MILITARIZATION OF THE ENEMY IMAGE IN THE MODERN RUSSIAN SOCIO-POLITICAL DISCOURSE
Keywords:
state power, non-systemic opposition, securitization, enemification, hate speech, image of enemy, oc-cupant, traitorAbstract
The article deals with the special aspects of creating enemy images in Russia in the period of the socio-political crisis caused by the 2011/2012 elections. Since 2011, securitization of socio-political space became a key strategy of Russia’s domestic policy and the official rhetoric acquired a conservative national discourse. The change in the depoliticization strategy has led to the redetermination of the key actors in power relations. The most extreme forms of enemification in modern Russia’s socio-political discourse turned to be militaristic and can be reduced to two main concepts: ‘traitor’ and ‘occupant’.The restriction of the political space inevitably leads to intensifying ‘aggressive rhetoric’ in the political discourse. In this case, those excluded have to pursue controversial policies. On the one hand, the excluded part tries to return to the political space. On the other hand, it implements a counterstrategy of securitization built around the concept of occupation.Enemification strategies in modern Russia are closely connected with memory practices. The Great Patriotic War is supposed to be in the center of social memory and such words as ‘occupant’ or ‘traitor’ are identified with Nazism and, therefore, have extremely negative connotations.The process of enemification in modern Russia’s socio-political discourse can be examined from different points of view. Firstly, enemification is an important part of the nation-building and self-determination of any political community. Secondly, militarization of discourse indicates special cultural aspects of Russia’s social memory. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2019-2-17-26References
Гельман, В. Я. (2015). ‘Политика страха: как российский режим противостоит своим противникам’, Контрапункт, 1, сс. 1‒11. [Gel'man, V. Ya. (2015) ‘The Poli-tics of Fear. How the Russian Regime Confronts Its Opponents’ [Politika strakha: kak rossiiskii rezhim protivostoit svoim protivnikam], Kontrapunkt, 1, pp. 1‒11. (In Russ.)].
Макарычев, А. С. (2008). ‘Безопасность и воз-вращение политического: критические дебаты в Европе’, Индекс безопасности, Т. 14. 4, сс. 25‒40. [Makarychev, A. S. (2008) ‘Security and the Return of the Political: the Critical Debates in Europe’ [Bezopasnost' i vozvrashchenie politich-eskogo: kriticheskie debaty v Evrope], Se-curity Index, Vol. 14, 4, pp. 25‒40. (In Russ.)].
Макарычев, А. С. (2013) ‘Онтологическая депрессия и отсутствующий центр идеологии: Россия глазами зарубежных экспертов’, Неприкосновенный запас, 6 (92), cc. 245‒251. [Makarychev, A. S. (2013) ‘Ontological Depression and the Absence of Ideological Centre: Russia as viewed by the Western Experts’ [Ontolog-icheskaya depressiya i otsutstvuyushchii tsentr ideologii: Rossiya glazami za-rubezhnykh ekspertov], NZ, 6 (92), pp. 245–251. (In Russ.)].
Мороз, А. Б. (2012). ‘Протестный фольклор декабря 2011. Старое и новое’, Антропологический форум, 16 online, cc. 173–192. [Moroz, A. B. (2012) ‘The “Folk-lore” of Protest Demonstrations in De-cember 2011. The Old and the New’ [Protestnyi fol'klor dekabrya 2011. Staroe i novoe], Antropologicheskij Forum, 16 online, pp. 173–192. (In Russ.)].
Нойманн, И. (2004). Использование «Другого»: Образы Востока в формировании европейских идентичностей; пер. с англ. И.А. Пильщикова. Москва: Новое издательство. [Neumann, I. (2004) Uses of the Other: ‘The East’ in European Iden-tity Formation [Ispol'zovanie «Drugogo»: Obrazy Vostoka v formirovanii evro-peiskikh identichnostei]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel'stvo Publ. (In Russ.)].
Радченко, Д. и Архипова, А. (2018) ‘Укроп и ватник: язык вражды российско-украинского конфликта как нападение и защита’, Ab Imperio, 1. cc. 191‒220. [Radchenko, D., Arkhipova, A. (2018) ‘The Dill and the Watchcoat: The Hate Speech of the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict as Attack and Defense’ [Ukrop i vatnik: “yazyk vrazhdy” rossiisko-ukrainskogo konflikta kak napadenie i zashchita], Ab Imperio, 1, pp. 191‒222. (In Russ.)].
Рансьер, Ж. (2006). На краю политического. Москва: Праксис. [Rancière, J. (2006) On the Shores of Politics [Na krayu politicheskogo]. Moscow: Praksis Publ. (In Russ.)].
Якушина, О. (2012). Теория секьюритизации в международных отношениях. URL: http://www.geopolitica.ru/article/teoriya-sekyuritizacii-v-mezhdunarodnyh-otnosheniyah-ch1#.VwRmaZyLRMw (дата доступа: 05.08.2018). [Yakushina, O. (2012) Theory of Securitization in In-ternational Relations [Teoriya sek'yuriti-zatsii v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheni-yakh]. Available at: http://www.geopolitica.ru/article/teoriya-sekyuritizacii-v-mezhdunarodnyh-otnosheniyah-ch1#.VwRmaZyLRMw (Accessed: 22 January 2019). (In Russ.)].
Butler, J. (2006) The Power of Mourning and Violence. London; New York: Verso.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., de Wilde, J. (1998) Securi-ty: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Edkins, J. (1999) Poststructuralism and Interna-tional Relations. Bringing the Political Back In. Boulder. CO: Lynne Rienner.
Gelman, V. (2015) ‘The Politics of Fear. How the Russian Regime Confronts Its Opponents’, Russian Politics and Law, Vol. 53, 5–6, pp. 10–21.
Lipman, M. (2013) ‘The Kremlin Turns Ideologi-cal: Where This New Direction Could Lead’ in: Lipman, M., Petrov, N. (eds.) Russia 2025: Scenarios for the Russian Future. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 220–239.
Makarychev, A., Yatsyk, A. (2014) ‘A New Rus-sian Conservatism: Domestic Roots and Repercussions for Europe’, Notes Inter-nacionals, 93, pp. 1–6.
Makarychev, A. (2008) ‘Politics, the State, and De-Politicization’, Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 55, 5, pp. 62–71.
Morozov, V. (2015) Russia’s Postcolonial Identi-ty. A Subaltern Empire in a Eurocentric World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rieber, R.W., Kelly, R.J. (1999) ‘Substance and Shadow: Images of the Enemy’ in: Rieber, R.W. (ed.) The Psychology of War and Peace: the Image of the Enemy. New York: Plenum Press.
Robinson, N. (2014) The Political Origins of Rus-sia's “culture Wars”. Limerick: University of Limerick.
Žižek, S. (1998) ‘A Leftist Plea for “Eurocen-trism”’, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 24, 4, pp. 991–993.
Žižek, S. (2004) The Lesson of Rancière in: Rancière, J. The Politics of Aesthetics. London & New York: Continuum, pp. 72–75.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.