PUBLIC DISCUSSION AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAWMAKING IN RUSSIA: MECHANISMS OF SYMBOLIC RESPONSE (2000–2023)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2026-1-16-24

Keywords:

symbolic legislation, issue-related legislation, environmental legislation, parlamentarism, environmental policy

Abstract

This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the factors influencing legislative activity in the field of environmental policy in Russia from 2000 to 2023. The dataset includes the number of news articles on ecological events, legislative initiatives, and the actions of various legislative actors (members of parliament, government, and the president). Regression analysis was employed to identify the key relationships between the volume of environmental news coverage and the total number of submitted and considered environmental bills. The findings demonstrate that informational intensity is the primary driver of legislative initiatives: an increase in environmental news coverage is statistically significantly associated with a rise in the number of environmental bills. Additionally, a robust temporal trend was observed, reflecting a steady growth in legislative activity over the study period amid the development of both the media landscape and the lawmaking process. These results highlight the importance of public attention and media support in shaping the environmental agenda within legislative processes, and provide a foundation for further research into the mechanisms through which mass media influ-ences legislative dynamics in ecological policy

Author Biography

Vyacheslav Loginov, Perm State University, Perm, Russia.

PhD student, Junior Research Fellow, Department of Political Sciences,

References

Михеев, А. К. (2025) ‘«Законодательные коалиции при доминировании одной партии: стратегии взаимодействия «Единой России» с парламентской оппозицией в сфере экологии (IV-VII созывы)»’, Вестник Пермского уни-верситета. Политология, 19(4), сс. 96–106. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2025-4-96-106 [Mikheev, A. K. (2025) ‘Legislative coalitions under the dominance of one party: strategies of inter-action between United Russia and the parliamentary opposition in the sphere of ecology (IV-VII convocations)’ [Za-konodatel'nye koalicii pri dominirovanii odnoj partii: strategii vzaimodejstviya «Edinoj Rossii» s parlamentskoj op-poziciej v sfere ekologii (IV-VII so-zyvy)], Bulletin of Perm University. Poli¬tical Science, 19(4), pp. 96–106. (In Russ.)].

Трубина, Е. Г. (2020) ‘«Медийный контроль и гражданские протесты в России»’, Социологическое обозрение, 19(1), cс. 7–32. [Trubina, E. G. (2020) ‘Media control and civil protests in Russia’ [Medijnyj kontrol' i grazhdanskie protesty v Rossii] Russian Sociological Review, 19(1), pp. 7–32. (In Russ.)].

Турцева, К. П. (2025) ‘«Символическое vs. проблемно-ориентированное законодательство в экологической сфере: институциональные последствия конфликта восприятия (на примере инициатив субъектов РФ)»’, Вестник Пермского университета. Полито-логия, 19(4), сс. 51–66. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2025-4-51-66 [Turtseva Ch. (2025) ‘Symbolic vs. is-sue-related legislation in environmental sphere: institutional consequences of the perception conflict (on the example of Russian regions)’ [Simvolicheskoe vs. problemno-orientirovannoe za-konodatel'stvo v ekologicheskoj sfere: institucional'nye posledstviya konflikta vospriyatiya (na primere iniciativ sub"ektov RF)], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 19(4), pp. 51–66. (In Russ.)].

Boydstun, A. E. (2013) Making the news: politics, the media, and agenda setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 280 p.

Edelman, M. (1964) The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 201 p.

Edelman, M. (1985) Political language: words that succeed and policies that fail. Or-lando: Academic Press.174 p.

Golosov, G. (2013) ‘The Russian party system and the problem of representation’, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 4(1), pp. 1–13.

Kingdon, J. W. (1995) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd edn. New York: HarperCollins. 240 p.

Lukin, A. (2021) ‘The Russian state and environmental governance: from control to co-optation?’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(3), pp. 209–228.

McCombs, M., Shaw, D. L. (1972) ‘The agenda-setting function of mass media’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), pp. 176–187.

Pralle, S. B. (2009) ‘Agenda-setting and climate change’, Environmental Politics, 18(5), pp. 781–799.

Remington, T. F. (2008) ‘Patronage and the party of power: president–parliament relations under Vladimir Putin’, Eu-rope-Asia Studies, 60(6), pp. 959–987.

Schedler, A. (2002) ‘The menu of manipulation’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2), pp. 36–50.

Yakovlev, A. (2019) ‘Environmental protest in Russia: local specifics and broader implications’, Russian Analytical Digest, (237), pp. 2–5

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Loginov В. А. (2026). PUBLIC DISCUSSION AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAWMAKING IN RUSSIA: MECHANISMS OF SYMBOLIC RESPONSE (2000–2023). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 20(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2026-1-16-24

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies