ENVIRONMENTAL IDENTITY AS A TOOL FOR CRISIS MANAGEMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-2-14-26

Keywords:

environmental identity; environmental policy; crisis management; environmental discourses; politicized environmental identity

Abstract

Climate change, consumerism, and the decline of biodiversity may indicate a disruption of the fragile balance of nature and the onset of a systemic ecological crisis. Environmental degradation is forcing the search for new patterns in the relations between humans and the natural environment. Based on the analysis of scientific discourses on the societal dimension of crisis and development concepts, the article examines the role of environmental identity in anti-crisis management. A large number of studies are devoted to the analysis of its nature, methods of formation and measurement, but the potential of the category itself as a way to solve practical problems remains understudied. The importance of examining environmental identity in political science is determined by its explanatory potential of the political process around environmental issues. The article shows that the formation of individual environmental identity and the consistent transition from cognitive to active component contributes to the emergence of group environmental identity, which may subsequently acquire a politicized form. While collective politicized identity has a direct influence on the decision-making process, environmental identity acts as a self-regulator of individual behavior. Whereas pro-environmental behavior reduces environmental burdens, which can further contribute to resolving the crisis and/or mitigating its consequences.

Author Biography

T. I. Khaynatskaya, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Science

Junior Research Fellow

References

Ашхамаф, А. Р. (2010) ‘Экологическое сознание: к проблеме определения понятия’, Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета, Серия 1: Регионоведение: философия, история, социология, юриспруденция, политология, культурология, (3), cc. 15–18. [Ashkhamaf, A. R. (2010) ‘Ecological consciousness: to the problem of defining the concept’ [Ekologicheskoe soznanie: k probleme opredeleniya ponyatiya], Bulletin of Ady-geya State University, Series 1: Regional Studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Science, Cultural Studies, (3) pp. 15–18. (In Russ.)].

Грачев, В. А. (2015) ‘Учение В. И. Вернадского о ноосфере как основа устойчивого развития’. Юг России: экология, развитие, 10(3), cc. 16–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2015-3-16-23. [Grachev, V. A. (2015) ‘Vernad-sky's V.I. theory of noosphere as the basis for sustainable development’ [Uchenie V. I. Vernadskogo o noosfere kak osnova ustojchivogo razvitiya], South of Russia: ecology, development, 10(3) pp. 16–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2015-3-16-23 (In Russ.)].

Дерябо, С. Д., Ясвин, В. А. (1996) Экологическая педагогика и психология. Ростов-на-Дону: «Феникс» [Deryabo, S. D., Yasvin, V. A. (1996) Environmental Ped-agogy and Psychology [Ekologicheskaya pedagogika i psihologiya], Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix (In Russ.)].

Пантин, В. И. (2017) ‘Коллективные и групповые идентичности’ в: Семененко, И. C. (ред.) Идентичность: Личность, общество, политика. Энциклопедическое издание, Москва: «Весь Мир», cс. 271–274. [Pantin, V. I. (2017) ‘Collective and Group Identities’ [Kollektivnye i gruppovye identichnosti] in: Semenenko, I. S. (eds) Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. Encyclopedic Edition [Iden-tichnost': Lichnost', obshchestvo, politi-ka. Enciklopedicheskoe izdanie]. Mos-cow: «Ves' Mir», рp. 271–274. (In Russ.)].

Короткова, А. В. (2020) ‘Экодвижение «Пятницы ради будущего»: первые итоги’, Мировая экономика и Международные отношения, 64(4), cc. 119–131. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-4-119-131. [Korotkova, A. V. (2020) Eco-Movement «Fridays for Future»: The First Results [Ekodvizhenie «Pyatnicy radi budush-chego»: pervye itogi], World Economy and International Relations, 64(4), pp. 119–131. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-4-119-131 (In Russ.)].

Конашев, М. Б. (2019) ‘Эволюционная теория, экологический кризис и экономика’, Россия: тенденции и перспективы раз-вития, 14(1), cc. 113–118. [Konashev, M. B. (2019) ‘Evolutionary Theory, the Ecological Crisis, and Economics’ [Evolyucionnaya teoriya, ekologicheskij krizis i ekonomika], Russia: Trends and Development Prospects, 14(1), pp. 113–118. (In Russ.)].

Кудрявцева, В. И., Мельник, Н. Б., Циплакова, Ю. В., Язовская, О. В. (2017) ‘Антропоцентризм vs биоэкоцентризм: анализ экологического сознания молодежи’, Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 3: Общественные науки, vol. 170, 19(4), cc. 46–56. [Kudriavtseva, V. I., Melnik, N. B., Tsiplakova, U. V., Yazovskaya, O. V. (2017) ‘Anthropocentrism vs bioecocen-trism: an analysis of young people’s eco-logical consciousness’ [Antropocentrizm vs bioekocentrizm: analiz ekologicheskogo soznaniya molodezhi], Izvestia Ural Federal University. Series 3: Social Sci-ences, vol. 170, 19(4), pp. 46–56. (In Russ.)].

