THE DIMORPHISM OF FLOWERS OF JASMINUM FRUTICANS L. (OLEACEAE)

Article Sidebar

PDF (Русский)
Published: Oct 31, 2018
Keywords:
dimorphism polymorphism flower pollen grains jasminum oleaceae heterostyly

Main Article Content

Татьяна/Tatyana Николаевна/Nikolaevna Кузьмина/Kuzmina
FSFIS «Nikitsky Botanical Gardens - National Scientific Center RAS»

Abstract

A comparative analysis of long-styled and short-styled flowers of the distylous species of the Crimean flora Jasminum fruticans L. {Oleaceae) is given. The differences of the corolla length, anthers and stigma heights, stigma-anther separation and pollen grains were found for two plants morphological forms. The stamens, anthers and pollen grains are larger in short-styled flowers. The cytomorphological analysis of pollen grains of J. fruticans flower two morph did not reveal the significant differences between the proportions of morphologically normal pollen grains (about 80%). The state of male gametophyte J. fruticans shows absence of lethal anomalies of its development. A cytomorphological status of pollen does not depend on the morphs of the flower. The functionality of male generative sphere of long-styled and short-styled flowers is equal.

Article Details

How to Cite
Кузьмина/Kuzmina Т. Н. (2018). THE DIMORPHISM OF FLOWERS OF JASMINUM FRUTICANS L. (OLEACEAE). Bulletin of Perm University. Biology, (3), 233–239. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/bio/article/view/1859
Issue
No. 3 (2017): Вестник Пермского университета. Серия «Биология»=Bulletin of Perm University. Biology
Section
Ботаника

License agreement

 

Author Biography

Татьяна/Tatyana Николаевна/Nikolaevna Кузьмина/Kuzmina, FSFIS «Nikitsky Botanical Gardens - National Scientific Center RAS»

Candidate of biology Sciences, Senior Research Fellow, Laboratory of Plants Reproductive Biology and Physiology

References

Агаджанян А.М. Распространённость и распределение гетеростилии в системе покрытосеменных растений // Успехи современной биологии. 2000. Т. 120, № 4. С. 348-360.

Голубев В.Н. Биологическая флора Крыма. Ялта: НБС-ННЦ, 1996. 126 с.

Демьянова Е.И. О полиморфизме некоторых гете-ростильных растений лесостепного Зауралья // Вестник Пермского университета. Серия Биология. 2014. Вып. 2. С. 10-17.

Жинкина Н.А. Гетеростилия // Эмбриология цветковых растений. Терминология и концепции. СПб., 2000. Т. 3. С. 82-83.

Кордюм Е.Л., Глущенко Г.И. Цитоэмбриологиче-ские аспекты проблемы пола покрытосеменных. Киев: Наукова думка, 1976. 200 с.

Методические рекомендации по изучению антэко-логических особенностей цветковых растений. Морфологическое описание репродуктивной структуры. Ялта, 1986. 43 с.

Плохинский Н.А. Биометрия. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1970. 367 с.

Фегри К., Ван дер Пейл Л. Основы экологии опыления. М.: Мир, 1982. 379 с.

Шевченко С.В., Ругузов И.А., Ефремова Л.М. Методика окраски постоянных препаратов метиловым зеленым и пиронином // Бюллетень Государственного Никитского ботанического сада. 1986. Вып. 60. С. 99-101.

Baker H. G. Reproductive methods as factors in speci-ation in flowering plants // Cold Spring Harbor symp. Quant. Boil. 1960. Vol. 24. P. 177-191.

Faivre A.E., McDade L.A. Population-level variation in the expression of heterostyly in three species of Rubiaceae: does reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas characterize heterostyly? // American Journal of Botany. 2001. Vol. 88, № 5. P. 841-853.

Ganders F.R. The biology of heterostyly // New Zealand Journal of Botany. 1979. Vol. 17. P. 607635.

Guitian J., Guitian P., Medrano M. Floral biology of the distylous Mediteranean shrub Jasminum fruti-cans (Oleaceae) // Nordic Journal of Botany. 1998. Vol. 18. P. 195-201.

Naiki A,. Nagamasu H. Distyly and pollen dimorphism in Damnacanthus (Rubiaceae) // Journal of Plant Research. 2003. Vol. 116. P. 105-113. doi 10.1007/s10265-002-0075-1.

Olesen J.M. et al. Heterostyly in the Canarian endemic Jasminum odoratissimum (Oleaceae) // Nordic Journal of Botany. 2003. Vol. 23, № 5. P. 537-539.

