ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE OF POLITICAL ACTOR: NATURAL OR SELF-LEARNING ORGANIZATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-2-15-25

Keywords:

оrganizational culture; political actor; biopolitics; natural organization; self-learning organization

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of organizational culture of political actors within the principles of natural and self-learning organization. The relevance of the subject is determined by the formation of the system of public authority, as well as the need to create conceptual stability in relation to the organizational culture of the political actor. As a result, the orientations of actors (be it the state or actors inside/outside the state) on confirmantropic or negantropic biopolitics may be developed. Methodologically, the article is based on the theory of organizational metaphors by G.Morgan, the approaches of P.Senge, F.Selznick, and the concept of biopolitics by M.Foucault.  Asserting the epistemological significance of the analytical separation of natural and self-learning organization in the analysis of actors, the authors assume that there is a duality and possible coexistence of these approaches in the study of the organizational culture of political actors. Such a phenomenon became possible due to the biopolitical revolution that leveled this gap. As a result, there is a paradoxical possibility of the formation of a negantropic biopolitics that denies the significant role of an autonomous individual and leadership, suggesting a rejection of the emergence of self-learning political actors.

Author Biographies

Yu. N. Frolova, Herzen University

Candidate of Political Science, Department of Political Science

M. V. Nevzorov, Herzen University

Candidate of Political Science, Department of Political Science

References

Арендт, Х. (2017) Vita Activa, или о деятельной жизни. Москва: Ад Маргинем Пресс. [Arendt, Kh. (2017) The Human Condi-tion [Vita Activa, ili o deyatel'noy zhiz-ni]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press (In Russ.)].

Батоврина, Е. В., Черняева, Г. В. (2018) ‘Принципы и ключевые направления формирования инновационной организационной культуры’, Известия Юго-Западного государственного университета. Серия: Экономика. Социология. Менеджмент, т. 8, 2 (27), cс. 196–202. [Batovrina, E. V. and Chernyayeva, G. V. (2018) ‘The principles and key directions of cultivating innovative organizational culture’ [Printsipy i klyuchevyye naprav-leniya formirovaniya innovatsion-noy organizatsionnoy kul’tury], Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo uni-versiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologi-ya. Menedzhment, vol. 8, 2 (27), pр. 196–202. (In Russ.)].

Ван Кревельд, М. (2006) Расцвет и упадок государства. Москва: ИРИСЭН. [Van Krevel'd, M. (2006) The Rise and Decline of the State [Rastsvet i upadok gosudarst-va]. Moscow: IRISEN (In Russ.)].

Гуторов, В. А. (2014) ‘К вопросу о происхождении государства: парадоксы и аномалии современных интерпретаций’, Полис, 3, cс. 91–110. [Gutorov, V. A. (2014) ‘To the Question of the Origin of State: Para-doxes and Anomalies of Modern Interpretations’ [K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii gosudarstva: paradoksy i anomalii sov-remennykh interpretatsii], Polis, 3, рp. 91–110. (In Russ.)].

Идрисова, А. Р. (2006) Формирование самообучающейся организации в системе государственного управления: дисс. … канд. соц. наук. Казань: КГТУ. [Idrisova, A. R. (2006) Formation of a self-learning organization in the public administration system [Formirovaniye samoobuchayushcheysya organizatsii v sisteme gosudarstvennogo upravleniya]. PhD Diss. Kazan’: KGTU. (In Russ.)].

Концевич, Г. Е. (2018) Анализ факторов и тенденций становления самообучающихся организаций в современной России. Майкоп: Магарин О. Г. [Kontsevich, G. E. (2018) [Analysis of factors and trends in the formation of self-learning organiza-tions in modern Russia [Analiz faktorov i tendentsiy stanovleniya sa-moobuchayushchikhsya organizatsiy v sovremennoy Rossii]. Maykop: Magarin O.G. (In Russ.)].

Лалу, Ф. (2020) Открывая организации будущего. Москва: МИФ [Laloux F. (2020) Reinventing organizations [Otkryvaya organizatsii budushchego]. Moscow: MIF. (In Russ.)].

Лимарев, П. В. (2022) ‘Информация как элемент управления в "бирюзовых" организациях’, Теоретическая экономика, 7(91), сс. 74–80. DOI 10.52957/22213260_2022_7_74. [Lima-rev, P. V. (2022) ‘Information as an ele-ment of management in teal organiza-tions’ [Informatsiya kak element uprav-leniya v "biryuzovykh" organizatsiyakh], Teoreticheskaya ekonomika, 7(91), pр. 74–80. (In Russ.)].

Невзоров, М. В., Фролова, Ю. Н. (2022) ‘Организационная культура политических акторов как перспективное направление исследования’, Государственное управление. Электронный вестник, 90 (февраль), сс. 156–171. DOI 10.24412/2070-1381-2022-90-156-171 [Nevzorov, M. V. and Frolova, Iu. N. (2022) ‘Organizational Culture of Politi-cal Actors as a Prospective Research Di-rection’ [Organizatsionnaia kul'tura politicheskikh aktorov kak perspektivnoe napravlenie issledovaniia], Gosudarstven-noe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik, 90, рp. 156–171. (In Russ.)].

