INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUMS AS AN INSTITUTION FOR MANAGING ETHNO-TERRITORIAL CONFLICTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-1-56-65Keywords:
political-territorial heterogeneity, institutional isomorphism, independence referendum, self-determination movements, ethnic conflict, right to self-determination, territorial integrityAbstract
One way of managing political-territorial heterogeneity within nation-states is to hold an independence referendum. This institution is characterized by its universality. However, their political, social, and economic consequences can vary from achieving full independence of a part of the territory to the aggravation of military conflicts. This study aims to identify how the political context in which decisions to hold independence referendums are made influences the outcome of a territorial conflict. Political context includes: peaceful/military conditions, consent of all actors to hold a referendum/unilateral plebiscite, and voting results. Using the theory of institutional isomorphism by P. DiMaggio and W. Powell, this paper identifies four typical contexts for holding independence referendums: 1) referendums in the context of military action; 2) unilateral referendums in the context of the existence of a de facto state; 3) unilateral referendums in peacetime; 4) referendums held within the framework of a conventional political process. Such plebiscites lead to a bloodless outcome if the following conditions are met: 1) both the separatists and the national center agree to hold a referendum; 2) the international community acts as an intermediary and recognizes the results of the vote; 3) the majority of citizens voted for independence and separation occurred.References
Руденко, В. Н. (2003) Прямая демократия: модели правления, конституционно-правовые институты. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН. [Rudenko, V. N. (2003) Direct Democracy: Models of Government, Constitutional and Legal Institutions [Pryamaya demokratiya: modeli pravleniya, konstitutsionno-pravovyye instituty], Yekaterinburg: UrO RAN (In Russ.)].
Шубин, А. В. (2016) ‘Распад CCCР: объективные причины и субъективные факторы’, Россия и АТР, 3 (93), с. 23–48. [Shubin, A. V. (2016) ‘The collapse of the USSR: objective reasons and subjective factors’ [Raspad CCCR: obyektivnyye prichiny i subyektivnyye faktory], Rossiya i ATR, 3 (93), pp. 23–48 (In Russ.)].
Alterman, J., Todman, W. (2018) Independence Movements and Their Aftermath: Self-Determination and the Struggle for Succes. New York: Center for Strategic & International Studies
Bradbury, M. (2008) Becoming Somaliland. Africa Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; Oxford: James Currey; London: Progression
Cassese, A. (1995) Self-Determination of Peoples. A Legal Reappraisal. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press
Collier, P., Hoeffler, A. (2002) ‘Greed and grievance in civil war’, Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), pp. 563–595. DOI: 10.2307/
Crawford, J. (2006) The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228423.
0001
Di Maggio, P., Powell, W. (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisted: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 147–160.
Fazal, M., Griffiths, R. ‘Membership Has Its Privileges: The Changing Benefits of Statehood’ International Studies Review, 16 (1), pp. 79–106. DOI: 10.1111/misr.12099
Germann, M. (2022) ‘Pax populi? An analysis of the conflict resolution potential of referendums on self-determination’, European Political Science Review, 14, pp. 403–423.
Guibernau, M. (2014) ‘Prospects for an Independent Catalonia’, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 27(1), pp. 5–23. DOI: 10.1007/s10767-013-9165-4 EDN: LKQPIK
Lee Sung, Yong, Mac Ginty, R. (2012) ‘Context and Postconflict Referendums’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 18, pp. 43–64.
Levy, R. (2018) ‘Shotgun Referendums: Popular Deliberation and Constitutional Settlement in Conflict Societies’, Melbourne University Law Review, 41(3), pp. 1237–1277.
Mazower, M. (2000) Dark Continent. Europe’s twentieth century. New York: Vintage Books
McEvoy, J. (2018) ‘Letting “the people(s)” decide: peace referendums and power-sharing settlements’, Democratization, 25(5), pp. 864–881. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2018.1426568
Palermo, F. (2019) ‘Towards a Comparative Constitutional Law of Secession?’ In Delledonne, G. & Martinico, D. (ed.) The Canadian Contribution to a Comparative Law of Secession: Legacies of the Quebec Secession Reference. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, pp. 265–282.
Qvortrup, M. (2014) Referendums and Ethnic Conflict. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: 10.9783/
EDN: XYQHOZ
Qvortrup, M. (2013) ‘The ‘Neverendum’?: A History of Referendums and Independence’, Political Insight, 4(2), pp. 4–7. DOI: 10.1111/2041-9066.12013
Regan, A. (2019) The Bougainville referendum: Law, administration and politics. Canberra: ANU Department of Pacific Affairs.
Richard, A., Stacey, R. (2022) The Limits and Legitimacy of Referendums. Oxford: Oxford Academy
Rolandsen, H. (2011) ‘A quick fix? A retrospective analysis of the Sudan Comprehensive Peace Agreement’, Review of African Political Economy, 38(130), pp. 551–564. DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2011.630869
Smith, A. (2001) ‘The role of the united nations in East Timor's path to independence’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 9(2), pp. 25–53. DOI:10.1080/02185370108434190
Tierney, S. (2012) Constitutional referendums: The theory and practice of republican deliberation. Oxford: University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592791.001.0001
Walker, M. (2003) The Strategic Use of Referendums: Power, Legitimacy, and Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781403973771
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.
