POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE EAEU COUNTRIES: PROBLEMS OF ADAPTATION AND TRANSFORMATION

Authors

  • Владимир Пантин / Vladimir Pantin Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-4579

Keywords:

Eurasian Economic Union, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, political institutions, socio-political instability, state, nation

Abstract

The article is based on a comparative analysis of political institutions in Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia – the members of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The author shows that political institutions in these countries have a number of distinctive characteristics and common features. The latter include a lack of developed party system; the presence of strong institutions of the presidency and of the ruling “party of power”, as well as informal political institutions and practices. Based on an analysis of in-depth interviews with the experts from Armenia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, the author concludes that these countries tend to form ethnic rather than civil nations and identities, which results in the underdevelopment of political institutions. However, due to increasing global and domestic socio-political instability, and worldwide technological and socio-cultural shifts, political institutions in the EAEU countries are forced to adapt to new conditions and undergo transformations. The author shows that the processes of adaptation and transformation of political institutions are more intense in Armenia and in Kyrgyzstan. However, this is closely related to increases in domestic instability and change of power in these countries, while in Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, these processes are more gradual and long-lasting. Still, such a duration comes along with the risk of delay in the necessary political changes. The article predicts an increase in socio-political instability and the rate of change of political institutions in the EAEU countries in the 2020s, which is associated with the consequences of global technological, sociocultural, and geopolitical shifts. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-2-88-97

Author Biography

Владимир Пантин / Vladimir Pantin, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Philosophy, Head of the Department for Comparative Political Research

References

Вайнштейн, Г. (2018) ‘Европейский популизм в конце 2010-х’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 3, сс. 29–38. [Vainstein, G. ‘European Populism in the Late 2010s’ [Evropeiskyi populism v kontse 2010-h], World Economy and

International Relations, 3, pр. 29–38. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-3-29-38.

Виноградов, А. В., Рябов, А. В. (2019) ‘Политические системы постсоветских стран и Китая в процессе межсистемной трансформации’, Полис. Политические исследования, 3, сс. 69–86. [Vinogradov, A. V., Ryabov, A. V. (2019) ‘Political Systems of Post-Soviet countries and China [Politicheskie sistemy postsovet-skikh stran i Kitaya], Polis. Political Studies, 3, pр. 69–86. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.03.05.

Господарик, Ю. П., Пашковская, М. В. (2016) Международная экономическая без-опасность. Москва: Университет «Синергия». 416 с. [Gospodarik, Yu. P., Pash¬kovskaya, M. V. (2016) International Economic Security [Mezhdunarodnaya ekono¬micheskaya bezopasnost’]. Mos-cow: University “Synergia” Press. (In Russ.)].

Дробижева, Л. М. (2018) ‘Российская идентичность: дискуссии в политическом пространстве и динамика массового сознания’, Полис. Политические исследования, 5, сс. 100–115. [Drobizheva, L. M. (2018) ‘Russian Identity: Discussions in the Political Space and Dynamics of Mass Consciousness’ [Rossiyskaya iden-tichnost: diskussii v politicheskom pros-transtve i di¬namika massovogo soznani-ya], Polis. Political Studies, 5, pр. 100–115. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.05.09.

Ефимова, Л., Хохлова, Н. (2020) ‘Концептуализация «азиатских ценностей» в Малайзии и Сингапуре’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 1, сс. 91–98. [Efimova, L., Khokhlova, N. (2020) ‘Conceptualization of “Asian Val-ues” in Malaysia and Singapore’ [Kon-tseptualizatsya “aziatskikh tsennostei v Malaizii i Singapure], World Economy and International Relations, 1, pр. 91–98. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-1-91-98.

Кардава, Н. В. (2019) ‘Политика обеспечения кибербезопасности в Европейском союзе: национальный и наднациональный уровни’, Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура, 3, сс. 73–78. [Kardava, N. V. (2019) ‘Cybersecurity Policy in the European Union: National and Supranational Levels’ [Politika obes-pechenya kiberbezopasnosti v Evropeis-kom Soyuze: natsionalnyi i nadnatsion-alnyi urovni], Caspian Region: Politics, Economy, Culture, 3, pр. 73–78. (In Russ.)]. DOI:10.21672/1818-510X-2019-60-3-073-078.

Клаус, В. (2016) ‘Будущее международных институтов развития: могут ли их неудачи быть еще большими?’, Мир перемен, 1, сс. 8–10. [Klaus, V. (2016) ‘The Future of International Development Institu-tions: Can Their Failures Be Even Great-er?’ [Budushchee mezhdunarodnykh in-stitutov razvitiya: mogut li ikh neudachi byt’ eshchyo bolshimi?], World of Changes, 1, рp. 8–10. (In Russ.)].

Лапин, Н. И. (2015) ‘Дистанции между состояниями модернизированности макрорегионов России и их цивилизационные смыслы’, Общественные науки и со-временность, 5, cс. 61–71 [Lapin, N.I. (2015) ‘Distances between modernization States of Russian Macroregions and their Civilizational Meaning’ [Distantsii mezhdu sostoyaniymi modernizirovan-nosti makro¬regionov Rossi i ikh tsivili-zatsionnye smysly], Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 5, рp. 61–71. (In Russ.)].

Науменко, Л. И. (2012) Белорусская идентичность. Содержание. Динамика. Социально-демографическая и региональная специфика. Минск: Белорусская наука. [Naumenko, L. I. (2012) Belarusian Iden-tity. Content. Dynamics. Socio-Demogra-phic and Regional Features [Belorusskaya identichnost. Soderzhanye. Dinamika. So¬tsialno-demographicheskaya i region-alnaya spetsifika]. Minsk: Belarusian sci-ence. (In Russ.)].

Пантин, В. И., Лапкин, В. В. (2014) Историческое прогнозирование в XXI веке: Циклы Кондратьева, эволюционные циклы и перспективы мирового развития. Дубна: Феникс+. [Pantin, V. I., Lapkin, V. V. (2014) Historical Forecasting in the 21st Century: Kondratieff Cycles, Evolu-tionary Cycles and the Prospects for World Development [Istoricheskoe prog-nozirovanye v XXI veke: tsikly Kondra-tieva, evolutsionnye tsikly i perspektivy mirovogo razvitiya]. Dubna: Phoenix-plus. (In Russ.)].

Семененко, И. С., Лапкин, В. В., Бардин, А. Л., Пантин, В. И. (2017) ‘Между государством и нацией: дилеммы политики идентичности на постсоветском пространстве’, Полис. Политические исследования, 5, сс. 54–78. [Semenenko, I. S., Lapkin, V. V., Bardin, A. L., Pantin, V. I. (2017) ‘Between the State and the Nation: Dilemmas of Identity Politics in Post-Soviet Societies’ [Mezhdu gosudarstvom i natsiei: dilem-my politiki identichnosti na postso-vetskom prostranstve], Polis. Political Studies, 5, рp. 54–78. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.05.

Тарханян, М. А. (2019) ‘Конституционный кризис в контексте Бархатной революции в Армении: основные этапы, особенности и выводы’, Вестник Российской правовой академии, 2, сс. 90–101. [Tarhanyan, M. A. (2019) ‘Constitutional Crisis in the Context of the Velvet Revo-lution in Armenia: the Main Stages, Fea-tures and Conclusions’ [Konstitutsionnyi krisis v kontekste Barkhatnoi revolutsii v Armenii: osnovnye etapy, osobennosti i vyvody], Bulletin of Russian Academy of law, 2, рp. 90–101. (In Russ.)].

Шайкемелев, М. С. (2013) Казахская идентичность. Алматы: Институт философии, политологии и регионоведения КН МОН РК. 272 с. [Shaikemelev, M. S. (2013) Kazakh Identity [Kazakhskaya identichnost]. Almaty: Institute of phi-losophy, political science and regional studies KN MON RK. (In Russ.)].

Brubaker, R. (2011) ‘Nationalizing States Revis-ited: Projects and Processes of Nationali-zation in Post-Soviet States’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 11, pр. 1785–1814.

Brubaker, R. (2017) ‘Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 8, рp. 1191–1226.

Ferguson, N. (2014) The Great Degeneration: How Institutions Decay and Economies Die. London: Penguin Books.

Grinin, L. E. (2013) ‘The Tiger and the Dragon. Development Models and Perspectives of India and China’, Journal of Globaliza-tion Studies, 1, рp. 5–31.

Grinin, L., Korotayev, A. (2015) Great Diver-gence and Great Convergence. New York: Springer.

Hale, H. E. (2015) Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regimes Dynamics in Comparative Pro-spective. New York: Cambridge Universi-ty Press.

Independence Generation. Youth Study 2016 – Armenia (2016). Yerevan: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

Isaaks, R., Polese, A. (2016) Nation-Building and Identity in the Post-Soviet Space. New Tools and Approaches. London, New York: Routledge.

Rydgren, J. (2017) ‘Radical Right-Wing Parties in Europe. What’s Populism got to do with It?’ Journal of Language and Poli-tics, 4, pр. 485–496.

Published

2020-07-17

How to Cite

Vladimir Pantin В. П. /. (2020). POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE EAEU COUNTRIES: PROBLEMS OF ADAPTATION AND TRANSFORMATION. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 14(2), 88–97. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/3343