INFORMATION OPENNESS OF PUBLIC ADVISORY COUNCILS IN ST. PETERSBURG: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONS

Authors

Keywords:

public advisory councils, information openness, public policy, qualitative comparative analysis

Abstract

Information openness of public advisory councils is an important but underexplored indicator of their role in public policy. It reflects their activities, as well as the feedback mechanisms between citizens and councils. Scholars point out low information quality on federal and regional levels, but the reasons behind that rarely studied, especially from a comparative perspective. This paper attempts to fill in this gap by revealing the conditions leading to greater information openness. The authors choose St. Petersburg as a case and gather a dataset on 46 public councils. The key research method is the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. The framework is built on two expectations: the impact of councils’ autonomy (in website management and general organization) and the role of councils (“intermediary” or “expert”) on information openness.Due to several limitations, the results have not revealed any conditions which can be considered a guarantee for better openness. However, the preliminary conclusion is that the differences in autonomy and roles are important conditions. The autonomy of councils seems to be the most crucial factor. A valuable contribution of this paper is the framework of analysis that can be used for other cases and research strategies.DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2021-2-129-141

Author Biographies

Илья Вяткин / Ilia Viatkin, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg

student of the educational program "Political Science and World Politics"

Юрий Кабанов / Yuriy Kabanov, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Political Science and International Relations

Михаил Карягин / Mikhail Karyaginm, Center for Current Politics, Moscow

leading expert

Станислав Кукарцев / Stanislav Kukartsev, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg

student of the educational program "Political Science and World Politics"

Павел Миронов / Pavel Mironov, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg

student of the educational program "Political Science and World Politics"

References

Батуев, А. Д., Комин, М. О., Коробкин, Е. Н. (2020) Открытость Общественных советов при федеральных органах исполнительной власти в России. Москва: Счетная палата Российской Федерации, Центр перспективных управленческих решений, 36 с. [Batuev, A. D., Komin, M. O., Korobkin, E. N. (2020) The Openness of Public Councils under Federal Executive Bodies in Russia [Otkrytost' Obshchestvennyh sovetov pri federal'nyh organah ispolnitel'noj vlasti v Rossii]. Moscow: Accounts Chamber of Russian Federation, Center for Advanced Governance, 36 p. (In Russ.)].

Горный, М. Б. (2011) ‘Общественные консультативные структуры при органах власти: опыт Санкт-Петербурга’, Телескоп: журнал социологических и маркетинговых исследований, 2(86), сc. 14–24. [Gornyj, M. B. (2011) ‘Public Consultative Structures under the Government: Experience of St. Petersburg’ [Obshchestvennye konsul'tativnye struktury pri organah vlasti: opyt Sankt-Peterburga], Teleskop: zhurnal sociologicheskih i marketingovyh issledovanij, 2(86), pp. 14–24. (In Russ.)].

Дьякова, Е. Г., Трахтенберг, А. Д. (2019) ‘Общественные советы при органах исполнительной власти: эксперты, контролеры или мирские челобитчики?’, Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 6(154), сс. 180–201. [D'yakova, E. G., Trahtenberg, A. D. (2019) ‘Public Councils under the Executive Branch: Experts, Supervisors, or Worldly Petitioners?’ [Obshchestvennye sovety pri organah ispolnitel'noj vlasti: eksperty, kontrolery ili mirskie chelobitchiki?], Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 6(154), pp. 180–201. (In Russ.)].

Дьякова, Е. Г. (2018) ‘Формирование системы общественных советов при региональных органах исполнительной власти: экспертиза или представительство?’, XXI Уральские социологические чтения. Социальное пространство и время региона: проблемы устойчивого развития. Екатеринбург: Гуманитарный университет, 21, сс. 189–192. [D'yakova, E. G. (2018) ‘Formation of a System of Public Councils under Regional Executive Authorities: Expertise or Representation?’ [Formirovanie sistemy obshchestvennyh sovetov pri regional'nyh organah ispolnitel'noj vlasti: ekspertiza ili predstavitel'stvo?], XXI Ural Sociological Readings. Social space and time of the region: problems of sustainable development. Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyj universitet, 21, pp. 189–192. (In Russ.)].

