COLLECTIVE ACTION: TRANSFORMATION OF ONLINE RESOURCE INTO OFFLINE ACTIVITY (A CASE STUDY OF POLITICAL PROTEST CAMPAIGNS UNDER A. NAVALNY’S LEADERSHIP)

Authors

Keywords:

collective action, protest, Internet, social media, civic activism, e-participation, A. Navalny

Abstract

The article considers the development of the Internet and social media as factors that create new opportunities for citizens’ collective action and discovers that they provide a wide range of tools for organizing and implementing collective action – expression, community building, communication, voting, finding solutions to problems, and fundraising, and creating a critical mass of disaffected people. The potential of the Internet and social media are examined in detail through the analysis of collective actions organized by A. Navalny in 2010-2017. This study starts with an analysis of A. Navalny’s independent activity in the framework of campaigns for the rights of minority shareholders of large corporations and then – against corruption and non-fulfillment of official duties (RosPil, RosYama, etc). One of the first significant results of this activity was his participation in the Moscow mayoral election, resulted in him ranking second (27.24 % of the votes), which helped in the transformation of his online influence into an offline one. In the following years, he developed a lot of activities in public projects criticizing power, creating films and his YouTube channel. The study highlights specific periods of A. Navalny’s career path with the most successful projects being analyzed. Quantitative analysis methods were applied during the study to confirm this assessment.The findings suggest that A. Navalny has successfully formed a social and political capital through online activity and ICT, which he managed to convert into fame and an ability to organize mass offline political actions throughout the country. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-2-98-110

Author Biographies

Alexander Sokolov / Александр Соколов, Demidov Yaroslavl State University

Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Socio-Political Theories

Asiyat Kurbanova / Асият Курбанова, Saint Petersburg State University

undergraduate

References

Гусейнов, А. Ш. (2012) ‘Феномен протестного поведения’, Человек. Сообщество. Управление, 2. сс. 82–94. [Guseynov, A. Sh. (2012) ‘The phenomenon of pro-test behavior’ [Fenomen protestnogo povedeniya], Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye, 2. pp. 82–94. (In Russ.)].

Патрушев, С. В. (2009) ‘Гражданская активность: институциональный подход (перспективы исследования)’, Полис, 6, сс. 24–32. [Patrushev, S. V. (2009) Civic engagement: an institutional approach (research perspectives) [Grazhdanskaya aktivnost’: institutsional’nyy podkhod (perspektivy issledovaniya)], Polis, 6, pp. 24–32. (In Russ.)].

Петухов, В. В., Бараш, Р. Э., Седова, Н. Н., Петухов, Р. В. (2014) ‘Гражданский активизм в России: мотивация, ценности и формы участия’, Власть, 9 (22), сс. 11–19. [Petukhov, V., Barash, R., Sedova, N., Petukhov, R. (2014) ‘Civil activism in Russia: motivation, values and forms of participation’ [Grazhdanskiy aktivizm v Rossii: motivatsiya, tsennosti i formy uchastiyа], Power, 9 (22). pp. 11–19. (In Russ.)].

Фролов, А. А., Соколов, А. В. (2014). ‘Условия гражданской активности в интернете’, Социальный компьютинг: основы, технологии развития, социально-гуманитарные эффекты (ISC-14). Москва, сс. 290–294. [Frolov, A., Sokolov, A. (2014) ‘Conditions of civil activity on the Internet’ [Usloviya grazhdanskoy ak-tivnosti v internete], Social computing: the basics, development technologies, so-cial and humanitarian effects. Moscow, pр. 290–294. (In Russ.)].

Яницкий, О. Н. (2013) Социальные движения: теория, практика, перспектива. Москва: Новый хронограф, 360 с. [Yantsky, O. (2013) Social movements: theory, prac-tice, perspective [Sotsial’nyye dvi¬zheniya: teoriya, praktika, perspektiva]. Moscow: Novyy khronograf, 360 р. (In Russ.)].

Ansell, C. (2008) Network Institutionalism. In: Binder, S. A., Rhodes, R. A. W., Rock-man, B. A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford univ. press. 2008, pp. 75–89.

Berger, C. R. (2009) Interpersonal communica-tion. In: Stacks, D. W., Salwen, M. B. (eds.) An integrated approach to commu-nication theory and research. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 260–279.

Brady, H., Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. (1995) Beyond Ses: A Resource Model of Politi-cal Participation. American Political Sci-ence Review, 89 (2), pр. 271–294.

Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., Gotlieb, M. R. (2009) Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19, pр. 66–88.

Diani, M. (1995) Green Networks: A Structural Analysis of the Italian Environmental Movement. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Uni-versity Press.

Friedman, D., McAdam, D. (1992) Collective Identity and Activism. Networks, Choic-es and the Life of a Social Movement. In: Aldo D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller. (eds.) Frontiers in Social Move-ment Theory. New Haven: Yale Universi-ty Press. pp. 156–172.

Gray-Hawkins, M. (2018) Collective movements, digital activism, and protest events: The effectiveness of social media concerning the organization of large-scale political participation. Geopolitics, History and In-ternational Relations, 10 (2). p. 64–69.

Langman, L. (2005) From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of In-ternetworked Social Movements. Socio-logical Theory, 23(1). p. 42–74.

McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development o/black insurgency: 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McAdam, D. (2003). Social Movements and Net-works: Relational Approaches to Collec-tive Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D, Zald, M. N. (1996) Comparative Perspectives and Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mo-bilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing. Cambridge University Press, New York.

McCurdy, P. (2012) Social Movements, Protest and Mainstream Media. Sociology Compass Blackwell Publishing, 6 (3), pp. 244–255.

Medina, L. F. (2007) A Unified Theory of Collec-tive Action and Social Change, Analytical Perspectives on Politics. Ann Arbor: Uni-versity of Michigan Press.

Tilly, C. (1995). Popular contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tufekci, Z. (2014) The Medium and the Move-ment: Digital Tools, Social Movement Politics, and the End of the Free Rider Problem. Policy & Internet, 6 (2), pp. 202–208.

Valenzuela, S. (2013) Unpacking the Use of So-cial Media for Protest Behavior: The Roles of Information, Opinion Expres-sion, and Activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7). pp. 920–942.

van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B. (2010) Individuals in Movements: A Social Psy-chology of Contention. In: Klandermans, B., Roggeband, C. (eds.) Handbook of So-cial Movements across Disciplines. Springer, New York. pp. 157–205.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-17

How to Cite

Александр Соколов A. S. /, & Асият Курбанова A. K. /. (2020). COLLECTIVE ACTION: TRANSFORMATION OF ONLINE RESOURCE INTO OFFLINE ACTIVITY (A CASE STUDY OF POLITICAL PROTEST CAMPAIGNS UNDER A. NAVALNY’S LEADERSHIP). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 14(2), 98–110. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/3344