Theoretical and ideological foundations of the chronotopological conception in the context of rethinking the modern state of philosophy and its classical categorical schemes
PHILOSOPHY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-3-441-451Keywords:
chronotope, time, space, human, culture, existenceAbstract
The subject of the study is revision of the philosophical, theoretical, and ideological foundations of the chronotopological model of being (the idea of the spatiotemporal organization of being developed by A.A. Ukhtomsky and M.M. Bakhtin) in the context of existentially oriented criticism of the modern philosophical situation and the subsequent rethinking of the dialectical and categorical schemes of classical European philosophy, to which Russian philosophical culture belongs. To date, the development of the chronotopological concept from a single term «chronotope» to a full-fledged autonomous philosophical discipline (such as phenomenology, philosophical hermeneutics, philosophical anthropology) seems impossible without fundamental rethinking of the foundations of its not only logical but also existential consistency, which, in turn, is impossible without referring to the existential foundations of being of a modern philosopher and modern philosophy. Existential completeness and authenticity are considered as the fundamental basis of philosophizing and philosophical conception in the struggle against existential incompleteness, alienation, and fallenness, which characterize the modern existence of human. In the context of the author’s version of the path of formation of the fundamental categorical base of chronotopology as an independent philosophical direction, its conceptual foundation is proposed, in which the synthesis of fundamental conceptual and dialectical schemes of the European philosophical tradition critically revised from an existential point of view is realized, and vectors of further concretization of the chronotopological models of the universe, human being, social structure, cultural and historical development become possible. At the same time, the proposed scheme does not privatize or cancel other probabilistic trajectories of the evolution of the chronotope concept, which does not contradict the principle of existential authenticity of the theory articulated by the study.References
Августин. Исповедь блаженного Августина, епископа Гиппонского. М.: АСТ, 2006. 448 с.
Августин. Трактаты о различных вопросах. М.: Империум Пресс, 2005. 352 с.
Бадью А. Манифест философии. СПб.: Machina, 2003. 184 с.
Бахтин М.М. К философии поступка // Бахтин М.М. Собр. соч. Т. 1: Философская эстетика 1920-х годов. М.: Русские словари; Языки славянской культуры, 2003. С. 7–68.
Бахтин М.М. Формы времени и хронотопа в романе // Бахтин М.М. Собр. соч. Т. 3: Теория романа (1930–1961 гг.). М.: Языки славянских культур, 2012. С. 341–511.
Брейе Э. Философия Плотина. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2012. 392 с.
Гегель Г.В.Ф. Наука логики: в 3 т. Т. 1. М.: Мысль, 1970. 501 с.
Гегель Г.В.Ф. Феноменология духа. М.: Наука, 2000. 495 с.
Декарт Р. Рассуждение о методе, чтобы верно направлять свой разум и отыскивать истину в науках // Декарт Р. Соч.: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1989. Т. 1. С. 250–296.
Деррида Ж. Позиции. М.: Академ. проект, 2007. 160 с.
Железняк В.Н. Мышление и воля. Пермь: Издво ПНИПУ, 2015. 616 с.
Комаров С.В. Метафизика и феноменология субъективности. СПб.: Алетейя, 2007. 736 с.
Лейбниц Г.В. Монадология // Лейбниц Г.В. Соч.: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1982. Т. 1. С. 413–429.
Маковельский А.О. Досократики. Доэлеатовский и элеатовский периоды. Минск: Харвест, 1999. 784 с.
Мейясу K. После конечности: эссе о необходимости контингентности. Екатеринбург; М.: Кабинетный ученый, 2015. 196 с.
Платон. Парменид // Платон. Диалоги. М.: Эксмо, 2008. Кн. 1. С. 1021–1100.
Плотин. Космогония. М.: REFL-book; Киев: Ваклер, 1995. 304 с.
Сартр Ж.-П. Бытие и ничто. М.: Республика, 2000. 639 с.
Сартр Ж.-П. Проблемы метода. Статьи. М.: Академ. проект, 2008. 222 с.
Стерледева Т.Д. Информационное общество: новые категории и методы исследования человека и его будущего // Ученые записки гуманитарного факультета. Пермь: ПГТУ, 2005. Вып. 13. С. 150–160.