Зеленский, П. А. (2018) ‘Эффективность работы общественных советов при органах государственной власти как показатель правовой культуры общества’, Правовая культура, 4, cc. 69–78. [Zelenskij, P. A. (2018) ‘The Effectiveness of the Work of Public Councils under State Authorities as an Indicator of the Legal Culture of Society’ [Effektivnost' raboty obshchestvennyh sovetov pri organah gosudarstvennoj vlasti kak pokazatel' pravovoj kul'tury obshchestva], The Legal Culture, 4, pp. 69–78. (In Russ.)].

Кабанов, Ю. А., Карягин, М. Е. (2015) “Необитаемые острова” открытости: проблемы открытых государственных данных в России’, Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС, 11(4), сс. 38–51. [Kabanov, Y. A., Karyagin, M. E. (2015) “Uninhabited Islands” of Openness: Problems of Open State Data in Russia’ [“Neobitaemye ostrova” otkrytosti: problemy otkrytyh gosudarstvennyh dannyh v Rossii’], Political expertise: POLITEX, 11(4), pp. 38–51. (In Russ.)].

Кабанов, Ю. А. (2020) ‘Публичная политика в гибридных режимах: обзор исследований’, Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Политология, 14(2), сс. 142–150. [Kabanov, Y. A. (2020) ‘Public Policy in Hybrid Regimes: A Review’ [Publichnaya politika v gibridnyh rezhimah: obzor issledovanij], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 14(2), pp. 142–150. (In Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2020-2-142-150.

Карягин, М. Е. (2017) ‘Информационная открытость деятельности экспертных со-обществ на примере общественных советов при федеральных органах исполнительной власти РФ’, в: Ясин, Е. Г. (ред.) XVII Апрельская международная научная конференция по проблемам развития экономики и общества. Москва: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики., кн. 2, сс. 145–151. [Karyagin, M. E. (2017) ‘Information Openness of the Activities of Expert Communities on the Example of Public Councils under the Federal Executive Bodies of the Russian Federation’ [Informacionnaya otkrytost' deyatel'nosti ekspertnyh soobshchestv na primere obshchestvennyh sovetov pri federal'nyh organah ispolnitel'noj vlasti RF], in: Yasin, E. G. (ed.) XVII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publishing House., b. 2, pp. 145–151 (In Russ.)].

Петрова, Л. А., Сунгуров, А. Ю. (2012) ‘Институты-посредники между органами власти и обществом: Случай Санкт-Петербурга’, Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления, (2), сс. 78–96. [Petrova, L. A., Sungurov, A. Y. (2012) ‘Mediators Institutes between Government and Society: Case of Saint-Petersburg’ [Instituty-posredniki mezhdu organami vlasti i obshchestvom: Sluchaj Sankt-Peterburga], Public Administration Issues, (2), pp. 78–96. (In Russ.)].

Руденко, В. Н. (2007) ‘Консультативные общественные советы в системе делиберативной демократии’, Сравнительное конституционное обозрение, 4(61), сс. 116–124. [Rudenko, V. N. (2007) ‘Public Advisory Councils in the System of Deliberative Democracy’ [Konsul'tativnye obshchestvennye sovety v sisteme deliberativnoj demokratii], Comparative Constitutional Review, 4(61), pp. 116–124. (In Russ.)].

Сулимов, К. А. (2018) ‘Консультативно-совещательные органы в современной России: субъектность без автономии?’, Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Политология, 12(3), cc. 88–102. [Sulimov, K. А. (2018) ‘Consultative and Advisory Bodies in Modern Russia: Agency without Autonomy?’ [Konsul'tativno-soveshchatel'nye organy v sovremennoj Rossii: sub"ektnost' bez avtonomii?], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 12(3), pp. 88–102. (In Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2018-3-88-102.

Сулимов, К. А., Титова, С. Р. (2016) ‘Консультативно-совещательные органы по межнациональным отношениям в со-временной России: представление базы данных’, Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Политология, 4, сс. 150–167. [Sulimov, K. A., Titova, S. R. (2016) ‘Consultative and Advisory Bodies for Interethnic Relations in Modern Russia: Introducing a Database’ [Konsul'tativno-soveshchatel'nye organy po mezhnacional'nym otnosheniyam v sovremennoj Rossii: predstavlenie bazy dannyh], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 4, pp. 150–167. (In Russ.)].

