TOWARDS THE STUDY OF HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY IN THE ISET’ AND PYSHMA AREAS IN XVII CENTURY

Authors

  • G. Kh. Samigulov

Keywords:

yasak volost, uyezd, sloboda, tax population, administrative division, borders of tax territories

Abstract

The article concerns the administrative and tax division of the lands along the rivers Iset’ and PyshmainXVII century. The main purposes of the article are to study:1) how administrative borders were changed at the analyzed territories and (2) how yasakvolost territories and new-built Russian slobodas interacted. After joining of the Siberian Khanate lands to Muscovy, the Iset’ and Pyshma areas were included inthe Tyumen’ uyezd. Later, in 1598, the Verkhoturskyuyezd was formed and the lands upstream those rivers were moved to this uyezd. There were no Russian settlements at the lands until the1640s. The Turkic population, living there, paid the yasak(a natural tax, usually paid by skins of fur-producing animals). The lands along the rivers Pyshma and Iset’ were subdivided into some yasakvolosts. The yasakvolost was a name for the territory occupied by a group of people with blood relationships. The territory gave the opportunity to the tax-obligated population to get means of subsistence and the fur for the yasak tax. All yasakvolosts were included in the Tyumen’ uyezd, except for only one, at the upstream of the river Iset’ that was a part of the Verkhoturskyuyezd. In 1644,Dalmat established the Uspensky monastery on the Iset’ bank. It was the first Russian settlement at the territory. Thereafter,the Russian settlements along the rivers grew swiftly. At the beginning of the 1660s, there were five slobodas and ostrogs (small forts) and two monasteries. Some ostrogs and slobodas were established according to the orders from Verkhoturye, the most part of the settlements were built by the order of Tobol’sk and some were assigned by the order of the Tyumen’ administration. Since the late 1650s – early 1660s, Verkhoturye and Tobol’sk competed in the control of the lands in the middle-stream of the river Iset’ area. By the late 1660s, all Russian slobodas and ostrogs located in the river Iset’ area, except for the Kataiskyostrog, were subordinated to the Tobol’sk administration. In 1668 – 1669, theKataiskyostrog was moved from the Verkhoturskyuyezd to the Tobol’sk one. In 1671, the demarcation of borders between the Tobol’sk and Verkhoturskyuyezds was conducted, and all Russian slobodas and ostrogsbecame a part of the Tobol’skuyezd. The situation was much more complicated in the Pyshma area. By the end of XVIIII century, there were slobodas and ostrogs includedin theTobol’skuyezd as well as in theVerkhoturskyuyezd.The situation described above was very complicated and intricate. The Russian villages subordinated to Tuymen were also located in the inter-stream area of the rivers Iset’ and Pyshma after 1671, but the population of the Pyshma and Iset’ yasakvolosts paid the yasak to Tuymen as before. In other words, there was a real situation of mixed territories in the Pyshma-Iset’ territories. The situation has changed during the administrative and territorial reorganization in the Peter’s the Great times when the provinces and districts were created and administrative and tax affiliation of the people was properly established.

References

Акты исторические, собранные и изданные Археографической комиссией. Т. 4: 1645–1676. СПб., 1842. 587 с. (АИ).

Байдин В.И., Грачев В.Ю., Коновалов Ю.В., Мосин А.Г. Уктус, Уктусский завод и его окрестности в XVII – XVIII вв. Екатеринбург, 2011. 68 с.

Буцинский П.И. Заселение Сибири и быт ея первых насельников. Харьков, 1889. 353 с.

Вкладные книги Далматовского Успенского монастыря (последняя четверть XVII – начало XVIII в.): Сб. док. / сост. И.Л. Манькова. Свердловск, 1992. 245 с.

Дополнения к Актам историческим вобранным и изданным Археографической комиссией. СПб, 1848. Т. 3. 553 с.; 1851. Т. 4. 437 с. (ДАИ).

Долгих Б.О. Родовой и племенной состав народов Сибири в XVII в. М., 1960. 623 с.

Кондрашенков А. А. Зауральские слободчики XVII в. // Экономика, управление и культура Сибири XVI–XIX вв. Новосибирск, 1965. С. 6–16.

Кондрашенков А.А. Крестьяне Зауралья в XVII–XVIII в. Челябинск, 1966. Ч. 1, 2.

Курилов В.Н. Крест на перекрестке: свидетельство XVII столетия // Проблемы археологии, этнографии, антропологии Сибири и сопредельных территорий. Новосибирск, 2004. Т. 10, ч. 2. С. 69–72.

Материалы по истории Башкирской АССР. М.; Л., 1936. Ч. I. 629 с.

Менщиков В.В. Русская колонизация Зауралья в XVII–XVIII вв.: общее и особенное в региональном развитии: моногр. / науч. ред. В.В. Пундани. Курган, 2004. 200 с.

Миллер Г.Ф. История Сибири / ред. кол. Е.П. Батьянова, С.И. Вайнштейн и др. М., 2000. Т. 2. 796 с.

Миллер Г.Ф. История Сибири. 3-е изд. / ред. кол. Е.П. Батьянова, С.И. Вайнштейн и др. М., 2005. Т. 1. 630 с.; Т. 3. 598 с.

Пестерев В.В. Организация населения в колонизируемом пространстве: Очерки истории колонизации Зауралья конца XVI – середины XVIII вв. Курган, 2005. 237 с.

Плотников Г.С. Очерки истории бедствий Далматовскаго монастыря и частию края с 1644 по 1742 г. // Чтения в обществе истории и древностей российских. Генварь–март, кн. первая. М., 1863. Разд. 5: Смесь. С. 72–114.

Преображенский А.А. Урал и Западная Сибирь в конце XVI – начале XVIII в. М., 1972. 392 с.

Пузанов В.Д. Военно-административная система России в Южном Зауралье (конец XVI – начало XIX вв.) // История Курганской области. Курган, 2002. Т.7. С.7–200.

Пузанов В.Д. Военно-политические факторы колонизации Приисетья. Шадринск, 2001. 46 с.

Самигулов Г.Х. К истории ичкинских татар последней трети XVII – XVIII в. // Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии. Тюмень, 2015. № 4 (31). С. 100–107.

Самигулов Г.Х. От Далматова монастыря до Чебаркульской крепости. Чебаркуль; Челябинск, 2011. 280 с.

Самигулов Г.Х. Тюрки Южного Зауралья в конце XVI – первой половине XVIII в.: консолидация/разделение – к постановке вопроса // История, экономика и культура средневековых тюрко-татарских государств Западной Сибири. Курган, 2011. С. 127–131.

Чупин Н.К. Географический и статистический словарь Пермской губернии. Пермь, 1877. Т. 2, вып. 4. 210 с.

Шакурова Ф.А. Башкирская волость и община в середине XVIII – первой половине XIX в. Уфа, 1992. 136 с.

Шерстова Л.И.Тюрки и русские в Южной Сибири. Новосибирск, 2005. 312 с.

Шишонко В. Пермская летопись, третий период: с 1645–1676 г. Пермь, 1884. 1168 с.

Шунков В.И. Очерки по истории колонизации Сибири в XVII – начале XVIII вв. М.; Л., 1946. 229 с.

References

Akty istoricheskie, sobrannye i izdannye Arkheograficheskoy komissiey. T. 4: 1645–1676. SPb., 1842. 587 s. (AI).

Baydin V.I., Grachev V.Yu., Konovalov Yu.V., Mosin A.G. Uktus, Uktusskiy zavod i ego okrestnosti v XVII – XVIII vv. Ekaterinburg, 2011. 68 s.

Butsinskiy P.I. Zaselenie Sibiri i byt eya pervykh nasel'nikov. Khar'kov, 1889. 353 s.

Chupin N.K. Geograficheskiy i statisticheskiy slovar' Permskoy gubernii. Perm', 1877. T. 2, vyp. 4. 210 s.

Dolgikh B.O. Rodovoy i plemennoy sostav narodov Sibiri v XVII v. M.: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1960. 623 s.

Dopolneniya k Aktam istoricheskim vobrannym i izdannym Arkheograficheskoy komissiey. SPb, 1848. T. 3. 553 s. (DAI).

Dopolneniya k Aktam istoricheskim vobrannym i izdannym Arkheograficheskoy komissiey. T. 4. SPb., 1851. 437 s.

Kondrashenkov A. A. Zaural'skie slobodchiki XVII v. Ekonomika, upravlenie i kul'tura Sibiri XVI–XIX vv. Novosibirsk, 1965. S. 6–16.

Kondrashenkov A.A. Krest'yane Zaural'ya v XVII–XVIII v. Chelyabinsk, 1966. Ch. 1, 2.

Kurilov V.N. Krest na perekrestke: svidetel'stvo XVII stoletiya. Problemy arkheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredel'nykh territoriy. Novosibirsk, 2004. T. 10, ch. 2. S. 69–72.

Materialy po istorii Bashkirskoy ASSR. M.; L., 1936. Ch. I. 629 s.

Menshchikov V.V. Russkaya kolonizatsiya Zaural'ya v XVII–XVIII vv.: obshchee i osobennoe v regional'nom razvitii: monogr. / nauch. red. V.V. Pundani. Kurgan, 2004. 200 s.

Miller G.F. Istoriya Sibiri / red. kol. E.P. Bat'yanova, S.I. Vaynshteyn i dr. M., 2000. T. 2. 796 s.

Miller G.F. Istoriya Sibiri / red. kol. E.P. Bat'yanova, S.I. Vaynshteyn i dr. 3-e izd. M., 2005. T. 1. 630 s.

Miller G.F. Istoriya Sibiri. T. 3. M., 2005. 598 s.

Pesterev V.V. Organizatsiya naseleniya v koloniziruemom prostranstve: Ocherki istorii kolonizatsii Zaural'ya kontsa XVI – serediny XVIII vv. Kurgan, 2005. 237 s.

Plotnikov G.S. Ocherki istorii bedstviy Dalmatovskago monastyrya i chastiyu kraya s 1644 po 1742 g. Chteniya v obshchestve istorii i drevnostey rossiyskikh. Genvar'–mart, kn. pervaya. M., 1863. Razd. 5: Smes'. S. 72–114.

Preobrazhenskiy A.A. Ural i Zapadnaya Sibir' v kontse XVI – nachale XVIII v. M., 1972. 392 s.

Puzanov V.D. Voenno-administrativnaya sistema Rossii v Yuzhnom Zaural'e (konets XVI – nachalo XIX vv.). Istoriya Kurganskoy oblasti. Kurgan, 2002. T.7. S.7–200.

Puzanov V.D. Voenno-politicheskie faktory kolonizatsii Priiset'ya. Shadrinsk, 2001. 46 s.

Samigulov G.Kh. K istorii ichkinskikh tatar posledney treti XVII – XVIII v. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii. Tyumen', 2015. № 4 (31). S. 100–107.

Samigulov G.Kh. Ot Dalmatova monastyrya do Chebarkul'skoy kreposti. Chebarkul'; Chelyabinsk, 2011. 280 s.

Samigulov G.Kh. Tyurki Yuzhnogo Zaural'ya v kontse XVI – pervoy polovine XVIII v.: konsolidatsiya/razdelenie – k postanovke voprosa. Istoriya, ekonomika i kul'tura srednevekovykh tyurko-tatarskikh gosudarstv Zapadnoy Sibiri. Kurgan, 2011. S. 127–131.

Shakurova F.A. Bashkirskaya volost' i obshchina v seredine XVIII – pervoy polovine XIX v. Ufa, 1992. 136 s.

Sherstova L.I.Tyurki i russkie v Yuzhnoy Sibiri. Novosibirsk, 2005. 312 s.

Shishonko V. Permskaya letopis', tretiy period: s 1645–1676 g. Perm', 1884. 1168 s.

Shunkov V.I. Ocherki po istorii kolonizatsii Sibiri v XVII – nachale XVIII vv. M.; L., 1946. 229 s.

Vkladnye knigi Dalmatovskogo Uspenskogo monastyrya (poslednyaya chetvert' XVII – nachalo XVIII v.): Sb. dok. / sost. I.L. Man'kova. Sverdlovsk, 1992. 245 s.

Published

2020-07-15

How to Cite

Samigulov, G. K. (2020). TOWARDS THE STUDY OF HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY IN THE ISET’ AND PYSHMA AREAS IN XVII CENTURY. PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 32(1), 84–95. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/3427