DISCURSIVE MODELS OF POST-SOVIET NATION-BUILDING: RUSSIA, KAZAKHSTAN, BELARUS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-2-36-47

Keywords:

nation-building, identity politics, official discourse, nation, people, Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus

Abstract

The paper analyzes the conceptual and terminological foundations of official nation-building discourses in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus. It highlights key words and categories of these discourses, identifying the main vectors of nation-building discourse according to the “top-down” model. The research is based on a large amount of empirical material and follows a constructivist methodology, assuming that ruling elites play a decisive role in forming a nation and its “portfolio” of identities. The database is primarily based on an analysis of official documents defining nation-building in the countries. The empirical material is presented in the form of tables containing discursive series on nation-building policy. Results show that the official discourse formed in the three states is based, firstly, on the legacy of the Soviet national policy with an assessment of polyethnicity as an advantage; secondly, on the assertion of the immutable nature of independence; thirdly, on the developed civil discourse formed by the “core” concepts of “nation” and “people”. The appeal to ethnicity in three countries is examined, including the ethnic dimension of nation-building discourse. Kazakhstan and Belarus focus on the languages of ethnic majorities, while Russia focuses on the neo-imperial concept of Russianness. The civilizational vector of nation-building discourse is shared among countries but its meaning varies

Author Biographies

Viktor Avksentyev, Federal Research Center Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Chief Researcher

Boris Aksyumov, Federal Research Center Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, North Caucasus Federal University, Russia

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

Dmitry Uznarodov, Federal Research Center Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia.

Candidate of Political Sciences, Senior Researcher

References

Алимджанов, А. А. (2023) ‘Понятие “независимость” в официальных выступлениях глав государств Центральной Азии’, Полис. Политические исследования, 3, сс. 70–85. [Alimdzhanov, A. A. (2023) ‘The notion of “Independence” in the official speeches of Central Asia presidents’ [Ponyatie “nezavisimost'” v oficial'nyh vystupleniyah glav gosudarstv Central'noj Azii], Polis. Political Studies, 3, pp. 70–85. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.03.06 (In Russ.)]. EDN: IVCKXX

Антанович, Н. А. (2024) ‘Билингвизм в языковой политике: политологические аспекты исследования (на примере Республики Беларусь)’, Вестник университета (Российско-Таджикский (Славянский) университет), 3, сс. 44–55. [Antanovich, N. A. (2024) ‘Bilinguism in language politics: politological aspects of research (on the example of the Republic of Belarus)’ [Bilingvizm v yazykovoj politike: politologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya (na primere Respubliki Belarus')], University Bulletin (Russian-Tajik (Slavonic) University), 3, pp. 44–55. (In Russ.)].

Бектурганова, Б. И. (2019) ‘Гражданская и этническая идентификации региональной молодежи Республики Казахстан’, Siberian Socium, 2, сс. 8–17. [Bekturganova, B. I. (2019) ‘Civil and Ethnic identification of regional youth of the Republic of Kazakhstan’ [Grazhdanskaya i etnicheskaya identifikacii regional'noj molodezhi Respubliki Kazahstan], Siberian Socium, 2, pp. 8–17. https://doi.org/ 10.21684/2587-8484-2019-3-2-8-17 (In Russ.)]. EDN: FXLNDF

Буев, А. Л., Буховец, О. Г. (2018) ‘Государственный билингвизм. положение русских и русскоязычие в Республике Беларусь’, Современная Европа, 3 (82), сс. 71–82. [Buev, A. L., Bukhovec, O. G. (2018) ‘State bilingualism. Conditions of Russians and Russian-speaking in the Republic of Belarus’ [Gosudarstvennyj bilingvizm. polozhenie russkih i russkoyazychie v Respublike Belarus'], Contemporary Europe, 3, pp. 71–82. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope320187182 (In Russ.)]. EDN: FAMKBW

Кабазиев, М. Ш. (2022) ‘Формирование национальной идентичности Республики Казахстан: особенности и противоречия’, Современная Европа, 7, сс. 221–231. [Kabaziev, M. Sh. (2022) ‘Formation of the national identity of the Republic of Kazakhstan: peculiarities and contradictions’ [Formirovanie nacional'noj identichnosti Respubliki Kazahstan: osobennosti i protivorechiya], Contemporary Europe, 7, pp. 221–231. https://doi.org/ 10.31857/S020170832207018X (In Russ.)]. EDN: KXUBGR

Крючек, П. С., Ракачев, В. Н., Ракачева, Я. В., Сергеев, В. Н., Острога, В. А. (2024) ‘Историческая память и национальная идентичность белорусов и россиян: опыт историко-социологического исследования’, Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. История, 2, сс. 5–16. [Kruchek, P. S., Rakachev, V. N., Rakacheva, YA. V., Sergeev, V. N., Astroga, V. A. (2024) ‘Historical memory and national identity of Belarusians and Russians: experience of historical and sociological research’ [Istoricheskaya pamyat' i nacional'naya identichnost' belorusov i rossiyan: opyt istoriko-sociolo¬gicheskogo issledovaniya], Journal of the Belarusian State University. History, 2, pp. 5–16. (In Russ.)].

Пантин, В. И., Лапкин, В. В. (2015) ‘Этнополитические и этносоциальные процессы на постсоветском пространстве (на примере России, Белоруссии, Казахстана и Украины)’, Полис. Политические исследования, 5, сс. 75–93. [Pantin, V. I., Lapkin, V. V. (2015) ‘Ethnopolitical and ethnosocial processes in Post-Soviet countries (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine cases)’ [Etnopoliticheskie i etnosocial'nye processy na postsovetskom prostranstve (na primere Rossii, Belorussii, Kazahstana i Ukrainy)], Polis. Political Studies, 5, pp. 75–93. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.05.07. (In Russ.)]. EDN: UJYYWP

Семененко, И. C. (2024) ‘Цивилизационная идентичность в повестке политики идентичности: меняющийся миропорядок и российские приоритеты’, Государственное управление. Электронный вестник, 104(S), сс. 79–87. [Semenenko, I. S. (2024) ‘Civilizational identity and the identity politics agenda: Russian priorities in a transforming world order’ [Civilizacionnaya identichnost' v povestke politiki identichnosti: menyayushchijsya miroporyadok i rossijskie prioritety], E-Journal public administration, 104(S), pp. 79–87. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-104(S)-2024-79-87 (In Russ.)]. EDN: GOQHRO

Семененко, И. С., Лапкин, В. В., Бардин, А. Л., Пантин, В. И. (2017) ‘Между государством и нацией: дилеммы политики идентичности на постсоветском пространстве’, Полис. Политические исследования, 5, сс. 54–78. [Semenenko, I. S., Lapkin, V. V., Bardin, A. L., Pantin, V. I. (2017) ‘Between the State and the Nation: dilemmas of identity politics in post-Soviet societies’ [Mezhdu gosudarstvom i naciej: dilemmy politiki identichnosti na postsovetskom prostranstve], Polis. Political Studies, 5, pp. 54–78. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.05.05 (In Russ.)]. EDN: ZGSQIV

Тишков, В. А. (2018) ‘Концептуальная динамика этнополитики в России (от Горбачева до Путина)’, Вестник Российской нации, 6, сс. 9–30. [Tishkov, V. A. (2018) ‘Conceptual dynamics of ethnopolitics in Russia (from Gorbachev to Putin)’ [Konceptual'naya dinamika etnopolitiki v Rossii (ot Gorbacheva do Putina)], Vestnik Rossijskoj nacii, 6, pp. 9–30. (In Russ.)].

Шимов, В. В. (2023) ‘Белоруссия и Украина: две модели национального строительства’, Труды Института постсоветских и межрегиональных исследований, 6, сс. 272–282. [Shimov, V. V. (2023) ‘Belarus and Ukraine: two models of national building’ [Belorussiya i Ukraina: dve modeli nacional'nogo stroitel'stva], The institute of Post-Soviet and interregional studies, 6, pp. 272–282. (In Russ.)]. EDN: DZVTAB

Bassin, M. (2012) ‘National Metanarratives after Communism: An Introduction’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 53 (5), pp. 553–556. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.53.5.553 EDN: WQXUEJ

Blakkisrud, H. (2023) ‘Russkii as the New Rossiiskii? Nation-Building in Russia After 1991’, Nationalities Papers, 51 (1), pp. 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2022.11 EDN: SXWLIL

Brubaker, R. (2004) Ethncitiy without Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/9780674258143

Brubaker, R. (2011) ‘Nationalizing states revisited: projects and processes of nationalization in post-Soviet states’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34 (11), pp. 1785–1814, https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.579137 EDN: WQXHFV

Davenel, Y.-M., Yim, E. (2016) ‘Minority Assimilation and Nation-Building in Kazakhstan’ In: R. Isaacs and A. Polese (eds.) Nation-Building and Identity in the Post-Soviet Space: New Tools and Approaches. Routledge, pp. 46–64.

Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London; New York: Longman.

Fierman, W. (2009) ‘Identity, symbolism and the po¬litics of identity in Central Asia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 61 (7), pp. 1207–1228 https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130903068731

Isaacs, R. and Polese, A. (2016) ‘Introduction: Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet Space: Old, New and Changing Tools’ In: R. Isaacs and A. Polese (eds.) Nation-Building and Identity in the Post-Soviet Space: New Tools and Approaches. Routledge, pp. 1–23.

Kivelson, V., Suny, R. (2017) Russia’s Empires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kolstø, P. (2016) ‘The Ethnification of Russian Nationalism’ In: P. Kolstø, H. Blakkisrud (eds.) The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity, Authoritarianism, 2000–2015. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 18–45.

Linde, F. (2016) ‘The Civilizational Turn in Russian Political Discourse: From Pan‐Europeanism to Civilizational Distinctiveness’, The Russian Review, 75 (4), pp. 604–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/russ.12105 EDN: PGBYJT

Marin, A. (2020) ‘Belarusian Nationalism in the 2010s: a Case of Anti-Colonialism? Origins, Features and Outcomes of Ongoing «Soft Belarusianisation»’, The Journal of Belarusian Studies, 9 (1), pp. 27–50. https://doi.org/10.30965/20526512-12340003 EDN: UZIIOE

Marples, D. R. (2007) ‘Elections and Nation-Building in Belarus: A Comment on Ioffe’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 48 (1), pp. 59–67. https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.48.1.59

O’Beachain, D., Kevlihan, R. (2013) ‘Threading a needle: Kazakhstan between civic and ethno-nationalist state-building’, Nations and Nationalism, 19 (2), pp. 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12022

Rutland, P. (2023) ‘Thirty Years of Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet States’, Nationalities Papers, 51 (1), pp. 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.94 EDN: FNSWLJ

Shevel, O. (2011) ‘Russian Nation-building from Yel’tsin to Medvedev: Ethnic, Civic or Purposefully Ambiguous?’, Europe-Asia studies, 63 (2), pp. 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.547693 EDN: OMQSEF

Teper, Yu. (2016) ‘Official Russian Identity Discourse in the Light of the Annexation of Crimea: National or Imperial?’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 32 (4), pp. 378–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1076959 EDN: WNQDJB

Verkhovskii, A., Pain, E. (2012) ‘Civilizational Nationalism’, Russian Politics and Law, 50 (5), pp. 52–86. https://doi.org/10.2753/RUP1061-1940500503 EDN: PNMWAA

Woolhiser, C. (2014) ‘The Russian Language in Bela¬rus: Language Use, Speaker Identities and Metalinguistic Discourse’ In: L. Ryazanova-Clarke (eds.) The Russian Language Outside the Nation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Uni¬versity Press, pp. 81–116. EDN: XOTHNN

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Avksentyev В. А., Aksyumov Б. В., & Uznarodov Д. И. (2025). DISCURSIVE MODELS OF POST-SOVIET NATION-BUILDING: RUSSIA, KAZAKHSTAN, BELARUS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 19(2), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-2-36-47

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies