PARTICIPATIVE TREND IN PUBLIC POLICY: IMPLEMENTATION FACTORS

Authors

Keywords:

public policy, participation constituents of public policy, political participation, civil practices, political competence, human potential, civil society

Abstract

The article reviews the formation factors and development process of a participative trend in public policy. It was proved based on the analysis of the results of cross-national, national, and regional socio-political research that along with the objective determinants, which specify the quality of political management, the subjective actor-oriented criteria are becoming more important, thus actualizing the issues of involving citizens in the political process and providing participative constituents of the public policy. However, there might be such consequences of participatory policy as an increase in conflicts of socio-political relations and the domination of a centrifugal way of political participation space development. These risks are characteristic of many European states, including Russia, where the situation is under the influence of the incomplete and inconsistent process of establishment of civil society. The intensification of citizens’ self-organization process, which is based on an increase of their political competence, is offered as one of the ways of public policy optimization. It will enable the interrelation of micro- and macro levels of functioning of a socio-political system, the existence and effectiveness of which are decisively determined by the development of a civil institutional environment. To solve this issue a basic model of political competence development is offered. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-2-40-52

Author Biography

Анастасия Лаврикова / Anastasiya Lavrikova, Tula State University

Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology and Political Science

References

Белл, Д. (2004) Грядущее постиндустриальное общество. Опыт социального прогнозирования. Москва: Academia. [Bell, D. (2004) The upcoming post-industrial soci-ety. Experience of social forecasting [Grjadushhee postindustrial’noe obshhes-tvo. Opyt social’nogo prognozirovanija]. Moscow: Academia (In Russ.)].

Бодрийяр, Ж. (2000a) Символический обмен и смерть. Москва: Добросвет. [Baudri-llard, J (2000a) Symbolic exchange and death [Simvolicheskij obmen i smert’]. Moscow: “Dobrosvet” (In Russ.)].

Бодрийяр, Ж. (2000b) В тени молчаливого большинства, или Конец социального. Екатеринбург [электронное издание]. URL: http://www.e-reading.club/bookrea-der.php/73140/Bodriiiyar_V_teni_molchalivogo_bol %27shinstva %2C_ili_Konec_social %27nogo.html (дата обращения: 15.09.2016). [Baudrillard, J (2000b) In the shadow of the silent majority, or the end of the social [V teni molchalivogo bol’shinstva, ili Konec social’nogo]. Ye-katerinburg [online]. Avai¬lable at: http://www.e-reading.club/book-reader.php/73140/Bodriiiyar_-_V_teni_

molchalivogo_bol %27shinstva %2C_ili_

Konec_social %27nogo.html (Accessed: 15 September 2016) (In Russ.)].

Головин, Ю. А., Барский, Я. В. (2018) ‘Гражданская активность в Ярославской области: специфика и закономерности’, Социальные и гуманитарные знания, 4 (3), сс. 141–148. [Golovin, Yu. A., Bar-sky, Ya. V. (2018) ‘Civic activism in the Yaroslavl region: specificity and patterns’ [Grazhdanskaja aktivnost’ v Jaroslavskoj oblasti: specifika i zakonomernosti], So-cial’nye i gumanitarnye znanija, 4 (3), pр. 141–148 (In Russ.)].

Даль, Р. А. (1994) ‘Полиархия, плюрализм и пространство’, Вопросы философии, 3, сс. 37–49. URL: http://kant.narod.ru/

dahl.htm (дата обращения: 30.05.2017) [Dahl, R. (1994) ‘Polyarchy, pluralism and space’ [Poliarhija, pljuralizm i pros-tran¬stvo], Voprosy filosofii, 3, pр. 37–49 [online]. Available at: http://kant.narod.

ru/dahl.htm (Accessed: 30 May 2017). (In Russ.)].

Доклад о состоянии гражданского общества в Российской Федерации за 2018 г. (2018). Москва: Общественная палата Российской Федерации [Report on the status of civil society in the Russian Fed-eration for 2018 (2018) [Doklad o sos-tojanii grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Ros-sijskoj Federacii za 2018 god]. Moscow: Public Chamber of the Russian Federa-tion. (In Russ.)].

Доклад о состоянии гражданского общества в Тульской области за 2018 г. (2018). Ту-ла [Report on the state of civil society in the Tula region for 2018 (2018) [Doklad o sostojanii grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Tul’skoj oblasti za 2018 g.]. Tula. (In Russ.)].

Кабанов, Ю. А. (2018) ‘Что скрывается за «фа-садом»? Исследовательская программа электронного участия в недемократических странах’, Вестник Пермского университета, Политология, 3, сс. 50–66 [Kabanov, Yu. A. (2018) ‘What is hid¬den behind the “facade”? E-Participation Re-search Program in Non-Democratic Countries’ [CHto skryvaetsya za «fasa-dom»? Issledovatel’skaya programma el-ektronnogo uchastiya v nedemokratich-eskih stranah], Vestnik Permskogo uni-versiteta, Politologiya, 3, рр. 50–60. (In Russ.)].

Масуда, Е. (1993) ‘Компьютопия’, Философская и социологическая мысль, 6, сс. 36–47 [Masuda, Ye. (1993) ‘Komp’yutopiya’ [Komp’jutopija], Filosofskaja i sociolo¬gicheskaja mysl’, 6, pр. 36–47. (In Russ.)].

Пай, Л. (2003) ‘Незападный политический процесс’, Политическая наука, 2, сс. 66–86 [Pai, L. (2003) ‘Non-Western Political Process’ [Nezapadnyj politicheskij pro-cess], Politicheskaja nauka, 2, pр. 66–86. (In Russ.)].

Патрушев, С. В. (2009) ‘Гражданская активность: институциональный подход (перспективы исследования)’, Полис, 6, сс. 24–32 [Patrushev, S. V. (2009) ‘Civic Engagement: An Institutional Approach (Research Perspectives)’ [Grazhdanskaja aktivnost’: institucional’nyj podhod (per-spektivy issledovanija)], Polis, 6, pр. 24–32. (In Russ.)].

Сморгунов, Л. В. (2017) ‘Государство, сотрудничество и инклюзивный экономический рост’, Власть, 11, сс. 22–30 [Smor¬gunov, L. V. (2017) ‘State, cooperation and inclusive economic growth’ [Gosu¬darstvo, sotrudnichestvo i inkljuzivnyj jekonomicheskij rost], Vlast’, 11, pр. 22–30. (In Russ.)].

Сморгунов, Л. В. (ред.) (2018) Публичная политика: Институты, цифровизация, развитие: коллективная монография. Москва: Аспект-Пресс [Smorgunov, L. V. (eds.) Public policy: Institutions, digitalization, development: collective monograph [Publichnaja politika: Insti-tuty, cifrovizacija, razvitie: kollektivnaja monografija]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)].

Тоффлер, Э. (2002) Третья волна. Москва: Изд-во «АСТ» [Toffler, E. (2002) The Third Wave [Tret’ja volna]. Moscow: AST Publishing House. (In Russ.)].

Фельдман, П. Я. (2016) ‘Политика согласования интересов в Италии и России: компаративный анализ’, Вестник БИСТ, 3 (32), сс.18–24 [Feldman, P. Ya. (2016) ‘Policy on the Coordination of Interests in Italy and Russia: Comparative Analy-sis’ [‘Politika soglasovanija interesov v Italii i Rossii: komparativnyj analiz’], Vestnik BIST, 3 (32), pр.18–24. (In Russ.)].

Фуко, М. (1996) Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Мос-ква [Foucault, M. (1996) The Will to Truth: Beyond Knowledge, Power, and Sexuality [Volja k istine: po tu storonu znanija, vlasti i seksual’nosti]. Moscow. (In Russ.)].

Хантингтон, С. (2004) Политический порядок в меняющихся обществах. Москва: Прогресс-Традиция [Huntington, S. (2004) The Political Order in Changing Societies [Politicheskij porjadok v menjajushhihsja obshhestvah] Moscow: Progress Tradi-tion. (In Russ.)].

Шумпетер, Й. (1995) Капитализм, социализм и демократия. Москва: Экономика [Schumpeter, J. (1995) Capitalism, So-cialism, and Democracy [Kapitalizm, so-cializm i demokratija]. Moscow: Econo-mics. (In Russ.)].

Almond, G., Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer-sity Press.

Barnes, M., Newman, J., Sullivan, H. (2004) ‘Power, Participation and Political Re-newal: Theoretical Perspective on Public Participation under New Labour in Brit-ain’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 11 (2), рp. 267–279.

Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., McPhee, W. N. (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion For-mation in a Presidential Election. Chica-go: University of Chicago Press. XIV.

Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., Stohl, C. (2005) ‘Re-conceptualizing Соllective Action in the Contemporary Media Environment’, Communication Theory, 4, рp. 378–384.

Huntington, S. P. (1966) ‘The Political Moderni-zation of Traditional Monarchies’, Daed-alus, 95, рp. 763–768.

Nayyar, D. (2006) ‘India’s Unfinished Journey Transforming Growth into Develop-ment’, Modern Asian Studies, 40 (3), рp. 797–832.

Parsons, T. (1957) ‘The Distribution of Power in American Society’, World Politics, 10, pр. 123–143.

Parsons, T. (1966) ‘The Concept of Society: The Components and Their Interrela-tions’ in: Parsons T. Societies: Evolu-tionary and Comparatives. Englewood Cliffs, pр. 5–29.

Published

2020-07-17

How to Cite

Anastasiya Lavrikova А. Л. /. (2020). PARTICIPATIVE TREND IN PUBLIC POLICY: IMPLEMENTATION FACTORS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 14(2), 40–52. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/3339