AUTHORITIES IN A MONO-INDUSTRIAL TOWN: TRAJECTORIES OF CHANGE

Authors

Keywords:

power, mono-industrial company town, city-forming enterprise, urban politics, mayor, urban regimes

Abstract

This article presents the outcomes of empirical research in the mono-industrial town in the Perm region. This research is a part of the empirical survey conducted in five Russian towns in the Perm, Ivanovo, and Tambov regions in 2011–2015 and 2018–2019 through in-depth interviews with local politicians, public officials, entrepreneurs, and local and regional experts. The purpose of the study was to identify and evaluate changes that occurred in the power relations in a mono-industrial town between the two stages of the research. The outcomes of the study show that the power hierarchy and the relations within it over the past 8 years have changed significantly, yet many of the essential characteristics of urban politics have been preserved and reproduced. The role of the town-forming enterprise in the political process decreased along with a decrease in the economic potential of the plant and the refusal of the enterprise owners to be actively involved in urban politics. After the town and district structures of the municipal government merger, serious tensions within the local elite disappeared, resulting in the formation of a new configuration of actors. Whereas earlier there were three approximately equal centers of power (leadership of the town, district, and town-forming enterprise), now there is no serious political competition in the community, while the local elite constitutes a single team. The new configuration of the top actors and the nature of the relationships between them do not allow explain them in terms of urban regime in its classical interpretation. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-2-111-127

Author Biographies

Алла Чирикова / Alla Chirikova, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Chief Researcher

Валерий Ледяев / Valeriy Ledyaev, National Research University “Higher School of Economics” (Moscow)

Professor

References

Борисова, Н. (2010) ‘Пермь: локальный режим в крупном российском городе’, Неприкосновенный запас, 2, сс. 92–102. [Boriso¬va, N. (2010) Perm: local regimes in the big Russian city [Perm: lokal’niy rezhim v krupnom rossiyskom gorode], Neprikosnovenniy zapas, 2, рр. 92–102. (In Russ.)].

Витковская, Т., Рябова, О. (2011) Моногорода Среднего Урала: локальные элиты и политические процессы. Екатеринбург. РИО УРО РАН. [Vitkovskaya, T., Rya-bova, O. (2011) Single-industry towns of the Middle Urals: local elites and political processes [Monogoroda Srednego Urala: lokal’nyye elity i politicheskiye protsessy]. Yekaterinburg. RIO URO RAS. (In Russ.)].

Гельман, В. (2010) ‘Власть, управление и локальные режимы в России’, Неприкосновенный запас, 2, cc. 53–62. [Gel’man, V. ‘Power, government and local regimes In Russia’ [Vlast’, upravliniye i lo-kal’niye rezhimi v Rossii], Neprikosno-venniy zapas, 2, pp. 53–62. (In Russ.)].

Красильников, Д. Г., Троицкая, Е. (2018) ‘Динамика межэлитных взаимоотношений на локальном уровне (на примере аграрного муниципального района Пермского края)’, Ars Administrandi, T. 10, 2, cc. 19–34. [Krasilschikov, G., Troitskaya, E. (2018) ‘Dynamics of inter-elite relations at the local level (the case of the agrarian municipal district of Perm Terri-tory)’ [Dinamika mezhelitnikh vzai-mootnosheniy na lokal’nom urovne (na primere agrarnogo munitsipal’nogo ray-ona Permskogo kraya)], Ars Administran-di, Vol. 10, 2, pp. 19–34. (In Russ.)].

Ледяев, В. (2001) Власть: концептуальный анализ. Москва: РОССПЭН. [Le-dyaev, V. (2001) Power: A conceptual analysis [Vlast: kontseptual’niy analiz]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)].

Ледяев, В. (2012) Социология власти. Теория и опыт эмпирического исследования власти в городских сообществах. Москва: ГУ-ВШЭ. [Ledyaev, V. (2012) Sociology of power: Theory and experience of empir-ical study of power in urban communities [Sotsiologiya vlasti: teoriya i opit em-piricheskogo issledovaniya vlasti v go-rodskikh soobschestvakh]. Moscow: GU-VSHE. (In Russ.)].

Малый, В., Гусев, В. (2014) ‘Влияние политического и экологического акторов на социальный механизм современного моногорода’, Вестник Томского университета. Сер. Философия. Социология. Политология, 25(1), сс. 56–66. [Maliy, V., Gusev, V. (2014) ‘Influence of politi-cal and ecological actors on the social mechanism of modern mono-industrial company town’ [Vliyaniye poli¬ticheskogo i ecologicheskogo aktorov na sotsial’niy mekhanism sovremennogo monogoroda], Vestnik Tomskogo universiteta. Ser. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Polito¬logiya, Vol. 25, 1, pp. 56–66. (In Russ.)].

