Postmodern society: past or present?

Authors

  • Christina V. Vorobeva Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2076-0590-2024-11-110-119%20

Keywords:

postmodernism, late capitalism, F. Jamieson, J. S. Smith, and J. S. Smith. Vattimo, metamodernism, hypermodernism

Abstract

The concept of "postmodernism" is considered as a socio-philosophical category. The most characteristic features of postmodernism are highlighted: pluralism of views and denial of progress, proclamation of the "end of history", rebellion against classical rationality, the dominance of anti-fundamentalism and non-essentialism, rejection of truth, denial of the possibility of thinking of the subject as an ontological whole. In accordance with F. Jamieson's concept, postmodernity is interpreted as the logic of the culture of late capitalism, as a reaction to the historical failures of the 20th century. The author analyzes the question of the end of postmodernism, presents a brief overview of such trends of "post-postmodernism" as metamodernism, hypermodernism, etc., and shows that they either focus on issues that are not of broad public interest, or offer "reconciliation" with modernity, while thinking within the boundaries of postmodernist optics. Ultimately, the answer to the question of the end of postmodern society depends on how it is defined. If postmodernity is synonymous with a revolt against modernity, then, having fulfilled its historical task, it has exhausted itself. However, the essential features of culture and social life that the postmodern era brought with it remain in our time. This circumstance gives grounds to conclude that the modern era can be called late postmodernity, and it still appears as an ideological product of late capitalism.

Author Biography

Christina V. Vorobeva , Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Postgraduate student of the Department of Philosophy in the direction of “Philosophy, Ethics and Religious Studies”

References

Уэст Д. Континентальная философия. Введение. М.: Дело, 2015. С.323-371.

Джеймисон Ф. Постмодернизм, или Культурная логика позднего капитализма / пер. с англ. Д. Кралечкина; под науч. ред. А. Олейникова. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара, 2019. – 808 с.

Момджян К. Х. Возвращаясь к поиску истин: еще раз о состоянии современной социальной философии // Вопросы философии. 2021. № 2. С. 29-41.

Андерсон П. Истоки постмодерна / пер. с англ. А. Апполонова под ред. М. Маяцкого. М.: Изд. дом «Территория будущего», 2011. ‒ 208 с.

Ваттимо Дж. Прозрачное общество. Пер. с ит. / пер. Дм. Новикова. М.: Логос, 2002. – 128 с.

Тихонова, С.В. Трансгуманизм, наука и лженаука: в поисках Неомодерна/С.В. Тихонова// Вопросы философии. 2021. № 10. С. 29-39.

Мусаелян Л.А. Теоретическое наследие Маркса и современность. Статья вторая. Теория и практика марксизма // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2020. №1. С. 14–28.

Павлов А.В. Образы современности в XXI веке: метамодернизм // Философско-литературный журнал «Логос». 2018. № 6 (127). С. 1–19.

Vermeulen T., van den Akker R. Notes on Metamodernism // Journal of Aesthetics & Culture. 2010. Vol. 2. Pp. 1‒14.

Павлов А.В. Образы современности в XXI веке: гипермодернизм // Философский журнал. 2019. № 2. С. 20–33.

Published

2024-06-17

Issue

Section

Статьи