INSTRUMENTALIZATION OF THE SUBJECT OF THE FAMINE OF 1932‒1933 IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN: FRAME ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SPEECHES OF THE REPUBLIC'S LEADERSHIP

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-3-65-74

Keywords:

Republic of Kazakhstan; politics of memory; political use of the past; frame analysis; narratives; famine of 1932-1933

Abstract

Using the past for political purposes is a powerful tool in the formation of identities. Post-Soviet countries demonstrate various strategies when dealing with the memory of the past. This article focuses on the political use of the topic of the famine of 1932-1933 in Kazakhstan. This topic is usually associated with Ukraine, however, starting from 2012, the famine of 1932-1933 has become one of the tools for shaping national identity in Kazakhstan. This article uses Yanow and van Hulst's dynamic frame analysis to determine the dynamics of famine framing in the speeches of Kazakhstan's presidents and their representatives. The central question of this article is how the famine of 1932-1933 is framed by the ruling elite, and what common and distinctive features can be identified through comparison with the famine framing in competing narratives. The analysis shows that the ruling elites of Kazakhstan present the famine as an artificially created tragedy without focusing on the culprit. The constructed official narrative thus differs from rival narratives in its diplomatic language. This both helps to maintain internal balance and avoids memory wars in the international arena, which distinguishes the case of Kazakhstan from the case of Ukraine.

Author Biography

E. A. Varfolomeev, National Research University "Higher School of Economics", Russia, Moscow

postgraduate student, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Politics and Administration, Graduate School of Political Science

References

Ассман, А. (2019) Длинная тень прошлого: Мемориальная культура и историческая политика. Москва, Новое литературное обозрение. [Assman, A. (2019) The Long Shadow of the Past: Memorial Culture and Historical Politics [Dlinnaja ten' proshlogo: Memorial'naja kul'tura i istoricheskaja politika]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. (In Russ.)].

Кондрашин, В. (2018) Голод 1932–1933 годов: трагедия российской деревни. Москва, Политическая энциклопедия. [Kondrashin, V. (2018) The famine of 1932‒1933: the tragedy of the Russian village [Golod 1932‒1933 godov: tragedija rossijskoj derevni], Moscow, Politicheska-ja jenciklopedija. (In Russ.)].

Кэмерон, С. (2020) Голодная степь: Голод насилие и создание Советского Казахстана. Москва, Новое литературное обозрение. [Cameron, S. (2020) The hungry steppe: famine, violence, and making of soviet Kazakhstan [Golodnaja step': Golod nasilie i sozdanie Sovetskogo Ka-zahstana]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russ.)].

Плотников, Д. (2018) ‘Изменения в политике памяти в государствах – союзниках России на постсоветском пространстве после 2014 года’, Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Политология, 1. [Plotnikov, D. (2018) ‘Changes in Sur-veillance Policy in Russia's Allied States in the Post-Soviet Space after 2014’ [Iz-menenija v politike pamjati v gosudarst-vah ‒ sojuznikah Rossii na postso-vetskom prostranstve posle 2014 goda], Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Serija: Politologija, 1. (In Russ.)].

Яноу, Д., ван Хульст, М. (2011) ‘Фреймы политического: от фрейм-анализа к анализу фреймирования’, Социологическое обозрение, 10 (1‒2), сс. 87–113. [Janou, D. i van Hulst, M. (2011) ‘Frames of the political: from frame analysis to framing analysis’ [Frejmy politicheskogo: ot frejm-analiza k analizu frejmirovanija], Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 10 (1‒2), рр. 87–113. (In Russ)].

Art, D. (2006) The Politics of the Nazi Past in Germany and Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coakley, J. (2012) Nationalism, Ethnicity and the State: Making and Breaking Nations. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781473915107.

Dixon, J. (2018) Dark Pasts: Changing the State’s Story in Turkey and Japan. Cornell University Press.

Finkel, E. (2010) ‘In Search of Lost Genocide: Historical Policy and International Politics in Post‒1989 Eastern Europe’, Global Society, 24(1), рp. 51–70, DOI:10.1080/13600820903432027.

Heisler, M. (2008) ‘The Political Currency of the Past: History, Memory, and Identity’, The Annals of the American Academy of Polit-ical and Social Science, 617, рр. 14–24, DOI: 10.1177/0002716208315024.

Malinova, O. (2021) ‘Politics of Memory and Na-tionalism’, Nationalities Papers, 49(6), рp. 997–1007, DOI: 10.1017/nps.2020.87.

Richter, J. (2019) ‘Famine, Memory, and Politics in the Post-Soviet Space: Contrasting Echoes of Collectivization in Ukraine and Kazakhstan’, Nationalities Papers, 48(3), рp. 476–491, DOI:10.1017/nps.2019.17.

Rutland, P. (2023) ‘Thirty Years of Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet States’, Nationalities Papers, 51(1), pр. 14–32, DOI:10.1017/nps.2021.94.

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Varfolomeev Е. А. (2023). INSTRUMENTALIZATION OF THE SUBJECT OF THE FAMINE OF 1932‒1933 IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN: FRAME ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SPEECHES OF THE REPUBLIC’S LEADERSHIP. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-3-65-74