Pailler Th., Thompson J.D. Distyly and variation in heteromorphic incompatibility in Gaertnera vagi-nata (Rubiaceae) endemic to La Reunion Island // American Journal of Botany. 1997. Vol. 84, № 3. P. 315-327.

Philipp M., Schou O. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. Distyly, self-incompatibility, pollen load and fecundity in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae) // New Phytol. 1981. Vol. 89. P. 693-703.

Thompson J.D., Dommee B. Sequential variation in the components of reproductive success in the distylous Jasminum fruticans (Oleaceae) // Oecologia. 1993. Vol. 94, № 4. P. 480-487. doi: 10.1007/BF00566962

Tompson J.D., Dommee B. Morph-specific patterns of variation in stigma height in natural populations of distylous Jasminum fruticans // New Phytol. 2000. Vol. 148. P. 303-314.

References

Agadjanyan A.M. [The extent and distribution of heterostyly in system of Amgiosperms]. Uspechi sovremennoj biologii. V. 120, N 4 (2000): pp. 348-360. (In Russ.).

Baker H.G. Reproductive methods as factors in speci-ation in flowering plants. Cold Spring Harbor symp. Quant. Boil. V. 24. (1960): pp. 177-191.

Demyanova E.I. [To the polymorphism of some het-erostyled plants of the forest-steppe of the TransUrals]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Seria Biologia. Iss. 2 (2014): pp. 10-17. (In Russ.).

Faivre A.E., McDade L.A. Population-level variation in the expression of heterostyly in three species of Rubiaceae: does reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas characterize heterostyly? American Journal of Botany. V. 88, N 5 (2001): pp. 841853.

Fegri K., Pèjl L. van der Osnovy èkologii opyleniaja [The principles of Pollination Ecology.] Moskow, Mir Publ., 1982. 377 p. (In Russ.).

Ganders F.R. The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany. V. 17 (1979): pp. 607635.

Golubev W.N. Biologiceskaya flora Kryma [Biological flora of the Crimea]. Yalta, 1996. 126 p. (In Russ.).

Guitian J., Guitian P., Medrano M. Floral biology of the distylous Mediteranean shrub Jasminum fruti-cans (Oleaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany. V. 18 (1998): pp. 195-201.

Kordyum E.L., Gluschenko G.I. Citoëmbriologiceskie aspektyi problemy pola pokrytosemennych [Cyto-embryological aspects of the problem of gender angiosperms]. Kiev: Naukova dumka Publ., 1976. 200 p. (In Russ.).

Metodiceskie rekomendacii po izuceniju antëko-logiceskich osobennostej cvetkovych rastenij. Morfologiceskoe opisanie reproduktivnoj struk-tury [Methodical Recommendations for Study An-thecological Features of Flowering Plants. Morphological Description of the Reproductive Structures]. Yalta, 1986. 43 p. (In Russ.).

Naiki A., Nagamasu H. Distyly and pollen dimorphism in Damnacanthus (Rubiaceae). Journal of Plant Research. V. 116 (2003): pp. 105-113.

Olesen J.M., Dupont Y.L., Ehlers B.K., Valido A., Hansen D.M. Heterostyly in the Canarian endemic Jasminum odoratissimum (Oleaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany V. 23, N 5 (2003): pp. 537-539.

Pailler Th., Thompson J.D. Distyly and variation in heteromorphic incompatibility in Gaertnera vagi-nata (Rubiaceae) endemic to La Reunion Island. American Journal of Botany. V. 84, N. 3 (1997): pp. 315-327.

Philipp M., Schou O. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. Distyly, self-incompatibility, pollen load and fecundity in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae). New Phytol. V. 89 (1981): pp. 693-703.

Plohinskij N.A. Biometrija [Biometry]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1970. 367 p. (In Russ.).

Shevchenko S.V., Ruguzov I.A., Efremova L.M. [Staining Methods if Permanent Preparation with Metyl Green Pyronin]. Byulleten' Gosudarstven-nogo Nikitskogo botaniceskogo sada. Iss. 60 (1986): pp. 99-101. (In Russ.).

Thompson J.D., Dommée B. Sequential variation in the components of reproductive success in the dis-tylous Jasminum fruticans (Oleaceae). Oecologia V. 94, N 4 (1993): pp. 480-487.

Tompson J.D., Dommée B. Morph-specific patterns of variation in stigma height in natural populations of distylous. Jasminum fruticans. New Phytol. V. 148 (2000): pp. 303-314.

Zinkina N.A. [Heterostyly]. Embrylogija cvetkovych rastenij. Terminologija i koncepcii [Batygina T.B. ed. Embrylogy of Angiosperms. Terminology and concepts]. St. Petersburg, 2000, V. 3. pp. 82-83. (In Russ.).