Euphoria or hangover? Political blame attribution at the times of economic recession. Evidence from a survey experiment
Keywords:
blame attribution, economic crisis, rally around the flag, public opinion, electoral authoritarianism, survey experimentAbstract
How is perception of the state authorities affected when an economic downturn interferes with citizens’ patriotic unity? Which takes the upper hand: euphoria born of geopolitical success or a hangover from economic misfortune? This study explores the variance in political support in Russia after the annexation of Crimea in the context of the economic crisis. Using a population-based survey experiment, we randomly assigned questions asking to assess the Crimea joining Russia, the state of economy in Russia, and both of them. Comparing the averages between the group with the question on Crimea and the group with both questions, we estimated the average treatment effect of the economic downturn undermining national consolidation in regard to the evaluation of the president, the parliament (State Duma) and government effectiveness. Counterintuitively, the president’s rating only wins when patriotic unity is disturbed by the economic hardship, but this disturbance has no effect on theevaluation of the parliament and the government effectiveness. We found that the euphoria somewhat suppresses the hangover and preserves the ratings of the State Duma and the government, which receive significantly lower effectiveness evaluations in situations where there is only a hangover (without emphasized patriotism). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2018-3-67-87References
Bargh J. A, Chen M., Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1996. No. 71(2). Р. 230‒244.
Bartels L., Bermeo N. Mass politics in tough times: opinions, votes and protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Chaisty P., Whitefield S. The effects of the global financial crisis on Russian political attitudes. // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2012. No. 28(2). Р. 187‒208.
Chatagnier J. T. The effect of trust in government on rallies ‘round the flag. // Journal of Peace Research. 2012. No. 49(5). Р. 631‒645.
Diaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B., Weingast B.R. Tragic brilliance: Equilibrium party hegemony in Mexico. 2003. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1153510 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1153510.
Frye T. Economic Sanctions and Public Opinion: Survey Experiments from Russia. 2017. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3048980 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048980.
Frye T., Gehlbach S., Marquardt K.L., John Reuter O. Is Putin’s popularity real? // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2017. No. 33(1). Р. 1‒15.
Galtung J. On the effects of international economic sanctions, with examples from the case of Rhodesia. // World politics. 1967. No. 19 (3). Р. 378‒416.
Gasiorowski M. J. Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis. // American Political Science Review. 1995. No. 89(4). Р. 882‒897.
Gélineau F. Electoral accountability in the developing world. // Electoral Studies. 2013. No. 32(3). Р. 418‒424.
Voter Volatility in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes: Testing the “Tragic Brilliance” Thesis. // Comparative Sociology. 2016. No. 15(5). Р. 535‒559.
Gourevitch P.A. Politics in hard times: comparative responses to international economic crises. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.
Haggard S. The politics of the Asian financial crisis. // Journal of Democracy. 2000. No. 11(2). Р. 130‒144.
Hetherington M.J, Nelson M. Anatomy of a rally effect: George W. Bush and the war on terrorism. // PS: Political Science & Politics. 2003. No. 36(1). Р. 37‒42.
Iyengar S., Simon А. News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. // Communication research. 1993. No. 20(3). Р. 365‒383.
Kapteyn A., Smith J.P., Van Soest A. Vignettes and self-reports of work disability in the United States and the Netherlands. // American Economic Review. 2007. No. 97(1). Р. 461‒473.
Magaloni B. Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
McAllister I, White S. ‘It's the Economy, Comrade!’ Parties and Voters in the 2007 Russian Duma Election. // Europe-Asia Studies. 2008. No. 60(6). Р. 931‒957.
Democratization in Russia and the global financial crisis. // Journal of communist studies and transition politics. 2011. No. 27(3‒4). Р. 476‒495.
Mueller J.E. Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson. // American Political Science Review. 1970. No. 64(1). Р. 18‒34.
Mutz D.C. Population-based survey experiments. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2011.
Pape R.A. Why economic sanctions do not work. // International security. 1997. No. 22(2). Р. 90‒136.
Pei M., Adesnik A.D. Why recessions don't start revolutions. // Foreign Policy. 2000. P. 138‒151.
Pepinsky T.B. Economic crises and the breakdown of authoritarian regimes: Indonesia and Malaysia in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
The Global Economic Crisis and the Politics of Non-Transitions. // Government and Opposition. 2012. No. 47(2). Р. 135‒161.
Remmer K.L. The political impact of economic crisis in Latin America in the 1980s. // American Political Science Review. 1991. No. 85(3). Р. 777‒800.
Robinson N. Russia's response to crisis: The paradox of success. // Europe-Asia Studies. 2013. No. 65(3). Р. 450‒472.
Rose R. Micro-economic responses to a macro-economic crisis: a pan-European perspective. // Journal of communist studies and transition politics. 2011. No. 27(3-4). Р. 364‒384.
Rubin D.B. Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. // Journal of educational Statistics 1977. No. 2(1). Р. 1‒26.
Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2005. No. 100(469). Р. 322‒331.
Treisman D. Putin's popularity since 2010: why did support for the Kremlin plunge, then stabilize? // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2014. No. 30(5). Р. 370‒388.
Wheeler S.C., Jarvis W.B.G., Petty R.E. Think unto others: The self-destructive impact of negative racial stereotypes. // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2001. No. 37(2). Р. 173‒180.
Zaller J., Feldman S. A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. // American Journal of Political Science.1992. No. 36(3). Р. 579‒616.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.