Сунгуров, А. Ю., Дубровский, Д. В., Карягин, М. Е., Тиняков, Д. К (2020) ‘Общественно-консультативные советы как форма вовлечения экспертного знания в процесс политико-управленческих решений (на примере г. Санкт-Петербурга)’, Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления, 2, сс. 7–31. [Sungurov, A. Y., Dubrovsky, D. V., Karyagin, M. E., Tiniakov, D. K (2020) ‘Public Consulatative Councils as a Way of Involving Expert Knowledge in Policy Decision Process (Case of St. Petersburg)’ [Obshchestvenno-konsul'tativnye sovety kak forma vovlecheniya ekspertnogo znaniya v process politiko-upravlencheskih reshenij (na primere g. Sankt-Peterburga)], Public Administration Issues, 2, pp. 7–31. (In Russ.)].

Сунгуров, А. Ю. (2013) ‘Общественные советы как институты мониторинговой демократии? Опыт Краснодарского края’, Социум и власть, 6 (44), сс. 48–54. [Sungurov, A. Y. (2013) ‘Public Councils as Institutions of Monitoring Democracy? Experience of the Krasnodar Krai’ [Obshchestvennye sovety kak instituty monitoringovoj demokratii? Opyt Krasnodarskogo kraya], Society and Power, 6 (44), pp. 48–54. (In Russ.)].

Сунгуров, А. Ю., Карягин М. Е. (2017) ‘Российское экспертное сообщество и власть: основные формы взаимодействия’, Полис, 3, сс. 144–159. [Sun-gurov, A. Y., Karyagin, M. E. (2017) ‘Russian Expert Community and Government: Main Forms of Interaction’ [Rossijskoe ekspertnoe soobshchestvo i vlast': osnovnye formy vzaimodejstviya], Polis. Political Studies, 3, pp. 144–159. (In Russ.)]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.03.10.

Duşa, A. (2019) QCA with R: A comprehensive resource. New York: Springer International Publishing.

Kabanov, Y., Karyagin M. and Romanov V. (2017) ‘Politics of Open Data in Russia: Regional and Municipal Perspectives’ in: Kumar, T.V. (ed.) E-Democracy for Smart Cities. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Singapore: Springer, pp. 461–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4035-1_15.

Kabanov, Y. and Chugunov, A. V. (2017) ‘Electronic “Pockets of Effectiveness”: E-governance and Institutional Change in St. Petersburg, Russia’ in: Janssen, M. et al. (ed.) International Conference on Electronic Government. Springer, Cham, LNCS, vol. 10428, pp. 386–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_32.

Knox, C. and Janenova, S. (2018) ‘Public councils in Kazakhstan: a case of emergent participative democracy?’, Central Asian Survey, (37)2, pp. 305–321. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2017.1410467.

Krick, E., Christensen, J. and Holst, C. (2019) ‘Between ‘Scientization’ and a ‘Participatory Turn’. Tracing shifts in the governance of policy advice’, Science and Public Policy, 46(6), pp. 927–939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz040.

Owen, C. and Bindman, E. (2017) ‘Civic participation in a hybrid regime: Limited pluralism in policymaking and delivery in contemporary Russia’, Government and Opposition, 54(1), pp. 98–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2017.13.

Ragin, C. C. (2006) ‘Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage’, Political analysis, 14(3), pp. 291–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019.

Ragin, C. C. (2009) ‘Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA)’ in: Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C. C. (ed.) Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 87–121.

Schneider, C. Q. and Wagemann, C. (2007) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

Schneider C. Q. and Wagemann, C. (2010) ‘Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzysets’, Comparative Sociology, 9(3), pp. 397–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210x12493538729793.

Tavares, A. F. and da Cruz, N. F. (2017) ‘Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework’, Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005.

Yavuz, N. and Welch, E. W. (2014) ‘Factors af-fecting openness of local government websites: Examining the differences across planning, finance and police de-partments’, Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), pp. 574–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.004

Downloads

Published

2021-07-03

How to Cite

Ilia Viatkin И. В. /, Yuriy Kabanov Ю. К. /, Mikhail Karyaginm М. К. /, Stanislav Kukartsev С. К. /, & Pavel Mironov П. М. /. (2021). INFORMATION OPENNESS OF PUBLIC ADVISORY COUNCILS IN ST. PETERSBURG: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(2), 129–141. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/4617

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021): Вестник Пермского университета. Политология / Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science

Section

Статьи

License

The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).

The author agrees to the processing of personal data.

The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.

There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.

The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:

a.     The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.

b.     The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.

c.     d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).

Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.

The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru

The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.