PSAMMORHEOPHILIC BENTHIC COMMUNITIES STRUCTURE OF LOWLAND PART OF YAIVA RIVER

Main Article Content

Иван/Ivan Викторович/V. Поздеев/Pozdeev

Abstract

The species list of benthic macroinvertebrates inhabiting the sandy sediments is given. The main features of psammorheophilic benthic communities are the presence of a specific forms, among which the most important are larvae of Diptera, as well as low levels of abundance and biomass. Analysis of benthic communities using indexes based on Shannon's entropy showed more structure and benthic communities of sandy sediments biomass than in abundance. A distinctive feature of psammorheophilic communities also is a low individual's weight, as evidenced by indexes based on the Rao's entropy. Best score assessment of degree of water pollution and soils obtained using the Balushkina's Integrated mean (IP').

Article Details

How to Cite
Поздеев/Pozdeev И. В. (2018). PSAMMORHEOPHILIC BENTHIC COMMUNITIES STRUCTURE OF LOWLAND PART OF YAIVA RIVER. Bulletin of Perm University. Biology, (3), 355–366. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/bio/article/view/1877
Section
Ecology
Author Biography

Иван/Ivan Викторович/V. Поздеев/Pozdeev, Perm Branch FSBSI «GosNIORH»; Perm State University

Candidate of biology, vice-director for Science;Associate professor of Department of invertebrate zoology and aquatic ecology

References

Алимов А. Ф. Элементы теории функционирования водных экосистем. СПб.: Наука, 2001. 147 с.

Балушкина Е.В. Хирономиды как индикаторы степени загрязнения вод // Методы биологического анализа пресных вод. Л., 1976. С. 106-118.

Балушкина Е.В. Применение интегрального показателя для оценки качества вод по структурным характеристикам донных сообществ // Труды Зоологического института РАН. 1997. Т. 272. С. 266-291.

Балушкина Е.В., Голубков С.М. Биоразнообразие сообществ донных животных и качество вод эстуария р. Невы в условиях антропогенного стресса // Труды Зоологического института РАН. 2015. Т. 319, № 2. С. 229-243.

Бенинг А.Л. О каспийских ракообразных в бассейне реки Волги // Русский гидробиологический журнал. 1924. Т. 3, № 3-5. С. 51-54.

Громов В.В. Современные изменения в распространении каспийских форм в реке Каме // Зоологический журнал. 1956. Т. 35, Вып. 11. С. 1608-1616.

Денисенко С.Г. Информационная мера Шеннона и её применение в оценках биоразнообразия (на примере морского зообентоса) // Исследования фауны морей. СПб., 2006. Т. 56 (64). С. 35-46.

Денисенко С.Г. и др. Результаты оценки экологического благополучия сообществ зообентоса по индексу «разности выравненностей» (DE) II Биология внутренних вод. 2013. № 1. С. 46-55.

Одум Ю. Основы экологии. М.: Мир, 1975. 740 с.

Паньков Н.Н. К изучению зообентоса реки Яйвы в связи с особенностями геологического строения дренируемой территории // Вестник Пермского университета. 2001. Вып. 4. Биология. С. 168— 185.

Прокин А.А., Цветков А.И. Макрозообентос узлов слияния рек // Поволжский экологический журнал. 2013. №2. С. 200-216.

Руководство по методам гидробиологического анализа поверхностных вод и донных отложений / под ред. В.А. Абакумова. Л.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1983. 239 с.

Таусон А. О. Водные ресурсы Молотовской области. Молотов, 1947. 324с.

Шитиков В.К., Розенберг Г.С. Рандомизация и бутстреп: статистический анализ в биологии и экологии с использованием R. Тольятти: Кассандра, 2013. 314 с.

Щербина Г.Х. Годовая динамика макрозообентоса открытого мелководья Волжского плеса Рыбинского водохранилища // Зооценозы водоемов бассейна Верхней Волги в условиях антропогенного воздействия. СПб., 1993. С. 108-144.

Яковлев В.А. Оценка качества поверхностных вод Кольского Севера по биологическим показателям и данным биотестирования (практические рекомендации). Апатиты: Изд-во Кольского филиала АН СССР, 1988. 25 с.

