Challenges for building the EU common cybersecurity policy

Authors

  • Владимир Пантин / Vladimir Pantin Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-4579
  • Николай Кардава / Nikolay Kardava Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS

Keywords:

European Union, Germany, regulation of the cyberspace, common policy, cybersecurity, cyber threats, supranational political space.

Abstract

The article analyzes the most complex and topical problems of ensuring cybersecurity in the EU countries and of forming a common policy in this field. The authors consider the general political and economic factors that make the cybersecurity problems challenging at the national, supranational and global levels. The German case shows that in several developed EU member countries, national cybersecurity policy proves to be more efficient than a supranational one. The authors conclude that the German approach to ensuring cybersecurity is characterized by its complex and fundamental nature. It comprises a whole system of normative acts, plans and institutions. The article outlines the key approaches, trends and contradictions related to developing a common EU cybersecurity strategy. The authors analyze the main documents and actionsof the European Commission and other EU bodies in this field, including theCybersecurity Strategy of the European Union (2013), the EU Directive on the Security of Networks and Information Systems (2016), and the General Data Protection Regulation (2018). At the same time, the authors show that the EU governing bodies’ activity in the field of cybersecurity is faced with the inability of several member countries to comply with all the directives, orders, regulations and other normative acts. The authors define the major impediments to the implementation of the common EU cybersecurity policy: different levels of economic, technological and social development of its member countries; the mismatch between the interests of different political actors; different approaches of individual EU states to regulating cyberspace; the complexity of cybersecurity policy coordination between the EU member countries. The authors conclude that the obstacles primarily flow from the underdevelopment of the EU common political space. At the same time, cybersecurity problems are likely to contribute to a more accelerated and effective formation of such a space at the supranational level. Furthermore, the authors consider that some of the stepstaken by the EU to ensure cybersecurity, properly adapted and adjusted, could be useful for the Russian Federation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2018-3-5-18

Author Biographies

Владимир Пантин / Vladimir Pantin, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS

Head of the Department for Comparative Political Studies

Николай Кардава / Nikolay Kardava, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS

Junior Research Fellow

References

Глобальный индекс кибербезопасности и профили по киберблагополучию: отчет. Женева, ABI Research, 2015. 516 с. Global'nyj indeks kiberbezopasnosti i profili po kiberblagopoluchiyu. Otchet. [Global Cybersecurity Index and Cyberwellness Profiles. Report]. Geneva, ABI Research, 2015. 516 p.].

Господарик Ю.П., Пашковская М.В. Международная экономическая безопасность. М., 2016. 416 с. [Gospodarik Ju.P., Pashkovskaya M.V. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost'. [International Economic Security]. Moscow, Synergy University Publ., 2016. 416 p.].

Елин В.М. Сравнительный анализ правового обеспечения информационной безопасности в России и за рубежом: монография. М., 2016. 168 с. [Elin V.M. Sravnitel'nyj analiz pravovogo obespecheniya informacionnoj bezopasnosti v Rossii i za rubezhom. Monografiya. [Comparative Analysis of the Legal Support

for Information Security in Russia and in Foreign Countries. Monograph]. Moscow, 2016. 168 p.]

ЕС перед вызовами миграционного кризиса. Позиции европейских стран: аналитический доклад / под ред. Н.К. Арбатовой, А.М. Кокеева. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2016. 52 с. [ES pered vyzovami migracionnogo krizisa. Pozicii evropejskikh stran. [The EU faced with the migration crisis. Positions of European countries. Analytical Report. Ed. by N.K. Arbatova, A.M. Kokeev]. Moscow,

IMEMO Publ., 2016. 52 p.].

Нижегородцев Д. Европейский центр борьбы с Киберпреступностью подвел итоги первого года работы // Деловая газета «Взгляд». 2014. 11 февр. [Nizhegorodcev D. Evropejskij centr bor'by s kiberprestupnost'yu podvel itogi pervogo

goda raboty // Delovaya gazeta «Vzglyad». 11.02.2014. [European cybercrime centre sums up its first year work // Online newspaper “Vzglyad”. 11.02.2014]. Available at: https://vz.ru/news/2014/2/11/671970.html (accessed 14.06.2018).

Потемкина О.Ю. Вышнеградская группа и «гибкая солидарность» // Современная Европа. 2016. № 6. С. 43–52. [Potemkina O.Yu. Vishegradskaya gruppa i «gibkaya solidarnost'» // Sovremennaya Evropa. [Visegrad group and “flexible solidarity” // Contemporary Europe. 2016. No. 6. P. 43–52].

Сейник В. Борьба с киберпреступностью – одна из составляющих международной безопасности / Центр исследования компьютерной преступности. 19.04.2008. [Sejnik V. Bor'ba s kiberprestupnost'yu – odna iz sostavlyayushchikh mezhdunarodnoj bezopasnosti / Centr issledovaniya komp'yuternoj prestupnosti. [Struggle Against Cybercrime as Part of International Security / Computer Crime Research Center. 19.04.2018]. Available at: http://www.crimeresearch. ru/articles/Seynik/ (accessed 14.06.2018).

Соловьев А.И., Куприяновский В.П., Соловьев С.А. Единый цифровой рынок Европейского Союза: текущее состояние и направления развития // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2017. Vol. 5. No. 10. P. 47–54. [Solov'ev A.I., Kupriyanovskij V.P., Solov'ev S.A. Edinyj cifrovoj rynok Evropejskogo

Soyuza: tekushchee sostoyanie i napravleniya razvitiya. [Single Digital Market in the European Union: Current State and Development Trends // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2017. Vol. 5. No. 10. P. 47–54].

Haeni R. 2016. Cybersecurity: New EU Directive Published. 20.07.2016. Available at: https://news.pwc.ch/28616/cybersecurity-new-eu-directive-published/ (accessed 14.06.2018).

Schreier F., Weekes B., Winkler T.H. Cybersecurity: The Road Ahead. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). DCAF Horizon 2015 Working Paper No. 4. Available at:

https://dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/Cyber2.pdf (accessed 14.06.2018).

Published

2018-09-28

How to Cite

Vladimir Pantin В. П. /, & Nikolay Kardava Н. К. /. (2018). Challenges for building the EU common cybersecurity policy. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, (3), 5–18. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/1585