INCREASING ACTORNESS? DYNAMICS OF THE EU'S INTERNATIONAL ROLES IN RELATIONS WITH THE PRC

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-2-143-153

Keywords:

European Union, PRC, actorness, role theory, normative power, market power, security, international relations

Abstract

Responding to the changing international environment, the European Union seeks to strengthen its actorness by rethinking its international roles within the framework of the Strategic Partnership with China. The article aims to analyze the dynamics and hierarchy of EU roles in relation to China as an effort to enhance the actorness of the integration association. Role theory is used as an analytical tool to study materials from EU–PRC summits (2003–2024): joint declarations and EU leadership statements. The novelty of the study lies in examining the EU’s actorness and its engagement with third countries through a new theoretical perspective, using China as a case. Traditionally, to assert leadership in bilateral relations with China, Brussels has applied three main roles—“normative power,” “market power,” and “security actor.” To maintain influence, the EU constructed hierarchies among these roles, but geopolitical changes and the move toward Strategic Autonomy disrupted this logic. The EU now foregrounds the role of “security actor” in relations with Beijing, adjusting its content and direction. This includes continued engagement on global issues, pressure on Russia, signaling China on Asia-Pacific policy, and ensuring EU economic security. These moves further politicize relations and reduce opportunities for multi-level dialogue within the Strategic Partnership framework.

Author Biographies

Sergey Shein, Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies (CCEIS), National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; Moscow, Russia.

PhD in politics, Associate Professor, School of International Regional Studies; Senior Research Fello

Egor Ryzhkin, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; Moscow, Russia.

Research Assistant, Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies (CCEIS)

References

Арбатова, Н. К. (2019) ‘Стратегическая автономия Европейского союза: реальность или благое пожелание?’, Полис: Политические исследования, 6, cc. 36–52, DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.06.04 [Arbatova, N. K. (2019) ‘Strategic Autonomy of the European Union: Reality or Good Intention?’ [Strategicheskaja avtonomija Evropejskogo sojuza: real'nost' ili blagoe pozhelanie?], Polis. Political Studies, 6, pp. 36–52. (In Russ.)]. EDN: WQTWUS

Кавешников, Н. Ю. (2022) ‘Заявка Украины на вступление в ЕС как импульс для переформатирования политики расширения’, Современная Европа, 6, cc. 18–34, DOI: 10.31857/S020170832206002X [Kaveshnikov, N. Yu. (2022) ‘Ukraine's Membership Application as a Trigger for Transformation of the EU’s Enlargement Policy’ [Zajavka Ukrainy na vstuplenie v ES kak impul's dlja pereformatirovanija politiki rasshirenija], Contemporary Europe, 6, pp. 18–34. (In Russ.)]. EDN: GOISFF

Кашин, В. Б. Шеин, С. А., Мельникова, Ю. Ю., Красикова, Л. В., Поташев, Н. А. (2022) Европейский союз и Китайская Народная Республика: (не) стратегическое партнёрство? [электронное издание]. Доступно: https://russian¬council.ru/papers/RIAC-EU-China-WorkingPaper65ru.pdf?ysclid=m2otrtpvpj617373095 (Дата обращения: 17.09.2024) [Kashin, V. B., Shein, S. A., Melnikova, Yu. Yu., Krasikova, L. V., Potashev, N. A. (2022) European Union and People’s Republic of China: (non-) strategic partnership? [Evropejskij sojuz i Kitajskaja Narodnaja Respublika: (ne) strategicheskoe partnjorstvo?] [online]. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/papers/RIAC-EU-China-WorkingPaper65ru.pdf?ysclid=m2otrtpvpj617373095 (Accessed: 17 September 2024)].

