LEGISLATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES OF RUSSIAN REGIONS IN THE FEDERAL PARLIAMENT: POLITICAL-STRATEGIC EFFECTIVENESS OR ISSUE-RELATED APPROACH?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-111-127

Keywords:

regional environmental legislation, symbolic environmental legislation, subjects with the right of legislative initiative, State Duma, symbolic politics, issue-related approach, political-strategic effectiveness, Russian regions

Abstract

Regional legislatures are one of the subjects with the right of legislative initiative in the Russian Federation, which gives them the right to submit bills to the State Duma. Regions can use such a mechanism of multi-level interaction for different purposes. Faced with difficulties in solving their own specific environmental problems, they can use it to symbolically draw attention to themselves, fulfil personal ambitions, demonstrate competence, etc., without having the goal of adopting the submitted bill. Thus, regions can use two main strategies, focusing on political-strategic effectiveness or the issue-based approach. This study aims to identify the factors that allow us to distinguish these strategic variations. For the empirical analysis, we use data on federal legislative initiatives from 2004 to 2022. We have operationalised three key factors that possibly can influence the differentiation of regional strategies: ecological, administrative/managerial, and political. Through correlation analysis, we have shown that the combination of strategies can be different in each specific region. It largely depends on the calculation of the benefits and costs of using this tool, and that the symbolic strategy plays a rather auxiliary role in achieving goals. We construct matrices of regions that are more likely to use one or another strategy as a result of combining the above factors.

Author Biographies

Konstantin Sulimov, Perm State University

Candidate of Sc. (Polit. Sc.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Political Science,

Christina Turtseva, Perm State University

assistant of the Department of Political Science, junior research fellow of the Department of Political Science

References

Барбашова, Н. В. (2020) ‘Проблемы правового регулирования экологических отношений в субъектах Российской Федерации’, Электронное приложение к Российскому юридическому журналу, 6, сс. 76‒84. [Barbashova, N. V. (2020) ‘Problems of legal regulation of environmantal relations in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation’ [Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya ekologicheskikh otnoshenii v sub"ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii], Electronic supplement to Russian Judical Journal, 6, pp. 76–84. (In Russ.)].

Бедерсон, В., Шевцова, И. (2021) ‘Застройщики, партия власти и немного конкуренции в российских миллионниках: типология городских режимов в 2010-е гг. ’, Журнал исследований социальной политики, 19 (2), cc. 285–300. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-2-285-300. [Bederson, V., Shevtsova, I. (2021) ‘Developers, the party of power and a bitoff competition in Russia’s million-plus cities:a typology of urban regimes in the 2010s’ [Zastroishchiki, partiya vlasti i nemnogo konkurentsii v rossiiskikh millionnikakh: tipologiya gorodskikh rezhimov v 2010-e gg.], The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 19 (2), pp. 285–300. (In Russ.)].

Глебова, И. И. (2004) ‘Партия Власти’, Полис. Политические исследования, 2, cc. 85–92. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.02.09 [Glebova, I. I. (2004) ‘The party of power’ [Partiya Vlasti], Journal “POLIC”. “Political Studies”, 2, pp. 85–92. (In Russ.)].

Голосов, Г. В., Лихтенштейн, А. В. (2001) ‘«Партии власти» и российский институциональный дизайн: теоретический анализ’, Полис. Политические исследования, 1, cc. 6–14. [Golosov, G. V., Likhtenshtein, A. V. (2001) ‘ The "power parties" and the Russian institutional design: theoretical analysis’ [«Partii vlasti» i rossiiskii institutsional'nyi dizain: teoreticheskii analiz], Journal “POLIC”. “Political Studies”, 1, pp. 6–14. (In Russ.)].

Колесников, Е. В., Пажетных, Д. В. (2012) ‘Взаимодействие Государственной думы и Совета Федерации в законодательном процессе’, Современное право, 3, cc. 32–28. [Kolesnikov, E. V., Pazhetnykh, D. V. (2012) ‘Interaction between the State Duma and the Federation Council in the legislative process’ [Vzaimodeistvie Gosudarstvennoi dumy i Soveta Federatsii v zakonodatel'nom protsesse], Modern law, 3, pp. 32–28. (In Russ.)].

Кынев, А. В. (2017) ‘Государственная Дума РФ VII созыва: между «спящим потенциалом» и партийной дисциплиной’, Журнал политической философии и социологии политики «Полития. Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз», 4 (87), cc. 65–81. [Kynev, A. V. (2017) State Duma of the Russian Federation of the VII convocation: between “sleeping potential” and party dicipline [Gosudarstvennaya Duma RF VII sozyva: mezhdu «spyashchim potentsialom» i partiinoi distsiplinoi], Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia,4 (87), pp. 65–1. (In Russ.)].

Макаренко, Б. И. (2011) ‘Постсоветская партия власти: «Единая Россия» в сравнительном контексте’, Полис. Политические исследования, 1, cc. 42–65. [Makarenko, B. I. (2011) Post-soviet party of power: the «United Russia» in a comparative context [Postsovetskaya partiya vlasti: «Edinaya Rossiya» v sravnitel'nom kontekste], Journal “POLIC”. “Political Studies”, 1, pp. 42–65. (In Russ.)].

Малинова О. Ю. (2010) ‘Конструирование макрополитической идентичности в постсоветской России: символическая политика в трансформирующейся публичной сфере’, Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС, 6 (1), сс. 5-28. [Malinova O. Yu. (2010) ‘Constructing of macro-political identity in post-soviet Russia: symbolic politics in a transforming public sphere’ [Konstruirovanie makropoliticheskoi identichnosti v postsovetskoi Rossii: simvolicheskaya politika v transformiruyushcheisya publichnoi sfere], "Political expertise: POLITEX", 6 (1), pp. 5–28. (In Russ.)].

Мухаметов, Р. (2015) ‘Роль партии «Единая Россия» в консолидации элит на муниципальном уровне’, Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 1, cc. 85–94. [Mukhametov, R. (2015) ‘The role of the party “United Russia” in the consolidation of elites at the municipal level’ [Rol' partii «Edinaya Rossiya» v konsolidatsii elit na munitsipal'nom urovne], Ars Administrandi, 1, pp. 85–94. (In Russ.)].

Небоженко, А. В. (2023) ‘Феномен символического законодательства в экологической политике’ в: СОВА МИНЕРВЫ: Ежегодный сборник научных работ студентов и аспирантов Института философии и социально-политических наук Южного федерального университета / Под общ. ред. Е. В. Сердюковой, Т. С. Киенко. Ростов-н-Д: Изд-во ЮФУ, сс. 51–65. [Nebozhenko, A. V. (2023) ‘The phenomenon of symbolic legislation in environmental policy’ [Fenomen simvolicheskogo zakonodatel'stva v ekologicheskoi politike], SOVA MINERVY: Ezhegodnyi sbornik nauchnykh rabot studentov i aspirantov Instituta filosofii i sotsial'no-politicheskikh nauk Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta / Pod obshch. red. E. V. Serdyukovoi, T. S. Kienko. Rostov-n-D: Izd-vo YuFUpp. 51-65. (In Russ.)].

Нисневич, Ю. А. (2021) ‘Российская «партия власти» vs доминантная партия’, Журнал политической философии и социологии политики «Полития. Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз», 4, cc. 183–199. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2021-103-4-183-199. [Nisnevich, Yu. A. (2021) ‘Russian “party of power” vs dominant party’ [Rossiiskaya «partiya vlasti» vs dominantnaya partiya], Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia, 4, pp. 183–199. (In Russ.)].

Сулакшин, С. С., Гаганов, А. А. (2015) Постсоветский российский парламентаризм взглядом аналитика. Труды Центра научной политической мысли и идеологии. Вып. № 13. М.: Наука и политика, 48 с. [Sulakshin, S. S., Gaganov, A. A. (2015) Post-Soviet Russian Parliamentarism through an Analyst's Eye [Postsovetskii rossiiskii parlamentarizm vzglyadom analitika], Trudy Tsentra nauchnoi politicheskoi mysli i ideologii. Vyp. № 13. M.: Nauka i politika, 48 p. (In Russ.)].

Смирнов, Д. Г. (2016) ‘Символическая политика: теоретические и методологические аспекты’, Вестник ИвГУ. Серия: Гуманитарные науки, 2, сс. 5–16. [Smirnov, D. G. (2016) Symbolic politics: theoretical and methodological aspects [Simvolicheskaya politika: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie aspekty], Vestnik IvGU. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2, pp. 5-16. (In Russ.)].

Состояние российской системы управления окружающей средой: Пути ее модернизации (2009) Всемирный Банк, Департамент Устойчивого Развития. [The State of the Russian Environmental Management System: Ways to Modernize It [Sostoyanie rossiiskoi sistemy upravleniya okruzhayushchei sredoi: Puti ee modernizatsii] (2009) Vsemirnyi Bank, Departament Ustoichivogo Razvitiya. (In Russ.)].

Сулимов, К. А. (2020) ‘Оспаривание vs коррекция: динамика активности российских регионов в использовании обращений в Конституционный суд и законодательной инициативы на федеральном уровне’, Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 12 (4), cc. 556–576. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2020-4-556-576. [Sulimov, K. A. (2020) ‘Lawsuit VS amendment Russian regions activity dynamics using constitutional court appeals and legislative initiatives in federal level’ [Osparivanie vs korrektsiya: dinamika aktivnosti rossiiskikh regionov v ispol'zovanii obrashchenii v Konstitutsionnyi sud i zakonodatel'noi initsiativy na federal'nom urovne], Ars Administrandi, 12 (4), pp. 556–576. (In Russ.)].

Сулимов, К. А. (2022) ‘Регионализм как драйвер активности европейских регионов в отношениях с центром’, Полис. Политические исследования, 6, cc. 38–54. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.06.04. [Sulimov, K. A. (2022) ‘Regionalism as a driver of European regions’ activity in their relations with national authorities’ [Regionalizm kak draiver aktivnosti evropeiskikh regionov v otnosheniyakh s tsentrom], Journal “POLIC”. “Political Studies”, 6, pp. 38–54. (In Russ.)].

Сулимов, К. А. (2022) ‘Партия власти и системная оппозиция в Государственной Думе: различия в структуре территориального образа России’, Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 14 (4), cc. 589–606. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2022-4-589-606 [Sulimov, K. A. (2022) ‘Party of power and systemic opposition in the State. Duma: Differences in the structure of Russia's territorial image’ [Partiya vlasti i sistemnaya oppozitsiya v Gosudarstvennoi Dume: razlichiya v strukture territorial'nogo obraza Rossii], Ars Administrandi, 14 (4), pp. 589–606. (In Russ.)].

Щербак, А. Н., Смирнова, Д. О., Озернова, Е. П., Лепешко, Е. В., Купка, А. П., Калинин, А. Н. (2017) ‘Холодильник vs. телевизор? Экономическое голосование на выборах в Государственную думу РФ 2016 г.’, Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Политология, 3, cc. 137–155. [Shcherbak A. N., Smirnova D. O., Ozernova E. P., Lepeshko E. V., Kupka A. P., Kalinin A. N. (2017) ‘Fridge vs. TV: economic voting in the 2016 Duma elections in Russia’ [Kholodil'nik vs. televizor? Ekonomicheskoe golosovanie na vyborakh v Gosudarstvennuyu dumu RF 2016 g], “Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science”, 3, pp. 137–155. (In Russ.)].

Behnke, N, Mueller, S. (2017) ‘The purpose of intergovernmental councils: A framework for analysis and comparison’, Regional and Federal Studies, 27 (5), pp. 507–527.

Blühdorn, I. (2007) ‘Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation’, Environmental Politics, 16, pp. 251–275.

Edelman, M. J. (1990) Politik als Ritual: die symbolische Funktion staatlicher Institutionen und politischen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main; N.Y.: Campus Verlag, 1990. 202 p.

Finke, P., Souris, A. (2019) ‘The politics of legislative initiatives in the German Bundesrat’, Revista Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad, 9 (18), pp. 7–19.

Mendelberg, T. (2022) ‘Status, Symbols, and Politics: A Theory of Symbolic Status Politics, RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation’, Journal of the Social Sciences, 8 (6).

Tremblay, J.-F. (ed.) (2023) The Forum of Federations. Handbook of Fiscal Federalism. Springer Nature. 483 p.

Hájek, L. (2024) ‘Regional legislative initiatives in the Czech Republic’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2024.2378551.

Meyer, T. (1992) Inszenierung des Scheins. Voraussetzungen und Folgen symbolischer Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 205 p.

Mueller, M., Mazzoleni, O. (2016) ‘Regionalist protest through shared rule? Peripherality and the Use of cantonal initiatives in Switzerland’, Regional & Federal Studies, 26 (1), pp. 45–71. DOI:10.1080/13597566.2015.1135134.

Newig, J. (2007) ‘Symbolic Environmental Legislation and Societal Self-Deception’, Environmental Politics, 16, pp. 276–296. DOI:10.1080/09644010701211783.

Noble, B. (2019) ‘Regional legislatures and national lawmaking’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 25 (1), pp. 143–147. DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2019.1570597.

Palermo, F. (2018) ‘Beyond Second Chambers: Alternative Representation of Territorial Interests and Their Reasons’, Perspectives on Federalism, 10 (2), pp. 49–70.

Parra, D. (2016) ’La facultad autonomica de iniciar leyes estatales, una perspectiva comparada’, Revista D’estudis Autonтmics I Federals, 24, pp. 155–192.

Petersen, Roger, D. (2002) Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 262.

Sanjaume-Calvet, M., & Paneque, A. (2023) ‘Shared or Self-rule? Regional Legislative Initiatives in Multi-level Spain, 1979-2021’, South European Society and Politics, 28 (1), pp. 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2023.2228099.

Santesson-Wilson, P. (2003) Studier i symbolpolitik. Department of Political Science. Lund University. URL: http://lup.lub.lu.se/search/ws/files/4572022/4770578.pdf (Accessed: 29.09.2024)

Siehr, A. (2008) ‘Symbolic Legislation and the Need for Legislative Jurisprudence: The Example of the Federal Republic of Germany’, Legisprudence, 2, pp. 271–305.

Ugues, A., Vidal, X. M., & Bowler, S. (2017) ‘Los Congresos Estatales y la Política Federal en México: state legislatures and federal policymaking in Mexico’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23 (4), pp. 594–613. DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2017.1394740.

Published

2025-01-06

How to Cite

Sulimov К. А., & Turtseva К. П. (2025). LEGISLATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES OF RUSSIAN REGIONS IN THE FEDERAL PARLIAMENT: POLITICAL-STRATEGIC EFFECTIVENESS OR ISSUE-RELATED APPROACH?. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 18(4), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-111-127

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies