DYNAMICS OF THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL IDENTITY IN DEBATES ON EURO-ATLANTIC INTEGRATION

Authors

Keywords:

discourse analysis, Euro-Atlantic integration, national identity, paradox approach, qualitative methods, Ukraine

Abstract

This paper analyses changes of meanings of identity in competing projects of national identity in case of debates among the Ukrainian elites on the issue of Euro-Atlantic integration in 2008 and 2018. The author identifies three projects of identity, which are based on a different understanding of foreign policy in relation to Euro-Atlantic integration. The most significant change of identity is the dominant position of the pro-Euro-Atlantic discourse that was contested in 2008 by the opponents of NATO membership. However, after the transformation of the political context in Ukraine in the post-2014 period, some representatives of the elites continue to support the project of identity in which Ukraine is constructed as a non-bloc state. In both periods the elites reach a consensus on Ukraine's representation as a European and democratic country. Despite changes in the domestic and international contexts, discursive representations of Ukraine as a victim and a colonial state, where Russia or the United States presented as aggressors and colonizers, continue to exist. The changes in dynamics of national identity are as follows: expansion of an identity representation on a larger audience, a “shift” of a representation into another category within the same discourse, and “borrowing” and adoption of a representation by competing identity discourses.DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2021-2-59-70

Author Biography

Ирина Жирун / Iryna Zhyrun, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow

PhD student of Doctoral School of Political Science, visiting scholar at Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs,Department of Politics and Governance

References

Ефемищ, Н. М. (2018) ‘Прошлое в конструировании национальной идентичности: гранд-нарративы Украины’, Вестник Пермского Университета. Политология, 2, pp. 77–90. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2018-2-77-90. [Yefimishch, N. M. (2018) ‘The past in constructing national identity: Grand narratives of Ukraine’ [Proshloe v konstruitovanii natsionalnoy identichnosti: grand-narrativy Ukrainy], Review of Polit-ical Science, 2, pp. 77–90 (In Russ.)].

Жирун, И. В. (2019) ‘Изменение, сдвиг или трансформация: aнализ методологических подходов к исследованию национальной идентичности’, Вестник Пермского Университета. Политология, 13(3), pp. 68–77. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2019-3-68-77. [Zhyrun, I. V. (2019) ‘Change, shift or transformation: analysis of methodological approaches to national identity re-search’ [Izmenenie, sdvig ili transformatsia: analiz metodologicheskikh pod-khodov k issledovaniju natsionalnoy identichnosti], Review of Political Science, 13 (3), pp. 68–77 (In Russ.)].

Burant, S. R. (1995) ‘Foreign Policy and National Identity: A Comparison of Ukraine and Belarus’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 47, 7, pp. 1125–1144.

Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C. (2002) ‘Introduction: themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse’, in: Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C. (eds) Politics as text and talk: analytic approaches to political discourse. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–41.

De Cellia, R., Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (1999) ‘The discursive construction of national identities’, Discourse and Society, 10(2), pp. 149–173.

Diez, T. (1999) ‘Speaking’ Europe’: the politics of integration discourse’, Journal of Eu-ropean Public Policy, 6(4), pp. 598–613.

Doty, R. L. (1993) ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines’, International Studies Quar-terly, 37 (3), pp. 297–320.

Dunn, K. C. (2008) ‘Historical Representations’ in: Klotz, A., Prakash, D. (eds.) Qualita-tive Methods in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 78–92.

Klotz, A. and Lynch, C. (2007) ‘Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations’. New York and London: M.E. Sharpe.

Korostelina, K. V. (2014) ‘Conflict of national narratives of Ukraine Euromaidan and beyond’, Die Friedens-Warte, 89(1/2), pp. 269–290.

Kulyk, V. (2016) ‘National Identity in Ukraine: Impact of Euromaidan and the War (b)’, Europe - Asia Studies, 68(4), pp. 588–608. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1174980.

Kulyk, V. (2017) ‘Identity in Transformation: Russian-speakers in Post-Soviet Ukraine’, Europe-Asia Studies, 71(1), pp. 156–178.

Kuzio, T. (2001) ‘Identity and Nation-Building in Ukraine: Defining the ‘other’’, Eth-nicities 1 (3), pp. 343–65.

Melnykovska, I., Schweickert, R. and Kosti-uchenko, T. (2011) ‘Balancing National Uncertainty and Foreign Orientation: Identity Building and the Role of Politi-cal Parties in Post-Orange Ukraine’, Eu-rope - Asia Studies, 63 (6), pp. 1055–1072.

Milliken, J. (1999) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European journal of international relations, 5(2), pp. 225–254.

Molchanov, M. A. (2002) ‘National Identity and Foreign Policy Orientation in Ukraine’, in: Kuzio, T., Molchanov M.A. and Moroney J. (eds.) Ukrainian Foreign and Security Policy: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Westport: Praeger. 227–263.

Nikulin, V., Selyutina, V. (2007) ‘Geopolitical Orientations of Ukrainian Political Elites and the Electoral Campaign of 2006’, Perspectives on European Politics and So-ciety, 8 (4), pp. 544–558.

Orlova, D. (2017) ‘“Europe” as a Normative Model in the Mediatised Discourse of Ukrainian Political Elites’, Europe - Asia Studies. Routledge, 69(2), pp. 222–241. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2017.1295302.

Pop-Eleches, G., & Robertson, G. B. (2018) ‘Identity and political preferences in Ukraine–before and after the Euromaidan’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 34(2–3), pp. 107–118.

Prizel, I. (1998) National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Vol. 103. Cambridge University Press.

Rumelili, B., Todd, J. (2018) ‘Paradoxes of identity change: Integrating macro, meso, and micro research on identity in conflict processes’, Politics, 38(1), pp. 3–18. doi: 10.1177/0263395717734445.

Shulman, S. (2002) ‘The Internal-External Nexus in the Formation of Ukrainian National Identity: The Case for Slavic Integration’ in: Kuzio, T. and D’Anieri, P. (eds.) Di-lemmas of State-Led Nation Building in Ukraine, Praeger, pp. 103–129.

Shyrokykh, K. (2018) ‘The Evolution of the Foreign Policy of Ukraine: External Actors and Domestic Factors’, Europe-Asia Stud-ies, 70 (5), pp. 832–850.

White, S. and Feklyunina, V. (2014) Identities and foreign policies in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. Other Europes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

White, S., McAllister, I. and Feklyunina, V. (2010) ‘Belarus, Ukraine and Russia: East or West?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12(3), pp. 344–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00410.x.

Zhurzhenko, T. (2014) ‘A Divided Nation? Reconsidering the Role of Identity Politics in the Ukraine Crisis’, Die Friedens-Warte, 89(1/2), pp. 249–267.

Published

2021-07-03

How to Cite

Iryna Zhyrun И. Ж. /. (2021). DYNAMICS OF THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL IDENTITY IN DEBATES ON EURO-ATLANTIC INTEGRATION. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(2), 59–70. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/4610