Коцур, Г. В. (2023) ‘Деконтестация концептов «суверенитет» и «стратегический суверенитет» в официальных дискурсах России и Европейского союза’, Полис: Политические исследования, 4, cc. 23–36, DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.04.03 [Kotsur, G. V. (2023) ‘Decontestation of the concepts of sovereignty and strategic sovereignty in the official discourses of Russia and the EU (2016-2021)’ [Dekontestacija konceptov “suverenitet” i “strategicheskij suverenitet” v oficial'nyh diskursah Rossii i Evropejskogo sojuza, 2016-2021 gg.], Polis. Political Studies, 4, pp. 23–36. (In Russ.)]. EDN: BIZGDV

Лебедева, М. М. (2013) ‘Акторы современной мировой политики: тренды развития’, Вестник МГИМО-Университета, 1, cc. 38–42, DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2013-1-28-38-42 [Lebedeva, M.M. (2013) ‘Actors of Contemporary World Politics: Trends of Development’ [Aktory sovremennoj mirovoj politiki: trendy razvitija], MGIMO Review of International Relations, 1, pp. 38–42. (In Russ.)].

Романова, Т. А. (2021) ‘Дискурс о суверенитете Европейского союза: содержание и последствия’, Современная Европа, 5, cc. 32–44, DOI: 10.15211/soveurope520213244 [Romanova, T. A. (2021) ‘The EU’s Discourse on Sovereignty: Content and Consequences’ [Diskurs o suverenitete Evropejskogo sojuza: soderzhanie i posledstvija], Contemporary Europe, 5, pp. 32–44. (In Russ.)]. EDN: VXAWOX

Романова, Т. А. (2024) ‘На разных языках 2.0’, Россия в глобальной политике, 1, cc. 178–195, DOI:10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-1-178-195 [Romanova, T.A. (2024) ‘In Different Languages 2.0’ [Na raznyh jazykah 2.0], Russia in Global Affairs, 1, pp. 178–195. (In Russ.)]. EDN: QIATNJ

Романова, Т. А., Павлова, Е. В. (2013) ‘Россия и страны Евросоюза: партнёрство для модернизации’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 8, cc. 54–61, DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2013-8-54-61 [Romanova, Т. А., Pavlova, E. V. (2013) ‘Russia and EU Countries: Partnership for Modernization’ [Rossija i strany Evrosojuza: Partnerstvo dlja modernizacii], World Economy and International Relations, 8, pp. 54–61. (In Russ.)].

Aggestam, L., Johansson, M. (2017) ‘The leadership paradox in EU foreign policy’, Journal of common market studies, 55 (6), pp. 1203–1220, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12558.

Altunişik, M. B. (2008) ‘EU Foreign Policy and the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: How much of an Actor?’, European Security, 17 (1), pp. 105–121, DOI: 10.1080/09662830802503763.

Batzella, F. (2022) ‘Engaged but constrained. Assessing EU actorness in the case of Nord Stream 2’, Journal of European Integration, 4 (6), pp. 821–835, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2022.2043853. EDN: UODNOH

Bengtsson, R., Elgström, O. (2012) ‘Conflicting role conceptions? The European Union in global politics’, Foreign policy analysis, 8 (1), pp. 93–108, DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00157.x. EDN: USUYOD

Biscop, S. (2005) The European Security Strategy and the Neighbourhood Policy: A New Starting Point for a Euro-Mediterranean Security Partnership? [online]. Available at: https://www.egmontinstitute.be/app/uploads/2014/01/EUSA_ESS_EMP_Biscop.htm (Accessed: 11 July 2024).

Borrell, J. F. (2024). Europe between Two Wars – EU Foreign Policy in 2023. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Chen, X., Gao, X. (2022) ‘Analysing the EU’s collective securitisation moves towards China’, Asia Europe Journal, 20 (2), pp. 195–216, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2023.2183394. EDN: KNOYTV

Costa, O., Barbé, E. (2023) ‘A moving target. EU actorness and the Russian invasion of Ukraine’, Journal of European Integration, 45 (3), pp. 431–446, DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00640-4. EDN: STZLIH

Damro, C. (2012) ‘Market power Europe’, Journal of European public policy, 19 (5), pp. 682–699, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2011.646779.

Damro, C., Friedman, Y. (2018) ‘Market power Europe and the externalization of higher education’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56 (6), pp. 1394–1410, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12749.

Drieskens, E. (2017) ‘Golden or gilded jubilee? A research agenda for actorness’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24 (10), pp. 1534–1546, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1225784. EDN: YEAXVB

Dryburgh, L. (2008) ‘The EU as a Global Actor? EU Policy Towards Iran’, European Security, 17 (2-3), pp. 253–271, DOI:10.1080/09662830802481549.

