FREQUENCY OF SUFFERING: WHAT TYPE OF POLITICAL REGIME IS MORE PRONE TO TERRORISM

Authors

Keywords:

terrorism, domestic terrorism, international terrorism, frequency of terrorist attacks, political regime, democracy, authoritarianism

Abstract

Despite the political importance of the topic there is no common view what terrorism is. Nevertheless researchers ask why some countries are more terrorized than the others? Some argue that democracy is less prone to terrorism because it provides a huge variety of peaceful ways to implement one’s political interest while the others insist that dictatorships suffer from terrorist attacks less frequently thanks to the opportunity to violate citizens’ rights. The study shows that both points of view can be proved and refuted depending on the way we measure the political regime. Regression model based on the “Freedom House” data confirms that democracies suffer from terrorism less often, while the model based on the “Polity IV” data refutes it. To clarify these controversial results we compare the counterterrorist strategies of France and Russia. The comparison shows that democracy is able to reduce domestic terrorism, but it still suffers from international one. At the same time an authoritarian regime suffers generally from domestic attacks and it is also unable to eliminate the threat of international terrorism.  DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2018-4-140-152

Author Biography

Iulia Mekhonoshina / Юлия Мехоношина, Perm State University

Мaster in International relations, assistant lecture of political science department

References

Абдурахманов, С. (2009). ‘Сущность терроризма: теоретико-методологический анализ’, Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура, сс. 68–73. [Abdurahmanov, S. (2009). ‘The nature of terrorism: theoretical and methodological analysis’ [Sushhnost’ terrorizma: teoretikometodologicheskij analiz], Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura, pр. 68–73. (In Russ.)].

Бартенев, В. (2015). ‘Связка “Безопасность-Развитие” в Современных Западных Исследованиях. От Деконструкции к Контекстуализации’, Международные процессы, сс. 78–97. [Bartenev, V. (2015). ‘“Security – Development Nexus” in Western Bibliography [Svjazka «Bezopasnost’-Razvitie» v Sovremennyh Zapadnyh Issledovanijah. Ot Dekonstrukcii k Kontekstualizacii], Mezhdunarodnye processy, pр. 78– 79. (In Russ.)].

Верникке, Й. (2015). ‘Десять дней в Исламском государстве: Если ИГ – это ислам, то Ку-клукс-клан – христианство’. ИноСМИ. [Vernikke, J. (2015). ‘Ten days in Islamic State: If the IS is an islam, then the Ku Klux Klan is a christianity’ [Desjat’ dnej v Islamskom gosudarstve: Esli IG – jeto islam, to Ku-kluks-klan – hristianstvo]. InoSMI (In Russ.)].

Дикаев, С. (2006). Террор, терроризм и преступления террористического характера (криминологическое и уголовно-правовое исследование). Санкт-Петербург: Изд-во Р. Асланова «Юридический центр Пресс». [Dikaev, S. (2006). Terror, terrorism and crimes of terrorist na

ture (criminological and criminal law research) [Terror, terrorizm i prestuplenija terroristicheskogo haraktera (kriminologicheskoe i ugolovno-pravovoe issledovanie)]. Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo R. Aslanova «Juridicheskij centr Press». (In Russ.)].

Казанцев, А. А. (2016). ‘Рабочая тетрадь РСМД «Проблема вербовки и возврата боевиков-террористов: опыт Европы и перспективы России»’. URL: http://russiancouncil.ru/ common/upload/WP-Terrorists-27Rus.pdf (Дата обращения: 7 сентября 2016) [Kazancev, A. A. (2016). RCIA Workbook “The problem of recruitment and return of terrorist fighters: European experience and Russia’s prospects” [Rabochaja tetrad’ RSMD “Problema verbovki i vozvrata boevikov-terroristov: opyt Evropy i perspektivy Rossii”]. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/common/upload/WP-Terrorists-27-Rus. pdf (Accessed: 7 September 2016) (In Russ.)].

Степанов, Е. (2000). ‘Введение: терроризм как предмет конфликтологической экспертизы’ в Степанов, Е. (ред.) Современный терроризм: состояние и перспективы. Москва: Эдиториал УРСС, сс. 5–9. [Stepanov, E. (2000). ‘Introduction: terrorism as a subject of conflictological expertise’ [Vvedenie: terrorizm kak predmet konfliktologicheskoj jekspertizy] in Stepanov, E (red.)‘Morden terrorism: state and prospects’ [Sovremennyj terrorizm: sostojanie i perspektivy]. Moskva: Jeditorial URSS, pp. 5–9. (In Russ.)].

Устинов, В. (2002). Международныйопыт борьбы с терроризмом: стандарты и практика. Москва: Изд-во «Юрлитинформ». [Ustinov, V. (2002). International expirence of fighting terrorism: standarts and practice [Mezhdunarodnyj opyt bor’by s terrorizmom: standarty i praktika]. Moskva: Izd-vo «Jurlitinform» (In Russ.)].

Федорченко, А. В. (2015). ‘Исламское государство: истоки, современное состояние, перспективы’. Вестник МГИМО Университета, сс. 221– 225. [Fedorchenko, A. V. (2015). ‘Islamic state: origins, current status and prospects’ [Islamskoe gosudarstvo: istoki, sovremennoe sostojanie, perspektivy]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta, pр. 221–225. (In Russ.)].

Abadie, A. (2006). ‘Poverty, political freedom, and the roots of terrorism’, American Economic Review, рр. 50– 56.

Alexader, Y. (1979). Terrorism: Theory and Practice. Boulder: Westview Press, Inc.

Aubrey, S. M. (2004). The New Dimension of International Terrorism. Zurich: Vdf Hochschulverlag.

Blomberg, S. B., & Hess, G. D. (2008). ‘The Lexus and the olive branch: globalization, democratization and terrorism’. In P. Keefer & N. Loayza (Eds.), Terrorism, economic development, and political openness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 116–147.

Drakos, K., & Gofas, A. (2006). ‘In search of the average transnational terrorist attack venue’, Defence and Peace Economics, рр. 73–93.

Eubank, W., & Weinberg, L. (2001). ‘Terrorism and democracy: Perpetrators and victims’, Terrorism and Political Violence, рр. 155–164.

Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (1999). ‘Transnational terrorism in the post–cold war era’, International Studies Quarterly, рр. 145–167.

Galtung, J. (1969). ‘Violence, Peace, and Peace Research’, Journal of Peace Research, рр. 167–191.

Gassebner, M., & Luechinger, S. (2011). ‘Lock, stock, and barrel: a comprehensive assessment of the determinants of terror’, Public Choice, рр. 235–261.

Gouvernement Français. (2016). ‘Plan d’action contre la radicalisation et le terrorisme’. Sur: http://www. gouvernement.fr/sites/default/files/ liseuse/7050/master/projet/Plan-daction-contre-la-radicalisation-et-leterrorisme.pdf (Consulté le octobre 4, 2016).

Guelke, A. (1998). The Age of Terrorism and the International Political System. London: I. B. Tauris Publishers.

Hoffman, B. (1995). ‘‘Holy Terror’: The Implications of Terrorism Motivated by a Religious Imperative’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, рр. 271–284.

Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Laqueur, W. (1999). The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. London: Oxford University Press.

Lesser, I. O., Hoffman, B., Arquilla, J., Ronfeldt, D. F., Zanini, M., & Jenkins, B. M. (1999). Countering the New Terrorism. Santa Monica: RAND.

Li, Q. (2005). ‘Does Democracy Promote or Reduce Transnational Terrorist Incidents?’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, рр. 278–297.

Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2001). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

Morgan, M. J. (2004). ‘The Origin of the New Terrorism’, Parameters, рр. 30–31.

National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. (2016). ‘Global Terrorism Database’. Global Terrorism Database.

Pelletier, É. (2016). Terrorisme: «J’ai côtoyé les Soldats d’Allah». Le Parisien.

Piazza, J. A. (2006). ‘Rooted in poverty? Terrorism, poor economic development, and social cleavages’, Terrorism and Political Violence, рр. 159– 177.

Piazza, J. A. (2008). ‘Do Democracy and

Free Markets Protect Us From Terrorism?’, International Politics, рр. 72–91.

Simon, S., & Benjamin, D. (2000). ‘America and the New Terrorism’, Survival, рр. 59–75.

Tschirgi, N., Lund, M., & Manchini, F. (2010). Security and development: searching for critical connections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

UN General Assembly. (17 February 1995). Resolution 49/60. Measures to eliminate international terrorism. Available at: https://undocs.org/ en/A/RES/49/60 (Accessed: 10 September 2018).

Wilkinson, P. (2006). Terrorism Versus Democracy. The Liberal State Response. London: Taylor & Francis Group.

Downloads

How to Cite

Юлия Мехоношина I. M. /. (2019). FREQUENCY OF SUFFERING: WHAT TYPE OF POLITICAL REGIME IS MORE PRONE TO TERRORISM. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 12(4), 140–152. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/3178