Aluizio R. Forams: Foraminifera and Community Ecology Analyses. 2012. R package version 2.0-3.

Bady P. et al. Use of invertebrate traits for the bio-monitoring of European large rivers: The effects of sampling effort on genus richness and functional diversity // Freshwater Biology. 2005. Vol. 50. P. 159-173.

Clarke K.R. Comparisons of dominance curves // Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1990. Vol. 138. P. 143-157.

Clarke K.R, WarwickR.M. The taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties // Journal Applied Ecology. 1998. Vol. 35. P. 523-531.

Goodnight C.J., Whitley L.S. Oligochaetes as indicators of pollution // Proceedings 15-th Ind. Waste Conference. 1961. Vol. 106. P. 139-142.

Gray N.F. Water technology: an introduction for environmental scientists and engineers. London; New-York: Elsevier, 2010. 768 p.

Hawkes H.A. Origin and development of the Biological Monitoring Working Party score system // Water Research. 1998. Vol. 32. P. 964-968.

Laliberte E., Legendre P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits // Ecology. 2010. Vol. 91. P. 299-305.

Laliberte E., Legendre P., Shipley В. FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. 2014. R package version 1.0-12.

Lavorel S. et al. Assessing functional diversity in the field - methodology matters! // Functional Ecology. 2008. Vol. 22. P. 134-147.

Oksanen J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. 2016. R package version 2.4-0.

Warwick R.M. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthos communities // Marine Biology. 1986. Vol. 92. P. 557-562.

Warwick R.M., Clarke K.R. New 'biodiversity' measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress // Marine ecology progress series. 1995. Vol. 129. P. 301-305.

Woodiwiss F.S. The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent Board // Chemistry and Industry. 1964. Vol. 11. P. 443-447.

Wright J.F., Furse M. T., Armitage P.D. RIVPACS -a technique for evaluating the biological quality of rivers in the UK // European Water Pollution Control. 1993. Vol. 3 (4). P. 15-25.

References

Abakumov V.A., ed. Rukovodstvo po metodam gidrobi-ologiceskogo analiza poverchnostnych vod i donnych otlozenij [Manual on methods of hydrobiological analysis of surface waters and bottom sediments] Leningrad, GydrometeoizdatPubl., 1983. 239 p.

AlimovA.F. Ehlementy teorii funkcionirovanija vod-nych ekosistem [Elements of the theory of the lunc-tioning of aquatic ecosystems]. St-Peterburg, Nauka Publ.,2001. 147 p. (In Russ.).

Aluizio R. Forams: Foraminifera and Community Ecology Analyses. 2012. R package version 2.0-3.

Bady P., Doledec S., FeslC., GayraudS., BacchiM., F. Scholl. Use of invertebrate traits for the biomoni-toring of European large rivers: The effects of sampling effort on genus richness and lunctional diversity. Freshwater Biology, V. 50 (2005): pp. 159-173.

Balushkina E.V. [Application of an integrated indicator for assessing water quality according to the structural characteristics of benthic communities]. Trudy Zo-ologiceskogo instituta RAN, V. 272 (1997): pp. 266-291. (In Russ.).

Balushkina E.V., Golubkov S.M. [Biodiversity of benthic animal communities and quality of waters in the Neva Estuary under anthropogenic stress]. Trudy Zo-ologiceskogo instituta RAN, V. 319(2) (2015): pp. 229-243. (In Russ.).

Bening A.L. [About the Caspian Crustacea in the basin of the Volga River], Russkij gidrobiologiceskij zur-nal, V. 3, N 3-5 (1924): pp. 51-54. (In Russ.).

Clarke K.R. Comparisons of dominance curves. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, V. 138 (1990): pp. 143-157.

Clarke K.R., Warwick RM. The taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. Journal Applied Ecology, V. 35 (1998): pp. 523-531.

Denisenko S.G. [Shannon information measuring and its application to estimation of a biodiversity (on example of marine zoobenthos]. Issledovaniya fauny morej [Explorations of fauna of seas]. St-Peterburg, 2006, V. 56(64), pp. 35-46. (In Russ.).