Норт, Д. (1997) Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. Москва: Фонд экономической книги «Начала» [North, D. (1997) Institutions, Institutional Change and Eco-nomic Performance [Instituty, institutsional'nyye izmeneniya i funktsion-irovaniye ekonomiki]. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi “Nachala”. (In Russ.)].

Родионова, М. М., Смирнова, Н. М. (2022) ‘Корабль Тесея: трансформация понятия насилия в политической социальной теории’, Полития, 3 (106), cс. 6–27. DOI 10.30570/2078-5089-2022-106-3-6-27 [Rodionova, M. M. and Smirnova, N. M (2022) ‘The Ship of Theseus: Transformations of the Concept of Vio-lence in Political and Social Theory’ [Korabl' Teseia: transformatsiia poniatiia nasiliia v politicheskoi sotsial'noi teorii], Politiia, 3 (106), рp. 6–27. (In Russ.)].

Скочпол, Т. (2017) Государства и социальные революции. Москва, Изд-во Института Гайдара [Skochpol, T. (2017) States and Social Revolutions [Gosudarstva i sotsi-al'nyye revolyutsii]. Moscow: Izd-vo In-stituta Gaidara. (In Russ.)].

Сенге, П. (2018) Пятая дисциплина. Искусство и практика самообучающихся организаций. Москва: МИФ [Senge, P. (2018) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization [Pyataya distsiplina. Iskusstvo i praktika sa-moobuchayushchikhsya organizatsiy]. Moscow: MIF. (In Russ.)].

Тилли, Ч. (2009) Принуждение, капитал и европейские государства 990–1992 гг. Москва: Территория будущего [Tilli, Ch. (2009) Coercion, Capital, and Euro-pean States, AD 990–1990 [Prinuzhdeni-ye, kapital i yevropeyskiye gosudarstva 990–1992 gg.]. Moscow: Territoriia bu-dushchego. (In Russ.)].

Фуко, М. (2005) Нужно защищать общество. СПб.: Наука [Fuko, M. (2005) Il faut dé-fendre la société [Nuzhno zashchishchat' obshchestvo]. SPb.: Nauka. (In Russ.)].

Фуко, М. (2010) Рождение биополитики. СПб.: Наука [Fuko, M. (2010) Naissance de la biopolitique [Rozhdenie biopolitiki]. SPb.: Nauka. (In Russ.)].

Фуко, М. (2011) Безопасность, территория, население. СПб.: Наука [Fuko, M. (2011) Sécurité, territoire, population [Bezopasnost', territoriia, naselenie]. SPb.: Nauka. (In Russ.)].

Фуко, М. (2006) ‘Субъект и власть’ в: Фуко, М. Интеллектуалы и власть, ч. 3. Москва: Праксис, сс.161–190 [Fuko, M. (2006) ‘Subject and Power’ [Sub"ekt i vlast'] in: Fuko, M. Dits et écrits [Intellektualy i vlast'], сhast' 3. Moscow: Praksis, pр. 161–190. (In Russ.)].

Фукуяма, Ф. (2010) Конец истории и последний человек. Москва: АСТ; Полиграфиздат [Fukuiama, F. (2010) The End of History and the Last Man [Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek]. Moscow: AST; Poligrafizdat. (In Russ.)].

Хайдеггер, М. (2007) ‘Метафизика Ницше’ (1940) в: Хайдеггер, М. Ницше. Том II. Москва: Владимир Даль, сс. 225–350 [Khaidegger, M. (2007) ‘Nietzsches Metaphysik’ (1940) [Metafizika Nitsshe] in: Khaidegger, M. Nietzsche [Nitsshe]. Tom II. Moscow: Vladimir Dal', рp. 225–350. (In Russ.)].

Шеллинг, Т. (2007) Стратегия конфликта. Москва: ИРИСЭН [Shelling, T. (2007) The Strategy of Conflict [Strategiya kon-flikta]. Moscow: IRISEN. (In Russ.)].

Шмитт, К. (2006) Левиафан в учении о государстве Томаса Гоббса. СПб.: Владимир Даль [Shmitt, K. (2006) Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes [Leviafan v uchenii o gosudarstve Tomasa Gobbsa]. SPb.: Vladimir Dal'. (In Russ.)].

Яркеев, А. В., Попов, Д. В. (2022) ‘Биополитическая революция: pro et contra’, Полития, 2 (105), cс. 6–23. [Iar-keev, A. V. and Popov, D. V. (2022) ‘Bi-opolitical revolution: pro et contra’ [Bio-politicheskaia revoliutsiia: pro et contra]. Politiia, 2 (105), pр. 6–23. (In Russ.)].

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merton, R. K. (1940) ‘Bureaucratic structure and personality’, Social Forces, vol. 18, 4, рp. 560–568.

Morgan, G. (1997) Images of organization. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Selznick, P. (1948) ‘Foundations of the theory of organization’, American Sociological Re-view, vol. 13, 1, рp. 25–35.

Published

2023-07-13

How to Cite

Frolova Ю. Н., & Nevzorov М. В. (2023). ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE OF POLITICAL ACTOR: NATURAL OR SELF-LEARNING ORGANIZATION. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-2-15-25