CREDIBLE COMMITMENT OR INCREDIBLE DEMANDS? EU CONDITIONALITY IN THE WESTERN BALKANS

Authors

Keywords:

conditionality, enlargement, Western Balkans, democratization

Abstract

The article deals with the EU’s approach to conditionality policy in the Western Balkans. EU membership conditionality is generally believed to be one of the most effective tools at the EU’s disposal to foster stability and democracy in the neighboring regions. However, the economic crisis that hit the Eurozone in 2007/2008 and the subsequent rise in Euroscepticism raised a question whether the incentives provided by the membership perspective are as convincing for new candidates and potential candidates as they were for the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. The article shows that, whilst the EU remains committed to the enlargement process in the Western Balkans, the transformations that the EU’s approach has undergone have negatively affected the overall level of the Western Balkans’s membership perspective. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2019-1-15-23

Author Biography

Tatiana Rudneva / Татьяна Руднева, National Research University Higher School of Economics

postgraduate student

References

Bieber, F. (2011) ‘Building Impossible States? State-Building Strategies and EU Membership in the West-ern Balkans’, Europe-Asia Stud-ies, 63(10), pp. 1783–1802, DOI:10.1080/09668136.2011.618679.

Böhmelt, T., Freyburg, T. (2013) ‘The temporal dimension of the credi-bility of EU conditionality and candidate states’ compliance with the acquis communautaire, 1998-2009’, European Union Politics, 14(2), pp. 250–272, DOI:10.1177/1465116512458164.

Phinnemore, D. (2013) ‘The Stabilisa-tion and Association Process: A Framework for European Union Enlargement?’ in Elbasani, A. (ed.) European integration and transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or business as usual? Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 22–35.

Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S., Knobel, H. (2003) ‘Costs, commitment and compliance: The impact of EU democratic conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey’, JCMS, 41(3), pp. 495‒518, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00432.

Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S., Knobel, H. (2006) International Socializa-tion in Europe: European Organ-izations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Change. Basing-stoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Schimmelfennig, F., Sedelmeier, U. (2004) ‘Governance by condi-tionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), pp. 661–679, DOI: 10.1080/1350176042000248089.

Schimmelfennig, F. (2008) ‘EU political accession conditionality after the 2004 enlargement: consistency and effectiveness’, Journal of Eu-ropean Public Policy, 15(6), pp. 918–937, DOI: 10.1080/13501760802196861.

Vachudova, A.M. (2005) Europe Un-divided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Com-munism. Oxford: OUP.

Vachudova, A.M. (2014) ‘EU Leverage and National Interests in the Balkans: The Puzzles of En-largement Ten Years On’, JCMS, 52(1), pp. 122–138, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12081.

Published

2019-04-29

How to Cite

Татьяна Руднева T. R. /. (2019). CREDIBLE COMMITMENT OR INCREDIBLE DEMANDS? EU CONDITIONALITY IN THE WESTERN BALKANS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 13(1), 15–23. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/2275

Issue

Section

Статьи