TRANSFORMATION OF THE REGIONAL POLITICAL REGIME IN MOSCOW OBLAST: MUNICIPAL REFORM AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ELECTORAL PROCESS

Authors

Keywords:

subnational authoritarianism, regime transformations, political machines, region-al legislatures, federal elections, regional political regime, electoral authoritarian-ism.

Abstract

The article analyzes the transformation of the regional political regime in Moscow Oblast from the decentralized type to the centralized one. Centralized subnational authoritarianism is understood as the implementation of the federal center policy to incorporate regional and local elites into the system of national electoral authoritarianism. The authors examine the institutional context of transformations: the reform of urban development authorities, understood as the process of redistributing rental flows, and the limitation of political autonomy by transforming the procedure for occupying elected offices. The transformation of formal institutions made the political process more predictable, though it led to a number of unobvious results, which included the increase in the importance of informal procedures in the political process. In turn, it led to restriction of the access to political participation. The results of the elections (Moscow Regional and State Duma campaigns of 2011 and 2016, and the governor election of 2018) show that the mayors being ‘old-timers’ managed to provide better electoral results for the ruling party than the newly appointed loyal mayors. The authors conclude that dismantling of old ‘political machines’ has led to the reduction of electoral support for the ruling party in the Moscow region on average. Thus, political centralization, which made the political process more predictable, led to the unforeseen consequences such as the decrease in the ability of municipal authorities to provide electoral support for the ruling party. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2019-1-33-46

Author Biographies

Алексей Симоянов / Aleksey Simoyanov, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

postgraduate student

Антон Городничев / Anton Gorodnichev, National Research University Higher School of Economics

master of urban planning, teacher

Антон Воробьев / Anton Vorobyev, National Research University Higher School of Economics

candidate of political Sciences, first Deputy Dean of the Faculty of urban and regional development, senior researcher

References

Авдонин, В. (2014) ‘Региональные политические практики. Как ре-гиональная автократия «адаптирует» политические реформы на региональном и муниципальном уровнях (Случай Рязанской области)’, PRO NUNC. Современные политические процессы, 1, сc. 57‒83. [Avdon-in, V. (2014) ‘The way regional autocracy ‘adapts’ political re-forms at the regional and munici-pal levels (on the example of the Ryazan Region)’ [Regional'nye politicheskie praktiki. Kak re-gional'naya avtokratiya «adaptiruet» politicheskie reformy na regional'nom i muni-tsipal'nom urovnyakh (Sluchai Ryazanskoi oblasti)], PRO NUNC, 1, pр. 57‒83. (In Russ.)].

Гайворонский, Ю. (2015) Влияние политики федерального центра на трансформацию региональных политических режимов в России: дис. … к.п.н. Москва. [Gaivoronskii, Yu. (2015) ‘Influ-ence of the policy of the federal center on the transformation of regional political regimes in Rus-sia’ [Vliyanie politiki feder-al'nogo tsentra na transformatsi-yu regional'nykh politicheskikh rezhimov v Rossii]. Cand. Diss. (Polit.). Moscow. (In Russ.)].

Гельман, В. (2008) Динамика субнационального авторитаризма: Россия в сравнительной перспективе. Санкт-Петербург.: Изд-во Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге. [Gel’man, V. (2008) The dynam-ics of sub-national authoritarian-ism: Russia in comparative per-spective [Dinamika subnatsion-al'nogo avtoritarizma: Rossiya v sravnitel'noi perspektive]. St. Pe-tersburg: EUSP Press. (In Russ.)].

Городничев, А. (2016) ‘Московская область: политика упрощения в эпоху всеобщего усложнения’, Политком.РУ, 22 ноября [электронный документ]. URL: http://politcom.ru/21788.html (дата обращения: 20.10.2018). [Gorodnichev, A. (2016) ‘The Moscow Region: the policy of simplification in the era of gen-eral complication’ [Moskovskaya oblast': politika uproshcheniya v epokhu vseobshchego uslozhneniya] [online]. Available at: http://politcom.ru/21788.html (Accessed: 20 October 2018). (In Russ.)].

Городничев, А. (2016) ‘Подмосковная централизация: первые итоги градостроительной реформы’, Политком.РУ, 1 февраля [электронное издание]. URL: http://politcom.ru/21661.html (дата обращения: 20.10.2018). [Gorodnichev, A. (2016) ‘The Moscow Region’s centralization: the first results of urban devel-opment reform’ [Podmoskovna-ya tsentralizatsiya: pervye itogi gradostroitel'noi reformy] [online]. Available at: http://politcom.ru/21661.html (Accessed: 20 October 2018). (In Russ.)].

Зотов, В.Б., Мусинова, Н.Н. (2016) ‘Реформа организации муниципальной власти в России: плюсы и минусы’, Муниципальная академия, 1, сс. 111‒116. [Zotov, V.B., Musinova, N.N. (2016) ‘The reform of the organi-zation of the municipal govern-ment in Russia: pluses and mi-nuses’ [Reforma organizatsii mu-nitsipal'noi vlasti v Rossii: plyusy i minusy], Municipal Academy, 1, рp. 111‒116. (In Russ.)].

Кынев, А. (2007) ‘Подмосковный «бублик» и «Боевое братство»’, Демократия.ру, 1 февраля [электронное издание]. URL: http://www.democracy.ru/article.php?id=1369 (дата обращения: 20.10.2018). [Kynev, A. (2007) ‘Moscow Region’s “bagel” and “Boevoe bratstvo”’ [Podmos-kovnyi “bublik” i “Boevoe bratstvo”] [online]. Available at: http://www.democracy.ru/article.php?id=1369 (Accessed: 20 Oc-tober 2018)].

Ледяев, В.Г., Чирикова, А.Е. (2013) ‘Губернатор и его команда в пространстве городской политики малых российских городов’, Вестник Пермского университета. Сер. Политология, 3, сc. 4‒25. [Ledyaev, V.G., Chi-rikova, A.E. (2013) ‘Governor and his team in the political arena of small Russian towns’ [Guber-nator i ego komanda v pros-transtve gorodskoi politiki malykh rossiiskikh gorodov], Review of Political Science, 3, рp. 4‒25. (In Russ.)].

Петров, Н., Титков, А. (2013) Рейтинг демократичности регионов Московского центра Карнеги: 10 лет в строю. Москва: Московский центр Карнеги. [Petrov, N., Titkov, A. (2013) Carnegie Moscow Center’s democracy rat-ing of Russian regions: 10 years in service [Reiting demokratich-nosti regionov Moskovskogo tsentra Karnegi: 10 let v stroyu]. Moscow: Moscow Carnegie Cen-ter Publ. (In Russ.)].

Трутнев, Э.К. (2015) ‘Город и право: логика циклического разверты-вания и свертывания из прошлого в будущее и из настоя-щего в прошлое институтов правового градорегулирования в постсоветской России’, Городские исследования и практики, Пилотный выпуск, сс. 13‒32. [Trutnev, E.K. (2015) ‘The city and the law: the legal institutions cycling evolution log-ic in the post-Soviet Russia’ [Go-rod i pravo: logika tsiklicheskogo razvertyvaniya i svertyvaniya iz proshlogo v budushchee i iz nas-toyashchego v proshloe insti-tutov pravovogo gradoreguliro-vaniya v postsovetskoi Rossii], Urban Studies and Prac-tices, Pilot Issue, pр. 13‒32. (In Russ.)].

Туровский, Р.Ф. (2013) ‘Местное самоуправление в России как агент в принципал-агентских отношениях с государственной властью’, Социально-экономические явления и процессы, 12, сс. 159‒167. [Turov-skii, R.F. (2013) ‘Local govern-ment in Russia as the agent in principal-agent relations with the government’ [Mestnoe samou-pravlenie v Rossii kak agent v printsipal-agentskikh otnosheni-yakh s gosudarstvennoi vlast'yu], Social and Economic Phenomena and Processes, 12, рp. 159‒167. (In Russ.)].

Туровский, Р.Ф. (2015) ‘Электоральная конкуренция на субнацио-нальном уровне в России: легитимность, централизация и клиентелизм’ в: Ясин, Е.Г. (ред.) XV апрельская международная научная конференция по проблемам развития экономики и общества: в 4 кн. (Кн. 4). Москва: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, сс. 449‒458. [Turovskii, R.F. (2015) ‘Electoral competition at the sub-national level in Russia: legitima-cy, centralization, and clientelism’ [Elektoral'naya konkurentsiya na subnatsion-al'nom urovne v Rossii: legitim-nost', tsentralizatsiya i klientelizm] in: Yasin, E.G. (ed.) ‘The XV April International Ac-ademic Conference on Economic and Social Development: in 4 vols. [XV aprel'skaya mezhdu-narodnaya nauchnaya konfer-entsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva: v 4 knigakh], Vol. 4. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, pр. 449‒458. (In Russ.)].

Туровский, Р.Ф. (2013) ‘Эффективность и демократичность реги-ональных политических режимов в современной России: противоречия теории и практики измерения’, PolitBook, 1, сс. 8‒39. [Turovskii, R.F. (2013) ‘Ef-fectiveness and democracy scores of regional political regimes in modern Russia: the controversy of measurement’s theory and practice’ [Effektivnost' i demo-kratichnost' regional'nykh politicheskikh rezhimov v sov-remennoi Rossii: protivorechiya teorii i praktiki izmereniya], Pol-itBook, 1, рp. 8‒39. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А.Е., Ледяев, В.Г. (2017) Власть в малом российском го-роде. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики. [Chirikova, A.E., Ledyaev, V.G. (2017) Governance in Russian town [Vlast' v malom rossiiskom gorode]. Moscow: HSE Publish-ing House, DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-1579-2. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А.Е., Ледяев, В.Г., Ледяева, О.М. (2015) ‘Муниципальная реформа и распределение власти в руководстве малого российского города’, Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки, 4, сс. 7‒16. [Chirikova, A.E., Le-dyaev, V.G. and Ledyaeva, O.M. (2015) ‘Municipal reform and the distribution of power in admin-istration of a small Russian town’ [Munitsipal'naya reforma i raspredelenie vlasti v rukovod-stve malogo rossiiskogo goroda], Tambov University Review. Se-ries: Humanities, 4, рp. 7‒16. (In Russ.)].

Demchenko, O. and Golosov, G.V. (2016) ‘Federalism, gubernatorial power and the incorporation of subnational authoritarianism in Russia: A theory-testing empiri-cal inquiry’, Acta Politica, 51(1), рp. 61‒79, DOI: 10.1057/ap.2014.37.

Gel’man, V. and Ryzhenkov, S. (2011) ‘Local regimes, sub-national gov-ernance and the ‘power vertical’ in contemporary Russia’, Eu-rope-Asia Studies, 63(3), pр. 449‒465, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2011.557538.

Gibson, E.L. (2005) ‘Boundary control: subnational authoritarianism in democratic countries’, World Pol-itics, 58(1), pр. 101‒132.

Golosov, G. (2011) ‘The regional roots of electoral authoritarianism in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 63(4), pр. 623‒639, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566427.

Golosov, G.V. (2015) ‘Do spoilers make a difference? Instrumental manipulation of political parties in an electoral authoritarian re-gime, the case of Russia’, East European Politics, 31(2), pр. 170‒186, DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1035780.

Golosov, G.V. (2016) ‘The September 2015 regional elections in Russia: a rehearsal for next year’s na-tional legislative races’, Regional & Federal Studies, 26(2), pр. 255‒268, DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2015.1124865.

Golosov, G.V., Gushchina, K. and Ko-nonenko, P. (2016) ‘Russia’s lo-cal government in the process of authoritarian regime transfor-mation: incentives for the surviv-al of local democracy’, Local Government Studies, 42(4), рp. 507‒526, DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2016.1154848.

Panov, P. (2016) ‘How do governors build a power vertical in the con-text of mayoral elections?’, Rus-sian Politics, 1(3), pр. 252‒268, DOI: 10.1163/2451-8921-00103002.

Sirotkina, E. and Karandashova, S. (2016) How multilevel elite loyal-ty strengthens electoral authori-tarianism: evidence from guberna-torial elections in Russia [online]. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2016/08/08/1119390165/36PS2016.pdf (Accessed: 20 October 2018).

Published

2019-04-29

How to Cite

Aleksey Simoyanov А. С. /, Anton Gorodnichev А. Г. /, & Anton Vorobyev А. В. /. (2019). TRANSFORMATION OF THE REGIONAL POLITICAL REGIME IN MOSCOW OBLAST: MUNICIPAL REFORM AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ELECTORAL PROCESS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 13(1), 33–46. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/2277

Issue

Section

Статьи