Международная коммуникация в политической мысли постмодерна: теоретический аспект

Авторы

  • Вера Тормошева/ Vera Tormosheva Нижегородский государственный лингвистический университет

Ключевые слова:

международно-политическая коммуникация, политический актор, политологический постмодерн, сеть

Аннотация

Постмодернистская мысль имеет серьёзное влияние на изучение коммуникации в целом и политической коммуникации в частности. Однако применительно к исследованию международно-политической коммуникации постмодернистские подходы используются не в полной мере. Автором утверждается, что рассматриваемый феномен находится под влиянием постмодернистского пространства и постмодернистского времени. Международно-политическая составляющая постмодерна описана как реальность и как проблема. В политологическом постмодерне отмечен плюрализм методологических и теоретических изысканий и существование модернистских явлений DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2016-3-76-94

Биография автора

Вера Тормошева/ Vera Tormosheva, Нижегородский государственный лингвистический университет

Экстерн кафедры международных отношений и политологии

Библиографические ссылки

Abdullaev R.A., Ryhtik M.I. The Phenomenon of Advocacy Networks and How It is Affected by the Development of Internet Technologies. Power. 2014. № 6. P. 15–21. (In Rus.).

Aleksandrova Ju.A. Russian political culture in the context of postmodernity.Abstract of Cand. polit. sci. diss. Saratov, 2013. P. 37. (In Rus.).

Antanovich N.A. The prospects of the network approach in political studies.Sociologija [Sociology]. 2010. № 2. P. 44–53. (In Rus.).

Artjukhina E.V. Internet as a means of political communication. Science Journal of VolgogradStateUniversity. Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies.2008. № 2 (8). P. 121–124. (In Rus.).

Baudrillard J.Symbolic exchange and death. M., Dobrosvet Publ., 2000. 387 p. (In Rus.).

Vel'sh V. «Postmodernity». Genealogy and meaning of one debatable notion. Put'[The way]. 1992. № 1. P. 109–136. (In Rus.).

Gordeev I.V. The specifics of global politics in the postmodern world. Power. 2008. № 3. P. 79–82. (In Rus.).

Deleuze G., Guattari P.F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Ekaterinburg,U-Faktoriya Publ., 2007. 672 p. (In Rus.).

Jameson F. Postmodernity or the cultural logic of the late capitalism. Modern literary theory. Anthology. Compiled by I.V. Kabanova. M., Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2004. P. 273–293. 344. p.(In Rus.).

Jameson F. Postmodernity and consumer society. Logos. 2000. № 4. P. 63–77. (In Rus.).

Zinov'eva E.S. International political aspects of the Internet development. Vestnik MGIMO-University. 2013. № 4(31). P. 135–140. (In Rus.).

Il'in M.V., Smorgunov L.V. Comparative politology. World political science in the 20th century: Collection of studies.M., INION Publ., 2001. P. 109–145. 253 p. (In Rus.).

Kazakova D.S. The specifics of the Internet as political communicative space. Review of Political Sciences. 2012. № 2. P. 107–118. (In Rus.).

Kravchenko S.A. Modernity and postmodernity: the «old» and new vision. Sociological Studies. 2007. № 9. P. 24–34. (In Rus.).

Lektorova Ju.Ju. Political communication in the network landscape: Actors and cooperation models. Abstract of Cand. polit. sci. diss. Perm, 2011. p. 23. (In Rus.).

Lyotard J.F. The postmodern condition. St.Petersburg, Aletejja Publ., 1998. 160 p. (In Rus.).

New Philosophical Encyclopedia. Available at: http://iph.ras.ru/elib/2378.html. (accessed 10.12.2015) (In Rus.).

Opanasenko N.V. The Network Approach in Political Communication Studies. The Bulletin of Peoples` FriendshipUniversity of Russia Series Political Science. 2013. № 4. P. 119–125. (In Rus.).

Sokolov A.V., Maklashin I.S. Features of the Internet Space as a Platform for Interaction. Power. 2013. № 12. P. 60–62. (In Rus.).

Toffler A. Future Shock.Moscow, AST Publ., 2002. 557 p. (In Rus.).

Foucault M.Intellectuals and Power: articles and interviews, 1970–1984: In 3 Parts: Part 3. Ed. by V.P. Bol'shakov. M., Praksis Publ., 2006. 311 p. (In Rus.).

Habermas J. Europe, the Faltering Project. Political Essays XI. M., Ves' Mir Publ., 2012. 160 p. (In Rus.).

Habermas J. The Postnational Constellation and the Future of Democracy. Political Essays. M., Praksis Publ., 2005. 368 p. (In Rus.).

Habermas J. Public Space and Political Public Space – The Biographical Roots of Two Motifs in My Thoughts.Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. M.,Ves' Mir Publ., 2011. 336 p. (In Rus.).

Habermas J. The DividedWest. M., Ves' Mir Publ., 2008. 192 p. (In Rus.).

Habermas J. ThePhilosophicalDiscourse of Modernity. M., Ves' Mir Publ., 2003. 416 p. (In Rus.).

Asante M.K., Miike Y., Yin J. (Eds.). The global intercultural communication reader. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Routledge, 2014. (In English).

Braman S. From the modern to the postmodern: The future of global communications theory and research in a pandemonic age. Mody B. (Ed.). International and development communication: A 21st-century perspective. Thousand Hills, CA: Sage, 2003. P. 109–123. (In English). 29. Chang T.-K. Changing global media landscape, unchanging theories? International communication research and paradigm testing. Golan G.J., Johnson T.J., Wanta W. (Eds.). International communication in a global age.N.Y.: Routledge, 2010. P. 8–35. (In English).

Chuang R. Apostmodern critique of cross-cultural and intercultural communication research: Contesting essentialism, positivist dualism, and Eurocentricity. Starosta W., Chen G. (Eds.). International and intercultural communication annual: Ferment in the intercultural field: Axiology, value, praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003. P. 24–56. (In English).

Inglehart R. Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1997.(In English).

Klyukanov I.E. Principles of intercultural communication. Boston: Pearson, 2005. (In English).

Martin J.N., Nakayama T.K. Intercultural communication in contexts (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill: Boston, 2010. P. 4–38. (In English).

Patel F., Li M., Sooknanan P. (Eds.). Intercultural communication: Building a global community. L.: Sage, 2011. (In English).

Payne M., Askeland G.A.Globalization and international social work: postmodern change and challenge. L.: Ashgate, 2008. (In English).

Rodgers J. Spatializing international politics: Analyzing activism on the Internet.L.: Routledge, 2003. (In English).

Загрузки

Опубликован

2018-10-07

Как цитировать

Vera Tormosheva В. Т. (2018). Международная коммуникация в политической мысли постмодерна: теоретический аспект. Вестник Пермского университета. Политология / Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, (3), 76–94. извлечено от http://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/1688