Denisenko S.G., Barbashova M.A., Belyakov V.P., Skvortsov V.V., Kurashov E.A. [The results of an assessment of the ecological state of zoobenthos communities according to the difference of evenness index (DE')]. Biologija vnutrennich vod, V. 1 (2013): pp. 46-55. (In Russ.).

Goodnight C.J., Whitley L.S. Oligochaetes as indicators of pollution. Proceedings 15-th Ind. Waste Conference, 1961, V. 106, pp. 139-142.

GrayN.F. Water technology: an introduction for environmental scientists and engineers. London, New-York, Elsevier Publ., 2010. 768 p.

Gromov V.V. [Modern changes in the distribution of the Caspian forms in the Kama river], Zoologiceskij zur-nal, V. 35, Iss. 11 (1956): pp. 1608-1616. (In Russ.).

Hawkes H.A. Origin and development of the Biological Monitoring Working Party score system. Water Research, V. 32 (1998): pp. 964-968.

JakovlevV.A. Ocenka kacestva poverchnostnych vod Kol'skogo Severa po biologiceskim pokazateljam i dannym biotestirovanija (prakticeskie rekomendacii). [The assessment of freshwaters quality of Kola North for hydrobiological parameters and the data of toxicity tests], Apatity: Kola Branch AS USSR Publ., 1988. 25 p. (In Russ.).

LaliberteE., LegendreP. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits // Ecology, V. 91 (2010): pp. 299-305.

LaliberteE., LegendreP., ShipleyB. FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. 2014. R package version 1.0-12.

Lavorel S., GrigulisK., Mclntyre S., Williams N.S.G., Garden D., Dorrough J., Berman S., QuetierF., The-bault A., Bonis A. Assessing functional diversity in the field - methodology matters! Functional Ecology, V. 22 (2008): pp. 134-147.

Odum U. Osnovy ekologii [Fundamentals of ecology] Moscow, Mir Publ., 1975. 740 p. (In Russ.).

OksanenJ., BlanchetF.G., Friendly M., Kindt R, LegendreP., McGlinnD., MinchinP.R, O'Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., SolymosP., Stevens M.H.H., Szoecs E., Wagner H. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. 2016. R package version 2.4-0.

Pan'kov N.N. [The spatial distribution of the benthic invertebrates in the Yaiva River as the result of the drainage territory geological structure]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, Iss. 4. Biology (2001): pp. 168-185. (In Russ.).

Prokin A.A., Tsvetkov A.I. [Macrozoobenthos of the confluence areas of rivers]. Povolzskij ёkologiceskij zurnal. N2 (2013): pp. 200-216. (In Russ.).

Tauson A.O. Vodnye resursy Molotovskoj oblasti [Water resources of the Molotov Region], Molotov, 1947. 324p. (In Russ.).

Shcherbina G.H. [Annual dynamics of macrozoobenthos of the open shallows of the Volga Reach of the Rybinsk Reservoir], Zoocenozy vodoemov bassejna Verchnej Volgi v uslovijach antropogen-nogo vozdejstvija [Zoocenoses of reservoirs of the Upper Volga basin under anthropogenic impact], St-Petersburg, Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 1993, pp. 108-144. (In Russ.).

Shitikov V.K., Rozenberg G.S. Randomizacija i but-strep: statisticeskij analiz dannych po biologii i ekologii s ispol'zovaniem R [Randomization and bootstrap: statistical analysis in biology and ecology using R], Tolyatti, Kassandra Publ., 2013. 314 p. (In Russ.).

Warwick RM. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthos communities. Marine Biology, V. 92 (1986): pp. 557-562.

Warwick R.M., Clarke K.R New 'biodiversity' measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Marine ecology progress series, V. 129 (1995): pp. 301-305.

Woodiwiss F.S. The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent Board. Chemistry and Industry, V. 11 (1964): pp. 443-147.

Wright J.F., Furse M.T., ArmitageP.D. RIVPACS - a technique for evaluating the biological quality of rivers in the UK. European Water Pollution Control, V. 3 (4) (1993): pp. 15-25.

Most read articles by the same author(s)