Influence of the Constitutional Design on Longevity of Single-Party Dominance

Authors

  • Александр Порошин Alexander Poroshin National Research University Higher School of Economics

Keywords:

dominant party, constitutional design, parliamentarism, presidentialism

Abstract

The article considers the question of the constitutional design influence on longevity of single-party dominance. Depending on the way the authorities are formed, regimes are divided into two categories – parliamentary and presidential. Based on studying theoretical prerequisites concerning differences between parliamentarism and presidentialism in terms of the influence of a dominant party on election results, ideological identification of power and opposition, complexities in organizing electoral campaigns, the author suggests a hypothesis that parliamentary regimes are more durable. However, one-way ANOVA test has shown no statistically significant differences between parliamentary and presidential regimes in durability of single-party dominance.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2017-1-87-97

Author Biography

Александр Порошин Alexander Poroshin, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Postgraduate student, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences,

References

Дюверже М. Политические партии. М.: Академический проект, 2002. [Duverger M. Political Parties. Moscow, 2002].

Харитонова О.Г. Президентство и демократия: состояние дискуссии // Политическая наука. 2012. № 3. С. 199–213. [Kharitonova O.G. Presidentialism and Democracy: State of Discussion. Political Science. 2012. No. 3. P. 199–213].

Arian A., Barnes S.H. The Dominant Party System: a Neglected Model of Democratic Stability. The Journal of Democracy. 1974. Р. 592–614.

Blondel J. Comparing Political Systems. New York, Praeger, 1972.

Bogaards M. Counting Parties and Identifying Dominant Party System in Africa. European Journal of Political Research. 2004. Р. 173–197.

Boucek F. Electoral and Parliamentary Aspects of Dominant Party Systems. (eds.) Pennings P., Lane J.E. Comparing Party System Change. London, Routledge, 1998. P. 95–115.

Coleman J.S. The Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa. Ed. by Almond G., Coleman J. The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1960. P. 247–368.

Giliomee H., Simkins C. The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.

Greene K.F. Dominant Party Strategy and Democratization. American Journal of Political Science. 2008. Р. 16–31.

Greene K.F. Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition in Dominant Party Regimes: A Theory and the Case of Mexico. Comparative Political Studies. 2002. Р. 755–783.

Greene K.F. The Political Economy of Single-Party Dominance. Comparative Political Studies. 2010. Р. 1–27.

Greene K.F. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Huntington S.P., Moore C. Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-party Systems. New York, Basic Books, 1968.

Köllner P. The Liberal Democratic Party at 50: Sources of Dominance and Change in the Koizumi Era. Social Science Japan Journal. 2006. Р. 243–257.

Kuenzi M., Lambright Party Systems and Democratic Consolidation in Africa’s Electoral Regimes. Party Politics. 2005. Р. 423–446.

Magaloni B. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. S. Mainwaring, T. Scully (eds.). Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1995.

Matlosa K., Karume S. Ten Years of Democracy and the Dominant Party System in South Africa. Election Update 2004: South Africa.

O’Leary B. Britain’s Japanese Question: “Is There a Dominant Party?” H. Margetts, G. Smyth (eds.) Turning Japanese: Britain with a Permanent Party of Government. London, Lawrence and Wishart, 1994. P. 3–8.

Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. T.J. Pempel (eds.). Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1990.

Reuter O.J., Remington T.F. Dominant Party Regimes and The Commitment Problem. The Case of United Russia. Comparative Political Studies. 2009. Р. 501–526.

Samuels D.J., Shugart M.S. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Sartori G. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1976.

Scheiner E. Democracy without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Templeman K.A. The Origins and Decline of Dominant Party Systems: Taiwan’s Transition in Comparative Perspective. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 2012.

Van de Walle N., Butler K. Political Parties and Party Systems in Africa’s Illiberal Democracies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 1999. Р. 14–28. 27. Zaller J. Politicians as Prize Fighters: Electoral Selection and Incumbency Advantage. 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston, MA, 1998.

Published

2018-10-06

How to Cite

Alexander Poroshin А. П. (2018). Influence of the Constitutional Design on Longevity of Single-Party Dominance. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, (1), 87–97. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/1674