NORMATIVE DIMENSION IN THE ‘RESILIENCE’CONCEPT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: INTERNAL CONTRADICTIONS OF NEOLIBERALISM

Authors

Keywords:

resilience, discourse, neoliberalism, European Union, Fragile States Index, Democracy Index, Freedom House report

Abstract

The ecological concept of resilience was defined by its author C.S. Holling as ‘a measure of the persistence of systems and of their ability to absorb change and disturbance and still maintain the same relationships between populations or state variable’. In other words, it means the ability of a system to adapt after shocks and turbulence. In recent decades, the ‘resilience’ notion has been transferred to a wide range of social disciplines, including political science and theory of international relations. Moreover, the European Union has articulated its own interpretation of this concept, where resilience is closely connected with the so-called Western political norms – liberal democracy and human rights. Comparing Fragile States Index, Democracy Index, Freedom House report, on the one hand, and normative position of Brussels – on the other, the author describes such an odd interpretation of resilience as a deeply controversial one. Comparative analysis reveals the presence of an inverse correlation between resilience and the normative component, rather than a direct one. The contradictory nature of the link between resilience and normativity (even within the neoliberal discourse) makes us critically reflect on the relationship between ‘resilience’ as a discursive concept of the European Union and resilience as a real ability of the system to adapt after shocks.DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2019-2-70-77

Author Biography

Глеб Коцур / Gleb Kotsur, Saint Petersburg State University

Postgraduate Student, Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Faculty of International Relations

References

Романова, Т. А. (2017) ‘Категория “Стрессоустойчивость” в Европейском Союзе', Современная Европа, 4(76), сс. 7‒29. [Romanova, T. A. (2017) ‘Resilience cat-egory in the European Union’ [Kategoriya “Stressoustoichivost'” v Evropeiskom So-yuze], Contemporary Europe, 4(76), pр. 17‒29. (In Russ.)].

Bourbeau, P. (2015) ‘Resilience and international politics: premises, debates, agenda’, Inter-national Studies Review, 17(3), pр. 374‒395.

Brassett, J., Croft, S., and Vaughan-Williams, N. (2013) ‘Introduction: an agenda for resili-ence research in politics and international relations’, Politics, 33(4), pp. 221‒228.

Brassett, J., Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015) ‘Securi-ty and the performative politics of resili-ence: Critical infrastructure protection and humanitarian emergency preparedness’, Security Dialogue, 46(1), pp. 32‒50.

Chandler, D. and Reid, J. (2016) The neoliberal subject: resilience, adaptation and vulner-ability. London: Rowman & Littlefield In-ternational.

Coaffee, J., Fussey, P. (2015) ‘Constructing resil-ience through security and surveillance: the politics, practices and tensions of se-curity-driven resilience’, Security Dia-logue, 46(1), pp. 86‒105.

Coaffee, J. (2013) ‘Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: From na-tional security to local place-making’, Pol-itics, 33(4), pp. 240‒252.

Heydemann, S. and Leenders, R. (2011) ‘Authori-tarian learning and authoritarian resilience: regime responses to the “Arab awaken-ing”’, Globalizations, 8(5), pp. 647‒653.

Holling, C. S. and Gunderson, L. H. (2002) ‘Re-silience and adaptive cycles’ in: Holling, C. S. and Gunderson, L. H. (eds.) Panar-chy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington: Island Press, pp. 25‒63.

Holling, C. S. (1973) ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), pp. 1‒23.

De Milliano, C., Jurriens, J. (2016) ‘A different cup of tea: learning from enfancing resili-ence in risl prone communities’ in: Chan-dler, D., Coaffee, J. (eds.) Routledge handbook of international resilience: poli-cies, theories and practices. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 253‒267.

Olsson, L., Jerneck, A., Thoren, H., Persson, J., and O'Byrne, D. (2016) ‘A social science perspective on resilience’ in: Chandler, D., Coaffee, J. (eds.) Routledge handbook of international resilience: policies, theories and practices. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 49‒63.

Perrings, C. (1998) ‘Introduction: resilience and sustainability’, Environment and Devel-opment Economics, 3(2), pp. 221‒262.

Walker, B. H., Gunderson, L. H., Kinzig, A. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., and Schultz, L. (2006) ‘A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems’, Ecology and Society, 11(1) [online]. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13/ (Accessed: 8 May 2018).

Published

2019-07-11

How to Cite

Gleb Kotsur Г. К. /. (2019). NORMATIVE DIMENSION IN THE ‘RESILIENCE’CONCEPT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: INTERNAL CONTRADICTIONS OF NEOLIBERALISM. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 13(2), 70–77. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/2368

Issue

Section

Статьи