Панов, П. (2008) ‘Локальная политика в разных измерениях’, Политическая наука, 3, cc. 9–31. [Panov, P. (2008) ‘Local poli-tics in different dimensions’ [Lokal’naya politika v raznikh izmereniyakh], Politi-cheskaya nauka, 3, pp. 9–31. (In Russ.)].

Панов, П. (2019) ‘Городские думы малых и средних городов Свердловской области: потенциал автономии в отношениях с главой города’, Вестник Пермского федерального исследовательского центра, 3, cc. 95–107. [Panov, P. (2019) ‘Town councils of small and medium-sized towns of the Sverdlovsk region: the potential of autonomy in relations with the head of the town’ [Gorodskiye dumi malikh i srednikh gorodov Sverdlovskoy oblasti: potential avtonomii v otnosheni-yakh s glavoy goroda], Vestnik Perm¬skogo federal’nogo issledovatel’skogo tsentra, 3, pp. 95–107. (In Russ.)].

Пустовойт, Ю. (2014) ‘Городские политические режимы: координация внутриэлитного взаимодействия в крупных индустриальных городах’, Государственное управление. Электронный вестник, 46, 4, cc. 85–106. [Pustovoit, Yu. (2014) ‘Urban political regimes: coordination of intra-elite interaction in large industrial cities’ [Gorodskiye politicheskiye regimi: koordinatsiya vnutrielitmogo vzaimodei-stviya v krupnikh industrial’nikh go-rodakh], Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronniy vestnik, 46, 4, pp. 85–106. (In Russ.)].

Пустовойт, Ю. (2019 (a)) ‘Как создается режим: властные коалиции в сибирских городах’, Полис, 4, cc. 104–118. [Pus-tovoit, Yu. (2019 (a)) ‘How the regime is formed: power coalitions in siberian towns’ [Kak sozdaetsia rezhim: vlastniye koalitsii v sibirskikh gorodakh], Polis, 4, pp. 104–118. (In Russ.)].

Пустовойт, Ю. (2019 (б)) ‘«Контрэлита»: местная власть и ее оппоненты в сибирском мегаполисе’, Власть и элиты, 6, cc. 48–70. [Pustovoit, Yu. (2019 (b)) ‘“Contr-elite”: local authorities and its opponents in Siberian towns’ [“Kontrelita”: mestnaya vlast’ i yeye opponenti v sibirskom megapoilise], Vlast’ i eliti, 6, pp. 48–70. (In Russ.)].

Сельцер, Д. (2017) ‘Рекрутирование локальной административной элиты России: исходные данные для построения систем-но-динамической модели’, Pro Nunc, 2 (18), cc. 27–32. [Seltser, D. (2017) ‘Re-cruiting of the local administrative elite of Russia: initial data for building a sys-tem-dynamic model’ [Rekrutirovaniye lokal’noy administrativnoy eliti Rossii: iskhodniye danniye dlia postroeniya sis-temno-dinamicheskoy modeli], Pro Nunc, 2 (18), pp. 27–32. (In Russ.)].

Подвинцев, О. (2007) Такая разная Россия. Политические процессы и местные сообщества в малых городах. Пермь: Издательский дом «Типография купца Тара-сова». [Podvintsev, O. (2007) Such a dif-ferent Russia. Political processes and lo-cal communities in small towns [Takaya raznaya Rossiya. Politicheskiye protsessi i mestniye soobschestva v malikh go-rodakh]. Perm: Izdatel’skiy dom “Tipo-grafia kuptsa Tarasova”. (In Russ.)].

Тев, Д. (2012) ‘Моногорода: бассейн рекрутирования глав администраций и специфика структуры власти’, Управленческое консультирование, 3, cc. 74–83. [Tev, D. (2012) ‘Monoindustrial compa-ny towns: the recruitment pool for the heads of administrations and the specifics of the power structure’ [Monogoroda: bassein rekrutirovaniya glav admin-istratsiy i spetsifika structuri vlasti], Up-ravlencheskoye konsultirovaniye, 3, pp. 74–83. (In Russ.)].

Тыканова, Е., Хохлова, А. (2015) ‘Городской политический режим в Санкт-Петербурге: роль реальных и воображаемых «машин роста» в борьбе за городское пространство’, Журнал исследований социальной политики, 13 (2), cc. 241–256. [Tikhanova, E., Khokhlova, A. (2015) ‘Urban political regime in St. Pe-tersburg: the role of real and imaginary “growth machines” in the struggle for urban space’ [Gorodskoy politicheskiy rezhim v Sankt-Peterburge: rol’ real’nikh i voobrazhaemikh “mashin rosta” v bor’be za gorodskoye prostranstvo], Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki, 13 (2), pp. 241–256. (In Russ.)].

