Individualism in Writings of Social Capital Theory Followers: Ideological Aspect

Authors

  • Давыдов Дмитрий / Davydov Dmitriy Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Keywords:

social capital theory, individualization, capitalism, welfare state

Abstract

The article considers some scepticism about social capital theory as a set of politicized concepts. It is shown that some ethical concepts concerning individualism and the decline of unity are developed in writings of social capital theory followers. The author considers criticism of these concepts. Critics point out the direct connection between social capital theory and neo-liberal ideology (the idea of the individual as an investor in social capital). They believe that neo-liberal order breaks social links and promotes fragmentation. They also show that the highest rates of “social capital” (trust) are observed in the countries where the state contributes to equitable distribution of wealth (“Swedish socialism”). However, according to the author these findings do not provide a complete picture of the crisis of individualism. It should be remembered that individualism and alienation are also the result of material well-being growth. In other words, the welfare state can contribute to erosion of other important forms of “social capital”, besides trust. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2015-3-20-32

Author Biography

Давыдов Дмитрий / Davydov Dmitriy, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Junior Researcher

References

Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Moscow, 2000. (In Rus.).

Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital // Economic Sociology. 2002. Vol. 3. № 5. (In Rus.).

Davydov D. A. Social Capital Theory and Its Normative Controversies // Politeia. 2014. №3. (In Rus.).

Coleman J.S. Social and Human Capital // Social Sciences and Modernity. 2001. № 3. (In Rus.).

Putnam R.D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 1996. (In Rus.).

Pesotskiy A. Swedish Socialism. Erosion of Labour // Echo Moskvy. Available at: http://www.echo.msk.ru/blog/pesotskiy/1155862-echo/ (accessed: 10.02.2015). (In Rus.).

Klinenberg E. Going Solo: The new social reality. Moscow: Alpina non-fikshn Publ., 2014. (In Rus.).

Fukuyama F. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Moscow: AST: Ermak Publ., 2004. (In Rus.).

Fukuyama F. The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. Moscow: AST: Ermak Publ., 2004. (In Rus.).

Bell D. America as a Mass Society // Bell D. (ed) The End of Ideology. New York: Collier Books, 1962. (In English).

Ferragina E. A. Social Capital in Europe: A Comparative Regional Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002. (In English).

Fine B. Theories of Social Capital: Researchers Behaving Badly. London: Pluto Press, 2010. (In English).

Navarro V. A Critique of Social Capital // International Journal of Health Services. Vol. 32. № 3. 2002. (In English).

Nisbet R. A. The Quest for Community. New York: Oxford University Press, 1966; Stein M. R. The Eclipse of Community: an Interpretation of American Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960. (In English).

Oorschot van W., Arts W. The Social Capital of Welfare State: The Crowding Out Hypothesis Revisited // Journal of European Social Policy. 2005. № 15. (In English).

Poder T. G. What is Really Social Capital? A Critical Review // The American Sociologist. 2011. Vol. 32. № 3. (In English).

Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital // Journal of Democracy. 1995. Vol. 6. №1. (In English).

Smith S.S., Kulynych J. It May Be Social, but Why Is It Capital? The Social Construction of Social Capital and the Politics of Language // Politics & Society. 2002. Vol. 30. №. 1. (In English).

Stein M. R. The Eclipse of Community: an Interpretation of American Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960. (In English).

Thompson D. Social Capital and Its Popularity // International Journal of Social Inquiry. 2011. Vol. 4. №. 1. (In English).

Thomson I. T. The Theory That Won't Die: From Mass Society to the Decline of Social Capital // Sociological Forum. 2005. Vol. 20. № 3. (In English).

Twenge J.M., Campbell K.W. The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. New York: Atria Books, 2010. (In English).

Twenge J.M. Generation Me – Revised and Updated: Why today’s Young American Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled – and More Miserable Than Ever Before. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014. (In English).

Published

2018-11-15

How to Cite

Davydov Dmitriy Д. Д. /. (2018). Individualism in Writings of Social Capital Theory Followers: Ideological Aspect. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, (3), 20–32. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/1914