THE EUROPEAN UNION’S COOPERATION WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF ORGANIZATIONAL THEO-RY

Authors

  • Дарья Моисеева / Dariya Moiseeva Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Rela-tions, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS) http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-4019

Keywords:

organizational field, institutional isomorphism, organizational theory, interna-tional organizations, European Union, parallel representation, global governance

Abstract

Cooperation with international organizations and regimes is an integral part of the European Union’s foreign policy. The purpose of the article is to systematize the reader’s perception of the EU’s relations with international organizations at present. The author relies on the organizational theory and, following that, introduces the concepts ‘organizational field’ and ‘institutional isomorphism’, as applied to the EU’s relations with international organizations. Based on the analysis, the author developed a typology of the EU’s relations with international organizations. A key feature in building the typology was the EU’s status in international organizations, which varies from full membership with the right to vote to the absence of any formal status. In total, there were identified five possible scenarios for the development of the EU’s relations with international organizations. It was discovered that the main obstacle to cooperation between them is the Bretton Woods nature of most modern international organizations and, as a result, their focus on working with sovereign states. The article also describes such a phenomenon of international relations as parallel representation – a situation when both the EU itself and its member states are full members of the organization. The developed typology not only systematizes the actual knowledge of the subject and explains the reasons why cooperation develops in different ways, but also confirms the cognitive potential of the organizational theory in analyzing the EU’s actions in the international arena. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2018-4-153-165

Author Biography

Дарья Моисеева / Dariya Moiseeva, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Rela-tions, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)

candidate of Political Sciences, researcher

References

Александров, О.Б. (2013) ‘Интересы и приоритеты Арктической стратегии Евросоюза’, Вестник МГИМО-Университета, 3(30), cc. 12–17. [Ale-ksandrov, O.B. (2013) ‘The EU’s Arctic strategy: interests and priorities’ [Interesy i prioritety Arkticheskoi strategii Evrosoyuza], MGIMO Review of International Relations, 3(30), рp. 12–17. (In Russ.)].

Говорова, Н.В. (2016) ‘Комплексная Арктическая политика ЕС’, Аналитическая записка (Институт Европы РАН), 13(43), p5. [Govorova, N.V. (2016) ‘A comprehensive EU Arctic policy’ [Kompleksnaya Arkticheskaya politika ES], Analytical papers of IE RAS, 13(43), p. 5. (In Russ.)].

ДиМаджио, П.Дж., Пауэлл, У.В. (2010) ‘Новый взгляд на «железную клетку»: институциональный изоморфизм и коллективная рациональность в организационных полях’, Экономическая социология, 1(11), сс. 34–56. [DiMaggio, P., Powell, W. (2010) ‘The iron cage revisited: institu-tional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’ [No-vyi vzglyad na «zheleznuyu kletku»: institutsional'nyi izomorfizm i kollek-tivnaya ratsional'nost' v organizatsionnykh polyakh], Journal of Economic Sociology, 1(11), pp. 34–56. (In Russ.)].

Громыко, Ал.А., Носов, М.Г. (ред.) (2015) Европейский союз в поиске гло-бальной роли: политика, экономика, безопасность. Москва: Весь мир. [Gromyko, A.A., Nosov, M.G. (eds.) (2015) The European Union in search for a global role: politics, economy, security [Evropeiskii soyuz v poiske global'noi roli: politika, ekonomika, bezopasnost’]. Moscow: Ves' mir Publ. (In Russ.)].

‘ЕС и ИКАО: отмечая достижения’ (2009), Журнал ИКАО, 4(64), сс. 28–31. [‘The EC and ICAO: Celebrating accomplishments’ [EK i IKAO: otmecha-ya dostizheniya], ICAO Journal, 4(64), pp. 28–31. (In Russ.)].

Исполинов, А.С. (2015) ‘Суд Европейского Союза против присоединения ЕС к Европейской конвенции по правам человека (причины и следствия)’, Международное правосудие, 1, сс. 118–134. [Ispolinov, A.S. (2015) ‘Second veto of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the acces-sion of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights’ [Sud Evropeiskogo Soyuza protiv prisoedineniya ES k Evro-peiskoi konventsii po pravam cheloveka (prichiny i sledstviya)], Interna-tional Justice, 1, рp. 118–134. (In Russ.)].

Гусев, К.Н. (ред.) (2017) Комплексная Арктическая стратегия ЕС. СПб.: Нестор-История. [Gusev, K.N. (ed.) (2017) A comprehensive EU Arctic strategy [Kompleksnaya Arkticheskaya strategiya ES]. St. Petersburg: Nes-tor-Istoriya Publ. (In Russ.)].

Прохоренко, И.Л. (2015) ‘Глобальная роль Евросоюза: что и как объясняет организационная теория’, Вестник Пермского университета. Полито-логия, 2, сс. 5–17. [Prokhorenko, I.L. (2015) ‘ The European Union’s global role: what and how can organizational theory explain’ [Global'naya rol' Evrosoyuza: chto i kak ob"yasnyaet organizatsionnaya teoriya], Re-view of Political Science, 2, pp. 5–17. (In Russ.)].

Прохоренко, И.Л. (2014) ‘Организационная теория в анализе глобального управления’, Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25. Между-народные отношения и мировая политика, 3, сс. 150–173. [Prokhoren-ko, I.L. (2014) ‘Organizational theory in the analysis of global governance’ [Organizatsionnaya teoriya v analize global'nogo upravleniya], Moscow University Journal of World Politics, 3, pp. 150–173. (In Russ.)].

Руденкова, Д.Э. (2015) ‘«Рыбные войны» с участием Европейского союза’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 6, сс. 70–80. [Rudenkova, D.E. (2015) ‘The European Union “Fish Wars”’ [«Rybnye voiny» s uchastiem Evropeiskogo soyuza], Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 6, pp. 70–80. (In Russ.)].

Стрежнева, М.В. (2014) ‘Территориальный и функциональный типы организации политических пространств (в развитие интеграционной теории)’, Политическая наука, 2, сс. 32–43. [Strezhneva, M.V. (2014) ‘Territorial and functional types of political space organization’ [Territorial'nyi i funktsional'nyi tipy organizatsii politicheskikh prostranstv (v razvitie inte-gratsionnoi teorii)], Political Science, 2, pp. 32–43. (In Russ.)].

Стрежнева, М.В. (2016) ‘Приверженность Евросоюза принципу многосторонности в условиях трансформации мирового порядка’, Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25: Международные отношения и мировая политика, 2, сс. 3–30. [Strezhneva, M.V. (2016) ‘The European Union's adherence to the principle of multilateralism in the context of the world order transformation’ [Priverzhennost' Evrosoyuza printsipu mnogostoronnosti v usloviyakh transformatsii mirovogo poryadka], Mos-cow University Journal of World Politics, 2, pp. 3–30. (In Russ.)].

Стрежнева, М.В., Руденкова, Д.Э. (2016) Европейский союз: архитектура внешней политики. Москва: ИМЭМО РАН. [Strezhneva, M.V., Ruden-kova, D.E. (2016) The European Union: the architecture of foreign policy [Evropeiskii soyuz: arkhitektura vneshnei politiki]. Moscow: IMEMO RAS Publ. (In Russ.)].

Kissack, R. (2010) Pursuing effective multilateralism. Houndmills: Palgrave Mac-millan.

March, J.G., Olsen, J.P. (1984) ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Fac-tors in Political Life’, The American Political Science Review, 78(3), pp. 734–749.

Murdoch, Z. (2015) ‘Organization Theory and the Study of European Union In-stitutions: Lessons and Opportunities’, Organization Studies, 36, pp. 1675–1692, DOI:

1177/0170840615585342.

Drieskens, E., van Schaik, L.G. (eds.) (2014) The EU and effective multilateralism. Internal and external reform practices. New York: Routledge.

Wouters, J., Bruyninckx, H., Basu, S., Schunz, S. (eds.) (2012) The European Union and multilateral governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Published

2019-01-03

How to Cite

Dariya Moiseeva Д. М. /. (2019). THE EUROPEAN UNION’S COOPERATION WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF ORGANIZATIONAL THEO-RY. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 12(4), 153–165. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/2075