Филиппова, Е., Рябова, О. (2018) ‘Градообразующие предприятия в политическом пространстве промышленных городов Урала: вариативность включенности’, Вестник Пермского федерального исследовательского центра, 4, cc. 81–86. [Filippova, E., Riabova, O. (2018) ‘Town-forming enterprises in the political space of industrial cities of the Urals: variability of inclusion’ [Gradoobrazu’uschiye pred-priyatiya v politicheskom prostranstve promishlennikh gorodov Urala: vari-ativnost’ vkluchennosti], Vestnik Perm-skogo federal’nogo issledovatel’skogo tsentra, 4, pp. 81–86. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А. (2005) ‘Социальная политика в монопрофильном городе: корпорация и власть’, в: Социальная политика бизнеса в российских регионах. Москва: ИНИОН РАН. [Chirikova, A. (2005) So-cial policy in a mono-industrial company town: corporation and power [Sotsi-al’naya politika v monoprofil’nom goro-de: korporatsiya i vlast’], in: Sotsial’naya politika biznesa v rossiyskikh regionakh. Moscow: INION RAN. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А., Ледяев, В., Сельцер, Д. (2014) ‘Власть в малом российском городе: конфигурация и взаимодействие основных акторов’, Полис, 2, cc. 88–105. [Chirikova, A., Ledyaev, V., Seltser, D. (2014) ‘Power in a small Russian town: configuration and interaction of the main actors’ [Vlast’ v malom rossiyskom go-rode: konfiguratsdiya i vzaimodeystviye osnovnikh aktorov], Polis, 2, pp. 88–105. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А. Е., Ледяев, В. Г. (2015) ‘Власть в малых российских городах: модели взаимодействия исполнительной и представительной власти’, Мир России: Социология, этнология, 3, cc. 6–32. [Chirikova, A., Ledyaev, V. (2015) ‘Pow-er in small Russian towns: models of in-teraction between executive and repre-sentative branches of local government’ [Vlast’ v malikh rossiyskikh gorodakh: modeli vzaimodeistviya ispolnitel’noy i predstavitel’noy vlasti], Mir Rossii: Sotsiologiya, etnologiya, 3, pp. 6–32. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А. Е., Ледяев, В. Г. (2016) ‘Власть в моногороде’ в: Власть и элиты / гл. ред. А. Дука. Т. 3. Санкт-Петербург: Интерсоцис, сс. 206–234. [Chirikova, A., Ledyaev, V. (2016) ‘Power in a mono-industrial company town’ [Vlast’ v mono¬gorode] in: Vlast’ i eliti / ed. by A. Duka. Vol. 3. Sankt-Peterburg: Inter-sotsis, pp. 206–234. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А., Ледяев, В. (2017) Власть в малом российском городе. Москва: НИУ ВШЭ. [Chirikova, A., Ledyaev, V. (2017) Power in the small Russian town [Vlast’ v malom rossiyskom gorode]. Moscow: NIU VSHE. (In Russ.)].

Шкель, С. (2017) ‘Рекрутирование локальных элит в условиях субнационального авторитаризма: опыт Республики Башкортостан’, Политическая наука, 4, сс. 137–160. [Shkel’, S. (2017) ‘Recruit-ing local elites in the context of subna-tional authoritarianism: the experience of the Republic of Bashkortostan’ [Rekruti-rovaniye lokal’nikh elit v usloviyakh subnatsional’nogo avtoritarisma: opit respubliki Bashkortostan], Politichaskaya nauka, 4, рр. 137–160. (In Russ.)].

Шкель, С. (2018) ‘Почему депутаты не бунтуют: политический потенциал ассамблей в малых городах республики Башкортостан’, Ars Administrandi, т. 10, 4, сс. 667–686. [Shkel’, S. (2018) ‘Why deputies do not rebel: political potential of assemblies in small town in the Re-public of Bashkortostan’ [Pochemu depu-tati ne buntuyut: politicheskiy potentsial assam¬bley v malikh gorodakh respubliki Bashkortostan], Ars Administrandi. Vol. 10, 4, рр. 667–686. (In Russ.)].

Harding, A. (2009) ‘The history of community power’, in: Theories of Urban Politics. Second edition / ed. by Jonathan S. Da-vies and David L. Imbroscio. London: Sage. Pp. 27–39.

Ledyaev, V., Chirikova, A. (2019) ‘Governors and Local Elites In Russia: Patterns of In-teraction’, European Politics and Society, Vol. 20, 3, pp. 315–332.

Ledyaev, V., Chirikova, A. (2017) ‘Power in the local Russian Communities: Patterns of Interaction Between Legislative and

Executive Branches of Local Govern-ment’, Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 53, 6, pp. 990–1024.

Peterson, P. (1981) City Limits. Chicago and London. The University of Chicago Press.

Stone, C. N. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: Universi-ty Press of Kansas.

Published

2020-07-17

How to Cite

Alla Chirikova А. Ч. /, & Valeriy Ledyaev В. Л. /. (2020). AUTHORITIES IN A MONO-INDUSTRIAL TOWN: TRAJECTORIES OF CHANGE. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 14(2), 111–127. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/3345