THE PAST AS A SYMBOLIC RESOURCE FOR IMAGINING THE FUTURE: BASED ON SPEECHES BY DEPUTIES OF THE STATE DUMA OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF THE VIII CONVOCATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-4-38-48

Keywords:

image of the future, symbolic politics, political use of the past, political construction of the future, State Duma, discursive strategies

Abstract

Although the future is central to public political communication, its articulation is hindered by fundamental uncertainty, intensified by the special military operation. Despite these conditions, politicians must still speak about the future; analyzing how State Duma deputies construct such images reveals both the possibilities and the limits of using the past as a symbolic resource. The study uses transcripts of plenary sessions of the VIII State Duma (2nd–7th sessions) as empirical data, which are analyzed through qualitative content and semantic analysis to identify discursive strategies employing the past to imagine the future. The study concludes that the 1990s, the Soviet era, and the Great Patriotic War perform different but complementary functions in parliamentary discourse, acting as symbolic resources used to construct images of the future. It should be noted that the practices of using the past in the discourse of deputies run counter to the traditional thematic repertoire of the politics of memory of the ruling elites in Russia. The 1990s period in the discourse of deputies acts as the «most convenient tool» used to construct images of the future and overcome its uncertainty in the modern context.  

Author Biography

Andrei Kurbatov, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Student, School of Politics and Governance, Faculty of Social Sciences

References

Гаврилюк, Т. В. (2016) ‘Понятие «образ будущего» в категориальном поле феноменологической психологии’, Общество: социология, психология, педагогика, 5. [Gavrilyuk, T.V. (2016) ‘The “image of the future” concept in the categorical field of the phenomenological psychology’ [Ponyatie «obraz budushchego» v kategorial'nom pole fenomenologicheskoi psikhologii], Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika, 5. (In Russ.)].

Захарова, О. В. (2016) ‘Идентификация и анализ топосов (аргументационных схем) в политическом дискурсе’, Политическая наука, 3, сс. 217–235. [Zakharova, O. V. (2016) ‘Identification and analysis of topoi (argumentative schemes) in political discourse’ [Identifikatsiya i analiz toposov (argumentatsionnykh skhem) v politicheskom diskurse], Politicheskaya nauka, 3, pp. 217–235. (In Russ.)].

Малинова, О. Ю. (2015) ‘Великая Отечественная война как символический ресурс: эволюция отображения в официальной риторике 2000–2010-х гг.’, Россия и современный мир, 2(87), сс. 6–29. [Malinova, O. Yu. (2015) ‘The Great Patriotic War as a Symbolic Resource: The Evolution of the Official Rhetoric 2000-2010’ [Velikaya Otechestvennaya voina kak simvolicheskii resurs: evolyutsiya otobrazheniya v ofitsial'noi ritorike 2000–2010-kh gg.], Rossiya i sovremennyi mir, 2(87), pp. 6–29. (In Russ.)].

Малинова, О. Ю. (2018) ‘Обоснование политики 2000-х годов в дискурсе В. В. Путина и формирование мифа о "лихих девяностых"’, Политическая наука, 3, сс. 45–69. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2018.03.03 [Malinova, O. Yu. (2018) ‘Justifying the political course of the 2000 s and constructing the myth about "the hard nineties" in the Vladimir Putin’s discourse’ [Obosnovanie politiki 2000-kh godov v diskurse V. V. Putina i formirovanie mifa o "likhikh devyanostykh"], Politicheskaya nauka, 3, pp. 45–69. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2018.03.03 (In Russ.)].

Малинова, О. Ю. (2012) ‘Политическое использование прошлого как инструмент символической политики: эволюция дискурса властвующей элиты в постсоветской России’, ПОЛИТЭКС, 4, сс. 179–204. [Malinova, O. Yu. (2012) ‘Political Usage of the Past as a Tool of Symbolic Policy: The Evolution of a Discourse of the Governing Elite in Post-Soviet Russia’ [Politicheskoe ispol'zovanie proshlogo kak instrument simvolicheskoi politiki: evolyutsiya diskursa vlastvuyushchei elity v postsovetskoi Rossii], POLITEKS, 4, pp. 179–204. (In Russ.)].

Малинова, О. Ю. (2013) ‘Политическое использование символа Великой Отечественной войны в постсоветской России: Эволюция дискурса властвующей элиты’, Прошлый век, 1, сс. 158–186. [Malinova, O. Yu. (2013) ‘The political usage of the symbol of the Great Patriotic War in Post-Soviet Russia: Evolution of the ruling elite discourse’ [Politicheskoe ispol'zovanie simvola Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny v postsovetskoi Rossii: Evolyutsiya diskursa vlastvuyushchei elity], Proshlyi vek, 1, pp. 158–186. (In Russ.)].

Назукина, М. В., Сулимов, К. А. (2021) ‘К измерению образа будущего в дискурсе депутатов Государственной Думы (на примере территориально-политических представлений)’, Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 13 (1), сс. 1–18. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2021-1-1-18 [Nazukina, M. V., Sulimov, K. A. (2021) ‘On measuring the image of the future in the discourse of the Russian State Duma deputies (as based on territorial-political representations)’ [K izmereniyu obraza budushchego v diskurse deputatov Gosudarstvennoĭ Dumy (na primere territorial'no-politicheskikh predstavleniĭ)], Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo upravleniya), 13 (1), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2021-1-1-18 (In Russ.)]

Нестик, Т. А. (2023) ‘Влияние военных конфликтов на психологическое состояние общества: перспективные направления исследований’, Социальная психология и общество, 14 (4), сс. 5–22. DOI: 10.17759/sps.202314040 [Nestik, T. A. (2023) ‘The influence of military conflicts on the psychological state’ [Vliyanie voennykh konfliktov na psikhologicheskoe sostoyanie obshchestva: perspektivnye napravleniya issledovanii], Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, 14 (4), pp. 5–22. DOI: 10.17759/sps.202314040 (In Russ.)].

Миллер, А. И., Малинова, О. Ю., Ефременко, Д. В. (ред.) (2023) Политика памяти в России – региональное измерение: монография. РАН. ИНИОН. Москва: Институт научной информации по общественным наукам РАН, 471 с. DOI: 10.31249/B978-5-248-01053-0.2023.00.00 [Miller, A. I., Malinova, O. Yu., Efremenko, D. V. (eds.) (2023) Memory politics in Russia – regional dimension: monograph [Politika pamyati v Rossii – regional'noe izmerenie: monografiya]. RAS. INION. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences RAS, 471 p. DOI: 10.31249/B978-5-248-01053-0.2023.00.00 (In Russ.)].

Шестопал, Е. Б. (2016) ‘Образы будущего в сознании российского общества как фактор политического развития’, Вестник Московского университета. Серия 12. Политические науки, 2, сс. 7–20. [Shestopal, E. B. (2016) ‘Images of the future in Russian society as a factor in political development’ [Obrazy budushchego v soznanii rossiiskogo obshchestva kak faktor politicheskogo razvitiya], Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki, 2, pp. 7–20. (In Russ.)]

Щербинин, А. И., Щербинина, Н. Г. (2020) ‘Политическое конструирование образа будущего’, Вестник Томского государственного университета, Философия. Социология. Политология, 56, сс. 285–299. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/56/25 [Shcher-binin, A. I., Shcherbinina, N. G. (2020) ‘Political construction of the image of the future’ [Politicheskoe konstruirovanie obraza budushchego], Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 56, pp. 285–299. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/56/25 (In Russ.)].

Щербинина, Н. Г. (2010) ‘Политический образ и имидж: соотношение понятий’, Политический маркетинг, 4 (145), сс. 71–78. [Shcherbinina, N. G. (2010) ‘Politicalimage and image: correlation of concepts’[Politicheskii obraz i imidzh: sootnoshenie ponyatii], Politicheskii marketing, 4 (145), pp. 71–78. (In Russ.)].

Bourdieu, P. (1998) Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time. New York: Polity Press, 109 p.

Dunmire, P. L. (2011) Projecting the future through political discourse: the case of the Bush doctrine. John Benjamins, 218 p.

Khlevniuk, D., GN, & Noordenbos, B. (2024) ‘The temporality of memory politics: An analysis of Russian state media narratives on the war in Ukraine’, The British Journal of Sociology, pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.13171

Kwon W., Clarke I., Wodak R. (2014) ‘Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings’, Journal of management studies, 51(2), pp. 265–290. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12036

White, J. (2019) Politics of Last Resort: Governing by Emergency in the European Union. Oxford University Press. 229 p.

Wodak, R. (ed.) (2011) The discourse-historical approach Critical discourse analysis: Concepts, history, theory. Sage. pp. 63–93.

Published

2026-01-12

How to Cite

Kurbatov А. В. (2026). THE PAST AS A SYMBOLIC RESOURCE FOR IMAGINING THE FUTURE: BASED ON SPEECHES BY DEPUTIES OF THE STATE DUMA OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF THE VIII CONVOCATION. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 19(4), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-4-38-48

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies