Traditions of Russian Power: Robust Stability or Non-Alternative Predetermination?

Authors

  • Татьяна Ндайишимийе / Tatiana Ndayishimiye Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Keywords:

power efficiency, political traditions, methods of governance, political actors, "facade" democracy

Abstract

The article analyses various aspects of Russian political power functioning through the prism of political traditions. Russian power is considered as the main political actor and innovator that consciously does not allow other actors to govern the country, thereby creating and strengthening the traditions of intransigence and absence of a dialogue between potential participants of the political process. As a result, the civil society and its institutions have not historically developed the capacity for political independenceDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2015-3-104-115

Author Biography

Татьяна Ндайишимийе / Tatiana Ndayishimiye, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Postgraduate Student

References

Weber M. Russia’s transition to pseudo-constitutionalism // Polis. 2006. No. 2. (In Rus.).

Gaman-Golutvina O. V. Russian parliamentarism from the historical retrospective and comparative perspective (I) // Polis. 2006. No. 2. (In Rus.).

Glebova I. I. Political culture of modern Russia: images of the new Russian authorities and social schisms // Polis. 2006. No. 1. (In Rus.).

Dakhin A.V. The system of government in Russia: a phenomenological transit // Polis. 2006. No. 3. (In Rus.).

Zhuravlev V. V. Society and power in Russia: historical traditions and perspectives of interaction / Where is Russia heading for? General and specific features of modern development. M., 1997. (In Rus.).

Karamzin M. N. Memoir on ancient and modern Russia. M.: Nauka, 1991. (In Rus.).

Klyuchevsky V. O. The course of the Russian history. Complete course of lectures. Moscow, 1995. (In Rus.).

Kustarev S. A. Max Weber on modernization of the Russian autocracy // Polis. 2006. No. 2. (In Rus.).

Ledyaev V. G. Political power: a conceptual analysis // Management consulting. 2009. No. 4. (In Rus.).

Pipes R. Russia under the old regime. M.: Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 1993. (In Rus.).

Pastukhov V. B. Putin's third term as an alternative to political hypocrisy. A remark from a political cynic // Polis. 2006. No. 2. (In Rus.).

Pivovarov Yu. S. Russian government and public policy. Notes of a historian on the reasons for the failure of democratic transition // Polis. 2006. No. 1. (In Rus.).

Smirnov A. The State Duma of the Russian Empire. 1906 – 1917. M., 1998. (In Rus.).

Shestopal E. B. Images of the power in post-Soviet Russia: political and psychological analysis. M., 2004. (In Rus.).

Shishkov V. V. The problems of modern Russia’s policy post-Imperial adaptation // Perm University Herald. Series: Political Science. 2014. No. 2. (In Rus.).

Ethnic-demographic processes and migration of society in the East of Russia: history and modernity / ed. by V. I. Dyatlov and K. V. Grigorichev. Irkutsk: "Ottisk", 2012. (In Rus.).

Published

2018-11-15

How to Cite

Tatiana Ndayishimiye Т. Н. /. (2018). Traditions of Russian Power: Robust Stability or Non-Alternative Predetermination?. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, (3), 104–115. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/1920