Ухтомский А.А. О хронотопе // Ухтомский А.А. Доминанта. Статьи разных лет. 1887–1939. СПб.: Питер, 2002. С. 67–71.
Ясперс К. Философия. Кн. 1: Философское ориентирование в мире. М.: Канон+, РООИ «Реабилитация», 2012. 384 с.
References
Augustinus (2005). Traktaty o razlichnykh voprosakh [Treatises on various issues]. Moscow: Imperium Press Publ., 352 p.
Augustinus (2006). Ispoved’ blazhennogo Avgustina, episkopa Gipponskogo [Confession of saint Augustinus, bishop of Hippo].Moscow: AST Publ., 448 p.
Badiou, A. (2003). Manifest filosofii [Manifesto of philosophy]. St. Petersburg: Machina Publ., 184 p.
Bakhtin, M.M. (2003). [To the philosophy of the act]. Bakhtin M.M. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 1: Filosofskaya estetika 1920-kh godov [Bakhtin M.M. Collected works. Vol. 1: Philosophical aesthetics of the 1920s]. Moscow: Russkie Slovari Publ., Yazyki slavyanskoy Kul’tury Publ., pp. 7–68.
Bakhtin, M.M. (2012). [Forms of time and chronotope in a novel]. Bakhtin M.M. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 3: Teoriya romana (1930–1961 gg.) [Bakhtin M.M. Collected works. Vol. 3: Theory of the novel (1930–1961)]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur Publ., pp. 341–511.
Brehier, E. (2012). Filosofiya Plotina [The philosophy of Plotinus]. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 392 p.Derrida, J. (2007). Pozitsii [Positions]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., 160 p.
Descartes, R. (1989). [A Discourse on the Method: of Correctly Conducting One’s Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences]. Descart R. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Descartes R. Works: in 2 vols]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 1, pp. 250–296.
Jaspers, K. (2012). Filosofiya. Kn. 1: Filosofskoe orientirovanie v mire [Philosophy. Book 1: Philosophical orientation in the world]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., ROOI «Reabilitatsiya» Publ., 384 p.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1970). Nauka logiki: v 3 t. T. 1[The science of logic: in 3 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 501 p.
Hegel, G.W.F. (2000). Fenomenologiya dukha[The phenomenology of the spirit]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 495 p.
Komarov, S.V. (2007). Metafizika i fenomenologiya sub’ektivnosti [Metaphysics and phenomenology of subjectivity]. St. Petersburg:Aleteyya Publ., 736 p.
Leibniz, G.W. (1982). [Monadology]. Leibnits G.W. Sochineniya: v 4 t. [Leibniz G.W. Works:in 4 vols]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 1, pp. 413–429.
Makovel’skiy, A.O. (1999). Dosokratiki. Doeleatovskiy i eleatovskiy periody [Pre-Socratics. Doeleat and eleat periods]. Minsk: Kharvest Publ., 784 p.
Meillassoux, Q. (2015). Posle konechnosti: esse o neobkhodimosti kontingentnosti [After finitude: essay on the need for contingency]. Yekaterinburg, Moscow: Kabinetnyy Uchenyy Publ., 196 p.
Plato (2008). [Parmenides]. Platon. Dialogi [Plato. Dialogs]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., book 1, pp. 1021–1100.
Plotinus (1995). Kosmogoniya [Cosmogony]. Moscow: REFL-Book Publ., Kiev: Vakler Publ., 304 p.
Sartre, J.-P. (2000). Bytie i nichto [Being and nothing]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 639 p
Sartre, J.-P. (2008). Problemy metoda. Stat’i[Method problems. Articles]. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 222 p.
Sterledeva, T.D. (2005). [The information society: New categories and methods of researching man and his future]. Uchenye zapiski gumanitarnogo fakul’teta [Academic Notes of the Faculty of Humanities]. Perm: PSTU Publ., iss. 13, pp. 150–160
Ukhtomskiy, A.A. (2002). [About the chronotope]. Ukhtomskiy A.A. Dominanta. Stat’i raznykh let. 1887–1939 [Ukhtomskiy A.A. Dominant. Articles of different years. 1887–1939]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., pp. 67–71.
Zheleznyak, V.N. (2015). Myshleniye i volya [Thinking and will]. Perm: PNRPU Publ., 616 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.