Language of minorities in school education in Russia: the scope and factors of variability

Authors

Keywords:

ethnic minorities, language policy, school education, comparative analysis

Abstract

Teaching minority languages at school is one of the key aspects of language policy. At the same time, the scale of language teaching varies to a great extent in respect of different minorities in different regions. The article aims to identify the main factors that affect these differences. The quantitative comparative analysis, performed based on the results of the 2010 All-Russian Census and on the data of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, shows that the most important factors are the official status of the minority language and some demographic characteristics of the ethnic group, such as the high share of the group in the population of the region, as well as its absolute size. Furthermore, the localization of the group in the physical space of the region and the segregated format of localization are of significant importance. Additionally, the “maturity” of teaching minority languages in the region on the whole has a positive impact. The combination of these factors explains quite well the variability in the minority languages teaching in secondary schools. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2018-3-120-136

Author Biography

Петр Панов / Petr Panov, Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of RAS

Chief Research Fellow

References

Борисова Н.В. Когда языки в огне: оспаривание языковых режимов как вызов балансу в межэтнических отношениях. М., 2017. [Borisova N.V. When languages are on fire: contestation of the language regimes as a challenge to the balance in interethnic relations. Moscow, 2017].

Камалова Р. Этническая гетерогенность: основные понятия и проблемы измерения // Полития. 2013. № 4. С. 127‒149. [Kamalova R. Ethnic Heterogeneity: Main Concepts and Measurement Problems // Politeia. 2013. Issue 4. P. 127‒149].

Минаева Э.Ю. Территориальное измерение сегментации политического пространства на основе картографических проекций в ArcGIS // Цифровая гуманитаристика: ресурсы, методы, исследования. Пермь, 2017. С. 44‒48. [Minaeva E. Territorial dimension of segmentation of political space on the basis of cartographic projections in ArcGIS // International scientific conference “Digital Humanities: Resources, Methods, and Research”. Perm, 2017. P. 44‒48].

Мухарямов Н.М., Мухарямова Л.М. Язык и политика в контекстах публичности // Политическая рефлексия, теория и методология научных исследований. Политическая наука: Ежегодник 2017 / Российская ассоциация политической науки. М., 2017. С. 110‒128. [Mukharyamov N.M., Mukharyamova L.M. Language and Politics in the Context of Publicity // Political Reflection,

Theory and Methodology of Research. Political Science: Yearbook 2017 / Russian Political Science Association. Moscow, 2017. P.110‒128].

Alesina A., Devleeschauwer A., Easterly W., Kurlat S., Wacziarg R. Fractionalization // Journal of Economic Growth. 2003. No. 8. Р. 155‒94.

Borisova N., Sulimov K. Language territorial regimes in multilingual ethnic territorial autonomies // Nationalities Papers. 2018. Vol. 46. Issue 3. Р. 358‒373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2017.1351938

Brubaker R. Language, Religion and the Politics of Difference // Nations and Nationalism. 2013. Vol. 19. Issue 1. Р. 1‒20.

Cardinal L., Sonntag S. State Traditions and Language Regimes: A Historical Institutionalism Approach to Language Policy // European and regional Studies. 2016. Vol. 8. Issue 1. Р. 5‒21.

Chevalier J. School-based linguistic and cultural revitalization as a local practice: Sakha language education in the city of Yakutsk, Russian Federation // Nationalities Papers. 2017. Vol. 44. Issue 4. Р. 613‒631.

Liu A. Democracy and minority language recognition: tyranny of the majority and the conditional effects of group size // Democratization. 2017. Vol. 24. Issue 3. Р. 544‒565.

Marquardt K. Stabilization and symbolism: language and regional politics in the Chuvash Republic // Nationalities Papers. 2012. Vol. 40. Issue 1. Р. 127‒147.

O’Leary B. An Iron Law of Nationalism and Federation? A (Neo-Diceyian) Theory of the Necessity of a Federal Staatsvolk, and of Consociational Rescue // Nations and Nationalism. 2001. Vol. 7. Issue 3. Р. 273–96.

Suleymanova D. Between Regionalisation and Centralisation: The Implications of Russian Education Reforms for Schooling in Tatarstan // Europe-Asia Studies. 2018. Vol. 70. Issue 1. Р. 53‒74.

Weidmann N., Rød J., Cederman L.-E. Representing Ethnic Groups in Space: A New Dataset // Journal of Peace Research. 2010. No. 4. P. 491–499.

Wucherpfennig J., Weidmann N., Girardin L., Cederman L.-E., Wimmer A. Politically Relevant Ethnic Groups across Space and Time: Introducing the GeoEPR Dataset // Conflict Management and Peace Science. 2011. No. 5. P. 423–437.

Published

2018-09-28

How to Cite

Petr Panov П. П. /. (2018). Language of minorities in school education in Russia: the scope and factors of variability. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, (3), 120–136. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/1592

Most read articles by the same author(s)