HISTORICAL TEMPORALITIES IN THE WORLD OF “IMPENETRABLE HORIZONS”: SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF MODERN GLOBAL HUMANITIES

Authors

  • I. E. Rogaeva National Research Tomsk State University, Lenin Ave., 36, Tomsk, 634050, Russia
  • G. N. Serbina National Research Tomsk State University, Lenin Ave., 36, Tomsk, 634050, Russia
  • N. V. Trubnikova National Research Tomsk State University, Lenin Ave., 36, Tomsk, 634050, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2025-3-26-40

Keywords:

temporality, interdisciplinarity, discourse, modern historiography, scientometrics, text mining, big data

Abstract

The rise of digital technologies opens up new opportunities for historiographic research on thematic trends, which are becoming increasingly interdisciplinary in scope. By now, a clear publication trend has emerged in leading English-language journals, focusing on reflections on the specificities of contemporary perception and the uniqueness of experiences of historical events, their reflections in collective memory. This article is devoted to the scientometric construction of scientific discourse on "historical temporalities" using automated analysis technologies of unstructured big data. The Scopus database of scientific publications was used as a data source, accessed via API. The text collection consisted of 964 articles published between 1995 and 2023 and indexed by Scopus in the Arts and Humanities and Social Sciences fields. Data analysis enabled the visualization of the geography of major centers of publication activity and the identification of researchers making significant contributions to understanding this issue. The authors identified the key concepts of the theoretical discourse on historical temporalities. Findings indicate that contemporary humanities reflection on historical temporalities encompasses discussions about differences in time perception, problems of periodization, the simultaneous existence of multiple temporalities that disrupt the linearity of past perception, and the value of unique and culturally conditioned local experiences of temporal experience. The diversity of aspects of temporal representations can be reduced to the common ideological foundation of the vast majority of studies – the recognition of the present's loss of linear predictability inherited from the modern era in the dynamics of historical processes.

References

Ассман А. Распалась связь времен? Взлет и падение темпорального режима Модерна. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2017. 272 с.

Бахтин М.М. Формы времени и хронотопа в романе. Очерки по исторической поэтике // Вопросы литературы и эстетики. М.: Художественная литература, 1975. С. 234‒407.

Baschet J. Défaire la tyrannie du present. Temporalités émergentes et futurs inédits. Paris: La Découverte, 2018. 320 р.

Hartog F. Régimes d’historicité. Présentisme et expériences du temps. Paris: Seuil, 2003. 263 p.

Hellerma J. Negotiating Presentism: Toward a Renewed Understanding of Historical Change // Rethinking History. 2020. Vol. 24, iss. 3-4. P. 442‒464. DOI: 10.1080/13642529.2020.1848132. EDN: SCPLXC.

Koselleck R. Sediments of Time: On Possible Histories / transl. and eds. Sean Franzel, Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2018. 344 р.

Koselleck R. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004. 340 р.

Simon Z.B. History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 209 p.

Spiegel G.M. David Carr’s Theory of Experiencing Times Past // History and Theory. 2019. Vol. 56, iss. 1. P. 15‒19

References

Assmann, A. (2017). Raspalas' svyaz' vremen? Vzlet i padenie temporal'nogo rezhima Moderna [Is time out of joint? On the rise and fall of the modern time regime]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1975). Forms of time and the chronotope in the novel: Essays on historical poetics. In Voprosy literatury i estetiki [Questions of literature and aesthetics] (pp. 234–407). Khudozhestvennaya literatura.

Baschet, J. (2018). Défaire la tyrannie du présent. Temporalités émergentes et futurs inédits. La Découverte.

Hartog, F. (2003). Régimes d’historicité. Présentisme et expériences du temps. Seuil.

Hellerma, J. (2020). Negotiating presentism: Toward a renewed understanding of historical change. Rethinking History, 24(3–4), 442–464.

Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Columbia University Press.

Koselleck, R. (2018). Sediments of time: On possible histories (S. Franzel & S.-L. Hoffmann, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

Simon, Z. B. (2019). History in times of unprecedented change: A theory for the 21st century. Bloomsbury Academic.

Spiegel, G. M. (2019). David Carr’s theory of experiencing times past. History and Theory, 56(1), 15–19.

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Rogaeva И. Е. ., Serbina Г. Н. ., & Trubnikova Н. В. . (2025). HISTORICAL TEMPORALITIES IN THE WORLD OF “IMPENETRABLE HORIZONS”: SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF MODERN GLOBAL HUMANITIES. PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, (3(70), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2025-3-26-40