Олейников, Ю. В., Борзова, Т. В. (2007) ‘Сущность и содержание глобального антропогенного экологического кризиса’, Юг России: экология, развитие, (4), cc. 16–24. [Olejnikov, U. V., & Borzova, T. V. (2007) ‘The essence and content of the global anthropogenic ecological crisis’ [Sushchnost' i soderzhanie global'nogo antropogennogo ekologicheskogo krizisa], The South of Russia: ecology, develop-ment, (4), pp. 16–24. (In Russ.)].

Семененко, И. С. (2019) ‘Горизонты ответственного развития: от научного дискурса к политическому управлению’, Полис. Политические исследования, (3), cc. 7–26. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02. [Semenenko, I. S. (2019) ‘Horizons of Respon-sible Development: from Discourse to Governance’ [Gorizonty otvetstvennogo razvitiya: ot nauchnogo diskursa k politicheskomu upravleniyu], Polis. Polit-ical Studies, (3), pp. 7–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02 (In Russ.)].

Терешина, М. В., Башмаков, И. С. (2017) ‘Эко-логическая идентичность местных сообществ как ресурс развития «Зеленой» экономики’, Человек, Сooбщество. Управление, 18(1), cc. 6–16. [Tereshina, M. V., Bashmakov, I. S. (2017) ‘Ecological identity of local communities as a re-source of “Green” economy develop-ment’ [Ekologicheskaya identichnost' mestnyh soobshchestv kak resurs razviti-ya «Zelenoj» ekonomiki], Human. Com-munity. Governance, 18(1), pp. 6–16. (In Russ.)].

Хайнацкая, Т. И. (2021) ‘Формирование экологической идентичности в Германии и Италии: акторы и практики’, Современная Европа, (6), cc. 201‒210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope62021201210 [Khaynatskaya, T. I. (2021) ‘The shaping of environmental identity in Germany and Italy: actors and practic-es’ [Formirovanie ekologicheskoj iden-tichnosti v Germanii i Italii: aktory i praktiki], Modern Europe, (6), cc. 201‒210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope62021201210 (In Russ.)].

Яницкий, О. Н. (2007) Экологическая культура. Москва: Наука. [Yanickij, O. N. (2007) Environmental Culture [Ekologicheskaya kul'tura]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)].

Alastair, B. (2006) ‘The Americanisation of Anti-Racism? Global Power and Hegemony in Ethnic Equity’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(7), pp. 1083–1103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830600821778.

Aydurmus, D. (2016) ‘Survival Despite the People: Democratic Destruction or Sustainable Meritocracy’, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform [online]. Availa-ble at:https://www.researchgate.net/publicati-on/330578951_Survival_Despite_the_People_Democratic_Destruction_or_Sustainable_Meritocracy (Accessed: 10 February 2022).

Beeson, M. (2010) ‘The coming of environmen-tal authoritarianism’, Environmental Poli-tics, 19(2), pp. 276–294. DOI: 10.1080/09644010903576918.

Bentley, J. H. (2013) ‘Environmental Crises in World History’, Procedia ¬¬¬- Social and Behavior Science, 77, pp. 108–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.067.

Booth, D. E. (2021) ‘Post-materialism’s Social Class Divide: Experiences and Life Satis-faction’, Journal of Human Values, 27(2), pp. 141–160. DOI: 10.1177/0971685820946180.

Devall, B. (1982) ‘Ecological consciousness and ecological resisting: Guidelines for com-prehension and research’, Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 9(2), pp 177–196.

Dono, J, Webb, J., Richardson, B. (2010) ‘The relationship between environmental ac-tivism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), pp. 178–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.006.

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., Emmet Jones, R. (2000) “Measuring en-dorsement of the new ecological para-digm: A revised NEP scale, Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), pp. 425–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176.

The Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit (2021) Taking stock: A global assessment of net zero targets [online]. Available at: https://ca1-eci.edcdn.com/reports/ECIU-Ox-ford_Taking_Stock.pdf?mtime=20210323005817&focal=none (Accessed: 27 April 2022) Eurobarometer:

Climate Change. (2021) European Union [online]. Availa-ble at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2273 (Accessed: 2 March 2022).

Fielding, K. S., Hornsey, M. J. (2016) ‘A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities’, Frontiers in Psychology, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121.

Grey, W. (1993) ‘Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology’, Australiasian Journal of Philos-ophy, 71(4), pp. 463–475. DOI: 10.1080/00048409312345442.

Arnold, H. E., Cohen, F. G., Warner. A. (2009) ‘Youth and Environmental Action: Per-spectives of Young Environmental Lead-ers on Their Formative Influences’, The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), pp. 27–36. DOI: 10.3200/JOEE.40.3.27-36.

Hay, C. (2007) Why we Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Inglehart, R. (1995) ‘Public Support for Envi-ronmental Protection: Objective Prob-lems and Subjective Values in 43 Socie-ties’ PS: Political Science and Politics, 28 (1), pp. 57–72. DOI:10.2307/420583.

Clayton, S., Opotow, S. (eds.) (2003) Identity and the Natural Environment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Clayton, S., Irkhin, B., Nartova-Bochaver, S. (2019) ‘Environmental Identity in Rus-sia: Validation and Relationship to the Concern for People and Plants’. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 16(1), pp. 85–107. DOI: 16. 10.17323/1813-8918-2019-1-85-107.

Iizuka, M. (2000) Role of Environmental Aware-ness in Achieving Sustainable Develop-ment. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3156.6484.

Klandermans, P. G. (2014) ‘Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest’, Political Psychology, 35(1), pp. 1–22.

Kulin, J., Sevä, I. (2021) ‘Quality of government and the relationship between environ-mental concern and pro-environmental behavior: a cross-national study’, Envi-ronmental Politics, 30(5), pp. 727–752. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2020.1809160.

Mailam, M. W., Pitsoe, V. J. (2012) ‘Globaliza-tion, Sustainability and Ethics: What are the Critical Links for Present and Future Generations?’, Journal of Human Ecolo-gy, 40(1), pp. 43–51. DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2012.11906522.

Marris, E. (2019) ‘Why young climate activists have captured the world’s attention’, Na-ture [online]. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02696-0 (Accessed: 15 March 2022).

Marshall, B. K. (1999) ‘Globalisation, Environ-mental Degradation and Ulrich Beck’s Risk Society’, Environmental Values, 8(2), pp. 253–275.

Matsuba, M. K., Pratt, M. W., Norris, J. E., Mohle, E., Alisat, S., McAdams, D. P. (2012) ‘Environmentalism as a context for expressing identity and generativity: patterns among activists and uninvolved youth and midlife adults’, Journal of per-sonality, 80(4), pp.1091–1115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00765.x.

Mikuła, A., Raczkowska, M., Utzig, M. (2021) ‘Pro-Environmental Behaviour in the Eu-ropean Union Countries’, Energies, 14, p. 5689. DOI: 10.3390/en14185689.

McShane, K. (2016) ‘Anthropocentrism in Cli-mate Ethics and Policy’. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 40(1), pp. 189–204. DOI:10.1111/misp.12055.

Pew Research Center (2021) ‘Gen Z, Millennials Stand Out for Climate Change Activism, Social Media Engagement with Issue’, Pew Research Center [online]. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/05/26/gen-z-millennials-stand-out-for-climate-change-activism-social-media-engagement-with-issue/ (Accessed: 20 March 2022).

Ratiu, C. Anderson, B. (2014) ‘The identity crisis of sustainable development’, World Jour-nal of Science, 11. DOI: 10.1108/WJSTSD-08-2013-0033.

Riechers, M., Á., Balázsi, Abson, D. J., Fischer, J. (2020) ‘The influence of landscape change on multiple dimensions of hu-man–nature connectedness’, Ecology and Society 25(3), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11651-250303.

Ross, A. D., Rouse, S. M. and Mobley, W. (2019) ‘Polarization of Climate Change Beliefs: The Role of the Millennial Generation Identity’, Social Science Quarterly, 100 pp. 2625–2640. DOI:10.1111/ssqu.12640.

Sengupta, S. (2020) ‘How Europe Turned into a Perfect Landscape for Wildfires’, The New York Times [online]. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/05/climate/forests-europe-climate-changed.html (Accessed: 15 March 2022).

Stern, P. C. (2000) ‘Theory of environmentally significant behavior’, Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), pp. 407–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175.

Thomashow, M. (1995) Ecological identity: Be-coming a reflective environmentalist. Cambridge: MIT Press.

UNEP (2019) ‘Global Environment Outlook 6’, UNEP [online]. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6?_ga=2.75305813.633314003.1647342880-1682040374.1645095995 (Accessed: 27 April 2022).

UNEP (2019) ‘Environmental Rule of Law: First Global Report’, UNEP [online]. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/assessment/environmental-rule-law-first-global-report (Accessed: 27 April 2022).

Vandenbergh, M. P., Cohen. M. A. (2010) ‘Cli-mate Change Governance: Boundaries and Leakage’, 18 New York University Environmental Law Journal, p. 221.

Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T. et al. (2020) ‘Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nat Commun’, 11, p. 3107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y.

Published

2022-07-11

How to Cite

Khaynatskaya Т. И. (2022). ENVIRONMENTAL IDENTITY AS A TOOL FOR CRISIS MANAGEMENT. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-2-14-26