COMPETITION OR CONSENSUS? ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION IN THE ABSENCE OF A "GREEN" PARTY: THE CASE OF THE STATE DUMA OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF THE 4TH-7TH CONVOCATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-128-139

Keywords:

environmental legislation, State Duma, deputies, factions, dominant party, competition, inter-faction interaction

Abstract

Environmental issues have become a global concern, prompting legislative action. This paper examines the case of the initiation and adoption of environmental legislation in the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation in the period from the 4th to the 7th convocations - when there is no specialized "green" party in parliament, but there is a dominant party in power and the so-called "systemic opposition". At the same time, the Russian legislative process is characterized by a high level of activity of deputies in initiating bills. Who takes the lead in environmental legislation and how do political parties relate to each other in this context? Based on data from the State Duma, the dominant party was found to be the strongest in the environmental field. United Russia leads in the number of bills submitted and more often achieves their adoption due to its control over the parliamentary majority. The opposition is forced to enter into coalitions with the ruling party to increase the chances of initiatives being adopted. At the same time, the proportion of coalition bills tends to decrease with each convocation. Thus, United Russia is a key player in environmental legislation, effectively combining the promotion of its own initiatives with participation in coalitions.

Author Biography

Andrey Mikheev, Perm State University

postgraduate student, junior research fellow of the Department of Political Science, Faculty of History and Political Science

References

Дюверже, М. (2000) Политические партии. Пер. с франц. Москва: Академический Проект [Duverger, M. (2000) Political parties [Politicheskiye partii], Moscow: Academic Project. (In Russ.)].

Мальцев, А. М., Зарипов, Н. А. (2023) ‘Сети совместного законотворчества: факторы соавторства законопроектов депутатов Государственной думы VI–VII созывов’, Политическая наука, 14 (1), pp. 270–302. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2023.01.12 [Maltsev, A. M., Zaripov, N. A. (2023) ‘Networks of joint lawmaking: factors of co-authorship of bills of deputies of the State Duma of the VI-VII convocations’ [Seti sovmestnogo zakonotvorchestva: faktory soavtorstva zakonoproyektov deputatov Gosudarstvennoy dumy VI–VII sozyvov], Political Science, 14 (1), pp. 270–302. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2023.01.12 (In Russ.)].

Сартори, Дж. (2004) ‘Партии и партийные системы: рамки анализа’ в: Анохина, Н. В., Мелешкина, Е. Ю. (ред) Партии и выборы: Хрестоматия, РАН.ИНИОН. Центр социальных научно-информационных исследований. Отдел политической науки. Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД РФ, с.7–14. [Sartori, J. (2004) ‘Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis’ [Partii i partiynyye sistemy: ramki analiza], in: Anokhina, N.V., Meleshkina, E.Yu. (eds.) Parties and Elections: Reader, RAS.INION. Center for Social Scientific and Information Research. Department of Political Science. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, pp.7–14. (In Russ.)].

Панов, П. В., Сулимов, К. А. (2023) ‘Идеологическая «гармония» в Государственной думе: возникновение, содержание, границы’, Политическая наука, 16 (1), сс. 61–91. DOI:10.31249/poln/2023.01.03 [Panov, P. V., Sulimov, K. A. (2023) ‘Ideological “harmony” in the State Duma: emergence, content, boundaries’ [Ideologicheskaya «garmoniya» v Gosudarstvennoy dume: vozniknoveniye, soderzhaniye, granitsy], Political Science, 16 (1), pp. 61–91. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2023.01.03 (In Russ.)].

Панов, П. В., Сулимов К. А. (2021) ‘Партия власти и системная оппозиция в Государственной Думе: конвергенция публичной риторики’, Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 13 (4), сс. 516–535. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2021-4-516-535. [Panov, P. V., Sulimov K. A. (2021) ‘The Party of Power and the Systemic Opposition in the State Duma: Convergence of Public Rhetoric’ [Partiya vlasti i sistemnaya oppozitsiya v Gosudarstvennoy Dume: konvergentsiya publichnoy ritoriki], Ars Administrandi (The Art of Administration), 13 (4), pp. 516–535. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2021-4-516-535 (In Russ.)].

