URBAN IMMIGRATION POLICY: THE CASE OF LONDON

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-2-59-69

Keywords:

immigration; migration policy; urban policy; migrants; London; multi-level governance

Abstract

This paper examines the city of London's immigration policy. The author analyzes the strategies and main documents of London's migration policy and statements of the city authorities, as well as the key problems faced by the city administration. The article analyzes the reasons that encourage regional and local authorities to actively intervene in the process of shaping migration policy and adopt their own strategies of action. The author notes that the views of the London Administration and the British government on immigration policy often diverge; in particular, the London Administration actively defends the economic advantages of a more liberal migration policy. Special attention is paid to the proposition of devolution of migration policy to the regional level, which emphasizes that the city authorities view the national policy as ineffective. The author concludes that there is a gap between the actions of the national and local levels of government. The logic of urban development pushes local authorities to prioritize the economic benefits of immigration, which in the context of restrictive national policies leads to an independent urban immigration policy. The article reflects on the impact of local political processes on migration policy and migration processes.

Author Biography

E. A. Gorbunova, St. Petersburg State University

graduate student

References

Годованюк, К. А. (2020) ‘Проблемы регулирование иммиграции в Великобритании после брекзита’,Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН, 2, сc. 76‒82. [Godovanyuk, K. A. (2020) ‘Immigration Regulation Issues in the UK after Brexit’ [Problemy regulirovanie immigracii v Ve-likobritanii posle brekzita], Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Eu-rope RAS, 2, pp. 76‒82. (In Russ.)].

Охошин, О. В. (2020) ‘Миграционная политика Великобритании до и после брекзита’, Вестник РУДН. Серия: Политология, 22 (3), сc. 506‒516. [Okhoshin, O. V. (2020) ‘UK Migration Policy before and after Brexit’ [Migracionnaya politika Ve-likobritanii do i posle brekzita], RUDN Journal of Political Science, 22 (3), pp. 506‒516. (In Russ.)].

Adam, I. and Caponio, T. (2018) ‘Research on the multi-level governance of migration and migrant integration. Reversed pyra-mids’ in: Weinar, A., Bonjour, S. and Zhynormirska, L. (ed.) Routledge hand-book of the politics of migration in Eu-rope. London: Routledge, pр. 26‒37.

Biles, J. (2008) ‘Integration policies in English-speaking Canada’ in: Biles, J., Burstein, M. and Frideres, J. (ed.) Immigration and Integration in Canada in the Twenty-first Century. Kingston: Queen’s University, pр. 163‒166.

Broadhead, J. (2019) ‘The place of social integra-tion in policy making and practice at the Greater London Authority 2016-2019’, Hommes Et Migration, 1326, рp. 48‒57.

Consterdine, E. (2018) Labour's Immigration Pol-icy: The Making of the Migration State. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Gebhardt, D. (2014) Building Inclusive Cities: Challenges in the Multilevel Governance of Immigrant Integration in Europe. Washington D.C.: Migration Policy Institute.

Good, K. (2005) ‘Patterns of politics in Canada’s immigrant-receiving cities and suburbs: How immigrant settlement patterns shape the municipal role in multiculturalism policy’, Policy Studies, 26 (3‒4), pр. 261‒284.

Guiraudon, V. (2009) ‘The multi-level governance of international migration. An unbalanced act?’, Presentation at the Committee of the Regions Atelier, “Multi-level governance in the EU: New prospects for a European Union with its regions and cities”, October 7, 2009, Brus-sels.

Hadj Abdou, L. and Geddes, A. (2017) ‘Managing superdiversity? Examining the inter-cultural policy turn in Europe’, Policy & Politics, 45 (4), pр. 493‒510.

Meyers, E. (2000) ‘Theories of International Immigration Policy-A Comparative Analysis’, The International Migration Review, 34(4), 1245–1282.

Morris, M. (2020) Sanctuary cities? How regional mayors can protect victims of crime with insecure immigration status. Institute for Public Policy Research [online]. Availa-ble at: https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/sanctuary-cities (дата обращения: 21.01.2022).

Penninx, R. (2009) Decentralising integration policies: Managing migration in cities, regions and localities. London: Policy Net-work.

Portes, A. (2000) ‘Immigration and the Metropolis: Reflections on Urban History’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 1 (2), pр. 153‒175.

Schmidtke, O. (2014) ‘Beyond National Models? Governing migration and integration at the regional and local levels in Canada and Germany’, Comparative Migration Studies, 2 (1), pр. 77‒99.

Schönwälder, K. (2013) ‘Immigrant Representation in Germany’s Regional States: The Puzzle of Uneven Dynamics’, West Euro-pean Politics, 36 (3), pр. 634‒651.

Somerville, W. and Walsh, P. W. (2021) ‘United Kingdom’s Decades-Long Immigration Shift Interrupted by Brexit and the Pandemic’, Migration Policy [online]. Avail-able at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/united-kingdom-shift-immigration-interrupted-brexit-pandemic (дата обращения: 21.01.2022).

Sumption, M. (2017) Location, Location, Location: Should different parts of the UK have different immigration policies? Migration Observatory report, University of Oxford.

Thouez, C. (2018) ‘Strengthening migration governance: the UN as ‘wingman’’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45 (8), pр. 1242‒1257.

Vertovec, S. (1996) ‘Berlin Multikulti. Germany, foreigners and “world-openness’, New Community, 22 (3), pр. 381‒399.

Zapata-Barrero, R., Caponio, T. and Scholten, P. (2017) ‘Theorizing the ‘local turn’ in a multi-level governance framework of analysis: a case study in immigrant poli-cies’, International Review of Administra-tive Sciences, 38 (2), pр. 241‒246.

Published

2022-07-11

How to Cite

Gorbunova Е. А. (2022). URBAN IMMIGRATION POLICY: THE CASE OF LONDON. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-2-59-69