В. (2023). GEOPOLITICAL TURN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE CONCEPTUAL REVOLUTION OR CONTINUATION OF THE TRADITION?. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 17(1), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-1-70-77