A comprehensive analysis of the stone equipment of the Chernushka site (excavation II, 2003)

Authors

  • E.L. Lychagina Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
  • G.N. Poplevko Institute of History of Material Culture of Russian Academy of Sciences
  • T.A. Tsygvintseva Udmurt State University

Keywords:

archaeology, complex analysis, typological analysis, technological analysis, trasological analysis, the Kama Neolithic culture, stone equipment

Abstract

The Chernushka site is located on the edge of a floodplain terrace on the left bank of the Kama river,14 metresabove the nowadays shoreline in the Chernushka village inPermregion (the Middle Urals). The complex related to theKamaNeolithic culture was revealed in the settlement during the research in 2003. The construction of large dwellings of earth-house-type of square form, ceramics ornamented with comb stamp, tools from tabular flint with bifacial processing were typical for theKamaNeolithic culture. Two radiocarbon dates have been obtained in calibration values at the Chernushka site that allows to date it back to the V millennium B.C. Quartz and flinty pebble, milk and gray flint were raw materials for stone items. Preforms for tools were prepared mainly by indirect percussion knapping and pressure knapping. Primary flakes were received by chipping with soft hammer and hammerstone. One nucleus was cone-shaped with negatives from shear blades, made by counterattack, blade knapping around. The edge of the platform was framed by abrasion and reduction. Tools made on small and medium blades dominate in the collection. Very few tools on blade-flakes and core-like chips were found at the site. As a result, two complexes of local economic are distinguished in the site: 1) processing of the products of hunting and fishing; 2) wood processing. Fixed technology is not typical for theKamaNeolithic culture which can be explained by several reasons: 1) the excavated materials present another archaeological culture (the Kama Mesolithic culture or the Volga-Kama Neolithic culture), and 2) the place was used for cutting production, in which blade-inserts played the leading role.

Author Biographies

E.L. Lychagina, Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University

Candidate of Science in History, Associate Professor, Department of Ancient and Medieval History of Russia, Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University (Russia)

G.N. Poplevko, Institute of History of Material Culture of Russian Academy of Sciences

Candidate of Science in History, Senior Research Fellow, Institute of History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia)

T.A. Tsygvintseva, Udmurt State University

Candidate of Science in History, Senior Research Fellow, Institute of History and Culture of Peoples of the Urals, Udmurt State University (Russia)

References

Библиографический список

Бадер О.Н. Уральский неолит // Каменный век на территории СССР. М., 1970. С.157–171.

Бадер О.Н. Хронологические рамки неолита Прикамья и методы их установления // КСИА. 1978. Вып.153. С.72–74.

Гиря Е.Ю. Технологический анализ каменных индустрий. СПб., 1997. 198 с.

Коробкова Г.Ф. Хозяйственные комплексы ранних земледельческо-скотоводческих обществ юга СССР. Л., 1987. 320 с.

Лычагина Е.Л. Комплекс керамики с тальком поселения Чернушка // Оборинские чтения: матер. регион. конф. Пермь. 2006. Вып 4. С. 25–28.

Лычагина Е.Л. О хронологии и периодизации неолита Верхнего и Среднего Прикамья // Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии. 2011. №1. С. 28–33.

Лычагина Е.Л., Поплевко Г.Н. Возможности комплексного анализа каменного инвентаря (на примере раскопа VI стоянки Хуторская) // Вестник археологии, антропологии и этно-графии. 2011. № 1. С. 4–10.

Лычагина Е.Л., Поплевко Г.Н. Комплексный анализ каменного инвентаря неолитической стоянки Чашкинское Озеро IV // Зап. ИИМК РАН. СПб., 2012. Вып. 7. С. 16–30.

Лычагина Е.Л., Цыгвинцева Т.А. Сравнительный анализ ранненеолитических культур Прикамья // Вестник Пермского университета. Сер. История. 2013. Вып. 1 (21). С.22–36.

Мокрушин В.П., Лычагина Е.Л. Новые исследования поселения Чернушка // Тр. КАЭЭ. 2003. Вып. 3. С. 31–40.

Поплевко Г.Н. Методика комплексного исследования каменных индустрий // Труды ИИМК РАН. СПб., 2007. Т. 23. 388 с.

References

Bader O.N. Ural'skiy neolit // Kamennyy vek na territorii SSSR. M., 1970. S.157–171.

Bader O.N. Khronologicheskie ramki neolita Prikam'ya i metody ikh ustanovleniya // KSIA. 1978. Vyp.153. S.72–74.

Girya E.Yu. Tekhnologicheskiy analiz kamennykh industriy. SPb., 1997. 198 s.

Korobkova G.F. Khozyaystvennye kompleksy rannikh zemledel'chesko-skotovodcheskikh obshchestv yuga SSSR. L., 1987. 320 s.

Lychagina E.L. Kompleks keramiki s tal'kom poseleniya Chernushka // Oborinskie chteniya. Mater. region. konf. Perm'. 2006. Vyp 4. S. 25–28.

Lychagina E.L. O khronologii i periodizatsii neolita Verkhnego i Srednego Prikam'ya // Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii. 2011. №1. S. 28–33.

Lychagina E.L., Poplevko G.N. Vozmozhnosti kompleksnogo analiza kamennogo inventarya (na primere raskopa VI stoyanki Khutorskaya) // Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii. 2011. № 1. S. 4–10.

Lychagina E.L., Poplevko G.N. Kompleksnyy analiz kamennogo inventarya neoliticheskoy stoyan-ki Chashkinskoe Ozero IV // Zap. IIMK RAN. SPb., 2012. Vyp. 7. S. 16–30.

Lychagina E.L., Tsygvintseva T.A. Sravnitel'nyy analiz ranneneoliticheskikh kul'tur Prikam'ya // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya Istoriya. 2013. Vyp. 1 (21). S.22–36.

Mokrushin V.P., Lychagina E.L. Novye issledovaniya poseleniya Chernushka // Tr. KAEE. 2003. Vyp. 3. S. 31–40.

Poplevko G.N. Metodika kompleksnogo issledovaniya kamennykh industriy // Trudy IIMK RAN. SPb., 2007. T. 23. 388 s.

Published

2020-08-05

How to Cite

Lychagina, E., Poplevko, G., & Tsygvintseva, T. (2020). A comprehensive analysis of the stone equipment of the Chernushka site (excavation II, 2003). PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 24(1), 15–27. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/3559