SURVIVAL ANALYSIS FOR AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES IN RE-SOURCE RENT ECONOMIES: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL

Authors

Keywords:

resource rent economy, resource dependence, natural resource rent, authoritarian regime, Cox regression, survival analysis, proportional hazards model, quality of governance

Abstract

Most researchers believe that states rich in natural resources are more able to maintain stability than those lacking resources. This research deals with exceptions that do not fit into this proposition. Based on the idea that the state’s ability to extract resources places it under certain obligations to secure the public contract, the author hypothesizes that the quality of governance mediates the influence of resource dependence on the stability of the autocracy. This factor is operationalized as the ability to pursue the declared policy and to distribute the public goods effectively. Using Cox regression, the author conducted a survival analysis, which made it possible to statistically substantiate this assumption, being theoretically justified and observed in some resource rent economies. The analysis showed that the survival time of the authoritarian regime increases if the indicators of governance quality are high. The author tackles the issue of quantitative measurement of resource dependence and argues in favor of using the share of natural resources rents in GDP as such indicator. The article also identifies the limitations and possibilities of Cox regression in analyzing the survival capacity of autocracies and makes suggestions for improving the proportional hazards model. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2018-4-122-139

Author Biography

Юлия Шулика / Yuliya Shulika, National Research University Higher School of Economics

postgraduate Student, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences,

References

Рязанов, В.Т. (2011) Экономика рентных отношений в современной России, Христианское чтение, 4 (39), сс. 149–176. [Ryazanov, V.T. (2011) ‘The economy of rental relations in modern Russia’ [Ekonomika rentnykh otnoshenii v sovremennoi Rossii], Khristianskoye chteniye, 4 (39), pp. 149–176. (In Russ.)]

Abulof, U. (2015) ‘«Can’t Buy Me Legitimacy»: The Elusive and Illusive Stabil-ity of Mideast Rentier Regimes’, Journal of International Relations and De-velopment, 35 p.

Caselli, F. (2006) Power Struggles and the Natural Resource Curse, 20 p.

Charron, N. and Lapuente, V. (2011) ‘Which Dictators Produce Quality of Gov-ernment?’, Studies of Comparative International Development, 46(4), pp. 397–423.

Cuaresma, J.C., Oberhofer, H. and Raschky, P. (2011) ‘Oil and the duration of dictatorships’, Public Choice, 148, pp. 505–530.

Fish, S. and Wittenberg, J. (2009). ‘Failed Democratization’ in Haerpfer, Ch., Bernhagen, P., Inglehart, R.F., Welzel, Ch. (eds.) Democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–265.

Gandhi, J. and Przeworski, A. (2007) ‘Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats’, Comparative political studies, Vol. 40, 11, pp. 1279–1301.

Geddes, B., Wright, J. and Frantz, E. (2014) ‘Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set’, Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), pp. 313–331.

Hadenius, A., Wahman, M. and Teorell, J. (2013) ‘Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective’, Contemporary Politics, Vol. 19, 1, pp. 19–34.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2010) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Policy Research working paper, WPS 5430. The World Bank [online]. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/3913.

Luong, P. J. and Weinthal, E. (2010) Oil is not a curse. Cambridge University Press, 425 p.

Moller, J. and Skaaning, S. (2011) ‘Stateness First?’, Democratization, 18(1), pp. 1–24.

Roll, M. (2012) Demokratie statt Ressourcenfluch. Ein neues Model für ölreiche Entwicklungsländer. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung [online]. Available at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/09152.pdf.

Ross, M.L. (1999) The Political Economy of the resource curse, Vol. 51, 2, pp. 297–322.

Ross, M.L. (2001) ‘Does Oil hinder Democracy?’, World Politics, 53, pp. 325–361.

Ross, M.L. (2008) ‘Blood barrels: Why oil wealth fuels conflict’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87, 3, pp. 2–8.

Smith, B. (2004) ‘Oil wealth and regime survival in the developing World, 1960-1999’, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, 2, pp. 232–246.

Taagepera, R. (2017) ‘Science walks on two legs, but social sciences try to hop on one’, International Political Science Review, Vol. 39, 1, pp. 145–159.

Teorell, J. (2010) Determinants of Democratization. Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–160.

Tilly, C. (2007) Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 234 p.

Treisman, D. (2010) Oil and Democracy in Russia. National Bureau of Economic research, 24 p.

Tsui, K.K. (2011) ‘More oil – less Democracy’, The Economic Journal, Vol. 121, 551, pp. 89–115.

Youngs, R. (2008) Energy: A Reinforced obstacle to Democracy? CEPS Working Document No. 299.

Published

2019-01-03

How to Cite

Yuliya Shulika Ю. Ш. /. (2019). SURVIVAL ANALYSIS FOR AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES IN RE-SOURCE RENT ECONOMIES: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 12(4), 122–139. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/2073