Толмачева, И.В. (2021) ‘Особенности законотворческого соавторства депутатов Государственной Думы VII созыва’, Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета, 11 (5), pp. 92–100. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-5-92-100 [Tolmacheva, I.V. (2021) ‘Features of legislative co-authorship of deputies of the State Duma of the VII convocation’ [Osobennosti zakonotvorcheskogo soavtorstva deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy VII sozyva], Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University, 11 (5), pp. 92–100. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-5-92-100 (In Russ.)].

Abou-Chadi, T. (2016) ‘Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact’, British Journal of Political Science, 46 (2), pp. 417–436. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000155.

Adams, J., Merrill, S. (2009) ‘Policy-Seeking Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy with Proportional Representation: A Valence-Uncertainty Model’, British Journal of Political Science, 39 (3), pp. 539–558. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000562.

Bogaards, M. (2004) ‘Counting Parties and Identifying Dominant Party Systems in Africa’, European Journal of Political Research, 44, pp. 173–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00150.x.

Bucchianeri, P. (2020) ‘Party Competition and Coalitional Stability: Evidence from American Local Government’, American Political Science Review, 114 (4), pp. 1055–1070. doi:10.1017/S0003055420000386.

Buchan, D. (2012) ‘The Energiewende – Germany’s gamble (Publisher's version)’, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, pp. 2–35.

Crowley, K. (2013) ‘Pricing carbon: The politics of climate policy in Australia’, WIREs Climate Change, 4 (6), pp. 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.239.

Downs, A. (1957) An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

Greene, K. (2010) ‘The Political Economy of Authoritarian Single-Party Dominance’, Comparative Political Studies, 43 (7), pp. 807–834. DOI: 10.1177/0010414009332462.

Hildingsson, R., Knaggard, A. (2022) 'The Swedish Carbon Tax: A Resilient Success', in: Caroline de la Porte, and others (eds.) Successful Public Policy in the Nordic Countries: Cases, Lessons, Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239–262.

Hobolt, S., De Vries, C. (2016) ‘Turning against the union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections’, Electoral Studies, 44 (4), pp. 504–514. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.006.

Janicke, M. (2017) ‘The multi-level system of global climate governance: The model and its current state’, Environmental Policy and Governance, 27 (2), pp. 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1747.

Langfield, D. (2014) ‘Opposition Growth in Dominant Party Systems: Coalitions in South Africa’, Government and Opposition, 49 (2), pp.290–312. doi:10.1017/gov.2013.31

Noble, B. (2017) ‘The State Duma, the “Crimean consensus”, and Volodin’s reforms’ in: A. Barbashin, O. Irisova, F. Burkhardt et al. (eds.), A successful failure: Russia after Crime(a), Warsaw: Centre for Polish-Russian Dialogue and Understanding, pp. 103–119.

Tvarno, C. (2022) ‘The New Era of Climate Law in Denmark and in the EU’, European Public Law, 28 (1), pp. 101–122. https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2022006.

Wagner, M. (2012) ‘Defining and measuring niche parties’, Party Politics, 18 (6), pp. 845–864. DOI10.1177/1354068810393267.

Suttner, R. (2006) ‘Party Dominance ‘Theory’: Of What Value?’, Politikon, 33 (3), pp. 277–297. DOI: 10.1080/02589340601122901.

Wagner, M., Meyer, T. (2017) ‘The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014’, Political Studies, 65 (1), pp. 84–107. DOI: 10.1177/0032321716639065.

Published

2025-01-06

How to Cite

Mikheev А. К. (2025). COMPETITION OR CONSENSUS? ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION IN THE ABSENCE OF A "GREEN" PARTY: THE CASE OF THE STATE DUMA OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF THE 4TH-7TH CONVOCATIONS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 18(4), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-128-139

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies