What is a Historical Fact? The Evolution of Perception of a Basic Category of Historical Knowledge
Keywords:
historical fact, positivism, objectivity, relativism, historical knowledgeAbstract
The article traces the evolution of historians’ perception of “fact”, one of the key categories of historical knowledge, during the last one hundred years. It starts with an exposition of the positivistic paradigm of fact as an “atom” or a “brick” of history derived once and forever from historical sources. Prevailing in the late 19th and early 20th century, that view was severely criticized then by various opponents ranging from German historicists to American “presentists” and the French “Annales” School. Then, the author turns to the Soviet historiography and its discourse about “facts”, which, due to the limitations of the official Marxist methodology, could not fully free itself from the positivistic legacy. The article ends with clarifying the contours of a new concept of “historical fact” that has been formed at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries. This concept stresses the collective nature of scholarship: “facts” are now perceived as statements about past events that the majority of historians hold to be true. In the concluding remarks, some implications of the new concept of “fact” for the further progress of historical knowledge are discussed. In particular, as a result of such “epistemological” revolution, “facts” may concede their priority to other categories of historical research, including “hypothesis”, “problem”, and “observation”.doi 10.17072/2219-3111-2018-4-5-14References
Библиографический список
Барг М. А. Категории и методы исторической науки. М.: Наука, 1984. 342 с.
Библер В. С. Исторический факт как фрагмент действительности (Логические заметки)// Источниковедение. Теоретические и методические проблемы. М.: Наука, 1969. С. 89–101.
Булыгин И. А., Пушкарев Л. Н. Источниковедение // Советская историческая энциклопедия. Т. 6. Индра – Каракас. М.: Сов. энциклопедия, 1965. Стб. 592–601.
Вен П. Как пишут историю. Опыт эпистемологии / пер. с фр. Л. А. Торчинского. М.: Науч. мир, 2003. 394 с.
Гуревич А.Я. Что такое исторический факт? // Источниковедение. Теоретические и методические проблемы. М.: Наука, 1969. С. 59–88.
Коллингвуд Р. Дж. Идея истории. Автобиография / пер. и коммент. Ю. А. Асеева; отв. ред. И.С. Кон, М. А. Киссель. М.: Наука, 1980. 486 с.
Кроче Б. Теория и история историографии / пер. с ит. А. М. Заславской. М.: Школа «Языки русской культуры», 1998. 192 с.
Ланглуа Ш.-В., Сеньобос Ш. Введение в изучение истории. 2-е изд. / пер. с фр. А. Серебряковой. М.: Гос. публ. ист. б-ка России, 2004. 305 с.
Мейер Э. Теоретические и методологические вопросы истории. Философско-исторические исследования // Мейер Э. Труды по теории и методологии исторической науки. М.: Гос. публ. ист. б-ка России, 2003. С. 142–200.
Могильницкий Б. Г. Введение в методологию истории. М.: Высшая школа, 1989. 175 с.
Покровский М. Н. Избранные произведения в 4 кн. Кн. 3. Русская история в самом сжатом очерке. М.: Мысль, 1967. 671 с.
Про А. Двенадцать уроков по истории / пер. с фр. Ю. В. Ткаченко. М.: Рос. гос. гуманит. ун-т, 2000. 336 с.
Ракитов А. И. Историческое познание: Системно-гносеологический подход. М.: Политиздат, 1982. 303 с.
Савельева И. М., Полетаев А. В. Знание о прошлом: теория и история: в 2 т. Т. 1: Конструирование прошлого. СПб.: Наука, 2003. 632 с.
Уайт Х. Метаистория: Историческое воображение в Европе XIX в. / пер. с англ. под ред. Е.Г. Трубиной и В. В. Харитонова. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2002. 528 с.
Февр Л. Бои за историю / пер. А. А. Бобовича, М. А. Бобовича и Ю. Н. Стефанова; отв. ред. А.Я. Гуревич. М.: Наука, 1991. 630 с.
Becker C. What are Historical Facts? // The Western Political Quarterly. Vol. 8, No. 3 (September 1955). P. 327–340.
Brendecke A. Tatsache // Lexikon Geschichtswissenschaft: hundert Grundbegriffe / Hrsg. S. Jordan. Stuttgart: Reklam, 2002. S. 282–285.
Carr E. H. What is History? New York: Vintage Books, 1961. 209 p.
Fischer D. H. Historian’s Fallacies. Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. New York: Harper Perennial, 1970. 338 p.
Munslow A. The Routledge Companion to Historical Studies. London; New York: Routledge, 2000. 271 p.
Norkus Z. An Unproclaimed Empire: The Grand Duchy of Lithuania: From the Viewpoint of Comparative Historical Sociology of Empires / transl. from Lithuanian by A. Strunga. London; New York: Routledge, 2018. 414 p.
White H. Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore; London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978. 287 p.
References
Barg, M. A. (1984), Kategorii i metody istoricheskoy nauki [The Categories and Methods of Historical Scholarship], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 342 р.
Becker, C. (1955), “What are Historical Facts?”, The Western Political Quarterly, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 327-340.
Bibler, V. S. (1969), “A Historical Fact as a Fragment of Reality. (Logical Notes)”, in Istochnikovedenie. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie problemy [Source Criticism. Theoretical and Methodological Issues], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 89-101.
Brendecke, A. (2002), “Tatsache”, in: Lexikon Geschichtswissenschaft: hundert Grundbegriffe, hrsg. Stefan Jordan, Reklam, Stuttgart, Deutschland, s. 282-285.
Bulygin, I. A. & L. N. Pushkarev (1965), “Source Criticism”, in Sovetskaya istoricheskaya entsiklopediya [The Soviet Historical Encyclopedia], vol. 6., Izd. Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, Moscow, Russia, pp. 592-601.
Karr, E. H. (1961), What is History?, Vintage Books, New York, USA, column 592–601.
Kollingvud, R.G. (1980), Ideya istorii. Avtobiografiya [The Idea of hstory. An Autobiography], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 486 p.
Kroche, B. (1998), Teoriya i istoriya istoriografii [A theory and history of historiography], Yazyki russkoi kultury, Moscow, Russia, 192 p.
Fevr, L. (1991), Boi za istoriyu [Struggle for history], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 630 p.
Fischer, D.H. (1970), Historian’s Fallacies. Toward a Logic of Historical Thought, Harper Perennial, New York, USA, 338 p.
Gurevich, A.Ya. (1969), “What is a historical fact?”, in Istochnikovedenie. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie problemy [Source criticism. Theoretical and methodological issues], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 59-88.
Langlua, Ch.-V. & Ch. Seynobos (2004), Vvedenie v izuchenie istorii [An Introduction to the study of history], Gos. publ. ist. biblioteka, Moscow, Russia, 305 p.
Meyer, E. (2003), “Theoretical and methodological issues of history”, in Meyer, Trudy po teorii i metodologii istoricheskoi nauki [Works on theory and methodology of history], Gos. publ. ist. biblioteka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 142-200.
Mogil’nitskiy, B. G. (1989), Vvedenie v metodologiyu istorii [Introduction to the methodology of history], Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, Russia, 175 p.
Munslow, A. (2000), The Routledge Companion to Historical Studies, Routledge, London and New York, UK-USA, 271 p.
Norkus, Z. (2018), An Unproclaimed Empire: The Grand Duchy of Lithuania: From the Viewpoint of Comparative Historical Sociology of Empires, transl. from Lithuanian by A. Strunga,
Pokrovskiy, M. N. (1967), Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected works], vol. 3, Mysl’, Moscow, Russia, 671 p.
Prost, A. (2000), Dvenadtsat’ urokov po istorii [Twelve lessons in history], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, 336 p.
Rakitov, A. I. (1982), Istoricheskoe poznanie. Sistemno-gnoseologicheskiy podlhod [Historical knowledge. A Systemic and epistemological approach], Politizdat, Moscow, Russia, 303 p.
Savelyeva, I.M. & A.V. Poletaev (2003), Znanie o proshlom: teoriya i istoriya [Knowledge about the past: theory and history], Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia, 632 p.
Veyn, P. (2003), Kak pishut istoriyu [How history is written], Nauchnyy mir, Moscow, Russia, 394 p.
White, H. (1978), Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, USA-UK, 287 p.
Uayt, H. (2002), Metaistoriya. Istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope 19 veka [Metahistory. The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe], Izd. Ural’skogo universiteta, Yekaterinburg, Russia, P. 327–340.