Elgström, O., Smith, M. (2006) The European Union's roles in international politics. London: Taylor & Francis Limited.

Gehring, T., Urbanski, K., Oberthür, S. (2017) ‘The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55 (4), pp. 727–743, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12530. EDN: YDXOEP

Gurol, J., Starkmann, A. (2020) ‘New Partners for the Planet? The European Union and China in International Climate Governance from a Role-Theoretical Perspective’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59, pp. 518–534, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13098. EDN: SBUMFY

Helwig, N. (2023) ‘EU Strategic Autonomy after the Russian Invasion of Ukraine: Europe's Capacity to Act in Times of War’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61 (S1), pp. 57–67, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13527. EDN: TYHQJG

Hoffmann, N., Niemann, A. (2017) ‘EU actorness and the European Neighbourhood Policy’ In: Schumacher, T., Marchetti, A., Demmelhuber T. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy. UK: Routledge, pp. 28–38.

Holsti, K. J. (1970) ‘National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 14, pp. 233–309, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3013584.

Jupille, J., Caporaso, J.A. (1998) ‘States, agency and rules: The European Union in global environmental politics’ in: Rhodes, C. (ed.) The European Union in the World Community. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 213–229.

Klose, S. (2018) ‘Theorizing the EU's actorness: Towards an interactionist role theory framework’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56 (5), pp. 1144–1160, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12725.

Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’, Journal of common market studies, 40 (2), pp. 235–258, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00353.

Mattlin, M. (2012) ‘Dead on arrival: normative EU policy towards China’, Asia Europe Journal, 10, pp. 181–198, DOI: 10.1007/s10308-012-0321-7. EDN: EOMWAJ

McCourt, D. M. (2014) Britain and World Power since 1945: Constructing a nation's role in international politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Michalski, A., Pan, Zh. (2016) ‘Role Dynamics in a Structured Relationship: The EU–China Strategic Partnership’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55 (3), pp. 611–627, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12505. EDN: TKZQEX

Michalski, A., Parker, C. F. (2024) ‘The EU’s evolving leadership role in an age of geopolitics: Beyond normative and market power in the Indo-Pacific’, European Journal of International Security, 9 (2), pp. 263–280, DOI: 10.1017/eis.2023.34.

Parker, O., Rosamond, B. (2013) ‘‘Normative power Europe’ meets economic liberalism: Complicating cosmopolitanism inside/outside the EU’, Cooperation and Conflict, 48 (2), pp. 229–246, DOI: 10.1177/0010836713485388.

Persson, A. (2018) ‘‘EU differentiation’ as a case of ‘Normative Power Europe’(NPE) in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict’, Journal of European Integration, 40 (2), pp. 193–208, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1418867.

Przychodniak, M. (2023) EU-China Summit Ends with Protocol of Divergences [online]. Available at: https://www.pism.pl/publications/eu-china-summit-ends-with-protocol-of-divergences (Accessed: 11.07.2024).

Rieker, P., Giske, M. T. E. (2024) ‘Actorness, Differentiated Integration, and EU(rope)’s Role in the World’ in: Rieker, P., Giske, M. T. E. (eds.) European Actorness in a Shifting Geopolitical Order. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–62.

Rühlig, T. (2020) Towards a more principled European China Policy? Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule of Law in EU-China Relations [online]. Available at: https://www.ifri.org/en/studies/towards-more-principled-european-china-policy (Accessed: 11 July 2024).

Sjöstedt, G. (1977) The External Role of the European Community. Westmead, Hampshire: Saxon House.

Thym, D. (2004) ‘Reforming Europe’s Common Foreign and Security Policy’, European Law Journal, 10 (1), pp. 5–22, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00200.x. EDN: EVDPGD

Yuan, H., Orbie, J. (2015) ‘The Social Dimension of the EU-China Relationship: A Normative and Pragmatic European Approach?’, European Foreing Affaris Review, 20 (3), pp. 337–354, DOI: 10.54648/eerr2015031.

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Shein С. А., & Ryzhkin Е. Н. (2025). INCREASING ACTORNESS? DYNAMICS OF THE EU’S INTERNATIONAL ROLES IN RELATIONS WITH THE PRC. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 19(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-2-143-153