PUBLIC ASSESSMENT OF THE INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN A METROPOLIS: CHALLENGES AND LESSONS OF THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM

Authors

Keywords:

innovation infrastructure, digitalization, public policy, metropolis, administrative reform, public opinion, cluster

Abstract

The article aims to analyze the mechanisms of improving modern regional innovation policy. It is based on the formation and functioning of innovative industrial clusters, whose main purpose is to ensure close cooperation between industrial enterprises and research centers. This strategy contributes to the development of regions and attracting investment, and is of particular importance for the evolution of Russian megacities. The academic novelty of the study is in viewing regional innovation policy as a significant resource for public policy management. In the context of the current stage of the administrative reform and its requirements (publicity of in assessing the activities of government bodies, project management, innovative development, etc.), public awareness of the activities of innovation infrastructure objects increases the level of public trust in both innovative projects and the authorities that initiate them. At the same time, poor marketing of innovations leads to significant communicational problems. Saint Petersburg was among the first cities to develop and popularize innovative infrastructure and innovative products. To expose the process of forming public opinion, the authors conducted a SWOT analysis and a study of the innovation infrastructure of the metropolis. It is concluded that competent positioning and promotion of regional innovation structure objects on the Internet, in social media is a significant factor in increasing the efficiency of metropolis management through building long-term partnerships with citizens and business structures.DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-1-88-96

Author Biographies

Анна Волкова / Anna Volkova, Saint Petersburg State University

associate Professor

Оксана Борисова / Oksana Borisova, GBU "House of Youth of St. Petersburg" under the Committee on Youth Policy and Cooperation with Public Organizations of the Government of St. Petersburg

specialist of information and analytical department

References

Маркова, В. Д. (2009) ‘Особенности маркетинга инноваций’, Проблемы современной" экономики, 4 (32). [Markova, V. D. (2009) ‘Specificities of marketing of innovations’ [Osobennosti marketinga innovatsii], Prob-lems of Modern Economics, 4 (32). (In Russ.)].

Новиков, А. Г. (2017) ‘Зарубежный опыт инновационной инфраструктуры региона’ [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/zarubezhnyy-opyt-innovatsionnoy-infrastruktury-regiona (дата обращения: 21.06.2019) [Novikov, A. G. (2017) ‘Foreign experience of regional innovative infrastructure’ [Zarubezhnyi opyt innovatsionnoi infrastruktury regiona] [online]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/zarubezhnyy-opyt-innovatsionnoy-infrastruktury-regiona (Accessed: 21 June 2019). (In Russ.)].

Организация инновационной деятельности в университетах США. Сборник информационно-аналитических материалов (2011). Н. Новгород: Изд-во ННГУ. [Organization of innovation at US universities. Collection of information analysis materials (2011) [Organizatsiya innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti v universitetakh SShA. Sbornik infor-matsionno-analiticheskikh materialov]. Nizhny Novgorod: Lobachevsky State Uni-versity of Nizhny Novgorod Publ. (In Russ.)].

Стыцюк, Р. Ю. (2015) ‘Маркетинговый̆ подход к управлению продвижением инноваций’, Экономика. Налоги. Право, 4, cc. 44–49. [Stytsyuk, R. Yu. (2015) ‘Marketing Ap-proach to the Innovation Promotion Man-agement’ [Marketingovyi podkhod k uprav-leniyu prodvizheniem innovatsii], Econom-ics, Taxes & Law, 4, pp. 44–49. (In Russ.)].

Тарабаева, В. Б. (2007) Инновационное развитие вузов: проблемы управления конфликтами. Белгород: Изд-во БелГУ. [Tarabaeva, V. B. (2007) Innovative development of higher ed-ucation institutions: problems of conflict management [Innovatsionnoe razvitie vuzov: problemy upravleniya konfliktami]. Belgo-rod: Belgorod State University Publ. (In Russ.)].

Фияксель, Э. А. (2009) ‘Национальный исследовательский университет как ядро регионального инновационного кластера’, Ин-новации, 12, cc. 85‒88. [Fiyaksel', E. A. (2009) ‘National Research University as the core of regional innovation cluster’ [Natsional'nyi issledovatel'skii universitet kak yadro regional'nogo innovatsionnogo klastera], Innovations, 12, pp. 85–88. (In Russ.)].

Evans, G., Durant, J. (1995) ‘The relationship be-tween knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain’, Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), pp. 57–74.

Kingdon, J. W. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman.

Korpi, W. (1989) ‘Power, Politics, and State Auton-omy in the Development of Social Citizen-ship’, American Sociological Science Review, 54, pp. 309‒329.

Stimson, J. A. (2004) How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weldon, S., Laycock, D. (2009) ‘Public opinion and biotechnological innovation’, Policy and So-ciety, 4(28), pp. 315–317.

Published

2020-04-11

How to Cite

Anna Volkova А. В. /, & Oksana Borisova О. Б. /. (2020). PUBLIC ASSESSMENT OF THE INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN A METROPOLIS: CHALLENGES AND LESSONS OF THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 14(1), 88–96. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/3104