CONSULTATIVE AND ADVISORY BODIES ON CULTURAL HERITAGE ISSUES IN RUSSIAN REGIONS: BETWEEN DELIBERATION AND IMITATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-3-79-89Keywords:
consultative and advisory bodies; public councils; public scrutiny; civil society; cultural heritage; cultural policyAbstract
The article attempts to answer the question why in some regions consultative and advisory bodies on cultural heritage reporting to senior officials and senior executive bodies of Russian regions actually become mediating institutions (intermediaries) ensuring civil participation in the policy-making process, while in others they only imitate the interaction between government and society. Consultative and advisory bodies of St. Petersburg, Leningrad and Pskov regions were selected as examples for comparative analysis. Each of these bodies emerged under different conditions and due to different reasons, which determined their course of development. The study concludes that, in a number of cases, consultative and advisory bodies were able to influence the adoption of political and managerial decisions. However, the effectiveness of their activities as mediating institutions depended entirely on: 1) the interest of senior regional officials in interacting with public associations and expert communities to solve problems; 2) the participation of representatives of public associations actively advocating the preservation of cultural heritage.References
Барабашев, А. Г. (2016) ‘Кризис государственного управления и его влияние на основные административные парадигмы государства и бюрократии’, Вопросы го¬су¬дарственного и муниципального уп-рав¬ления, 3, сс. 163–194. [Bara¬ba-shev, A. G. (2016) ‘Crisis of State Gov-ernance and its Influence on Basic Ad-ministrative Paradigms of State and Bu-reaucracy’ [Krizis gosudarstvennogo up-ravleniya i ego vliya¬nie na osnovnye ad-ministrativnye paradig¬my gosudarstva i biurokratii], Public Admi¬nis¬tration Issues, 3, pp. 163–194. (In Russ.)].
Брянцев, И. И., Евстифеев, Р. В. (2020) ‘Про-блемы оценки эффективности институ-тов государственно-общественного управления (на примере Общественных палат Владимирской и Саратовской об-ластей)’, Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления, 1, сс. 115–136. [Bryantsev, I. I., Evstifeev, R. V. (2020) ‘Problems of Evaluating the Effec-tiveness of the Institutions of State and Society Interaction (The Cases of Re-gional Public Chambers of the Vladimir and Saratov Regions)’ [Рroblemy otsenki effektivnosti institutov gosudarstvenno-obshchestvennogo upravleniya (na pri-mere obshchestvennykh palat Vladi-mirskoi i Saratovskoi oblastei)], Public Administration Issues, 1, pp. 115–136. (In Russ.)].
Вяткин, И. О., Кабанов, Ю. А., Карягин, М. Е., Кукарцев, С. М., Миронов, П. Д. (2021) ‘Условия информационной открытости общественных консультативных сове-тов в Санкт-Петербурге: сравнитель-ный анализ’, Вестник Пермского уни-верситета. Серия: Политология, 2, сс. 129–141. [Vjatkin, I. O., Kabanov, Ju. A., Karjagin, M. E., Kukarcev, S. M., Mi-ro¬nov, P. D. (2021) ‘Information open-ness of public advisory councils in St. Pe-tersburg: comparative analysis of condi-tions’, [Uslovija informacionnoj otkryto-sti obshhestvennyh konsul'tativnyh sovetov v Sankt-Peterburge: sravnitel'nyj analiz], Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Serija: Politologija, 2, рp. 129–141. (In Russ.)].
Горный, М. Б. (2011) ‘Общественно-кон¬сульта-тивные структуры при органах власти: опыт Санкт-Петербурга’, Телескоп: журнал социологических и маркетинго-вых исследований, 2, сс. 14–24. [Gornyj, M. B. (2011) ‘Public Advisory Structures under Government Bodies: The Experi-ence of St. Petersburg’ [Obshhestvenno-konsul'tativnye struktury pri organah vlasti: opyt Sankt-Peterburga’, Teleskop: zhurnal sociologicheskih i marketingovyh issledovanij, 2, pp. 14–24. (In Russ.)]
Дьякова, Е. Г. (2017) ‘Общественные советы при органах исполнительной власти: к вопросу об общественном контроле’, Теории и проблемы политических ис-следований, 6 (3А), сс. 96–117. [D'yako-va, E. G. (2017) ‘Public councils at the regional level: some areas of activity’ [Obshchestvennye sovety pri organakh ispolnitel'noi vlasti: k voprosu ob ob-shchestvennom kontrole], Theories and Problems of Political Studies, 6 (3A), pp. 96–117. (In Russ.)].
Дьякова, Е. Г., Трахтенберг, А. Д. (2019) ‘Об-щественные советы при органах ис-полнительной власти: эксперты, кон-тролеры или мирские челобитчики?’, Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 6 (154), сс. 180–201. [D'yakova, E. G., Trahtenberg, A. D. (2019) ‘Public Coun-cils under the Executive Branch: Experts, Supervisors, or Worldly Petitioners?’ [Obshchestvennye sovety pri organah ispolnitel'noj vlasti: eksperty, kontrolery ili mirskie chelobitchiki?], Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 6 (154), pp. 180–201. (In Russ.)].
Евстифеев, Р. В. (2018) ‘Общественные палаты субъектов Российской Федерации в си-стеме управления региона: основные проблемы функционирования и оценки эффективности работы’, Научный ре-зультат. Социология и управление, 4 (4), сс. 87–100. [Evstifeev, R. V. (2018) ‘Public chambers of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the regonal system of government: the main problems of functioning and evaluation of the effi-ciency of work’, [Obshhestvennye palaty sub'ektov Rossijskoj Federacii v sisteme upravlenija regiona: osnovnye problemy funkcionirovanija i ocenki jeffektivnosti raboty], Research Result. Sociology and management, 4 (4), pp. 87–100. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-8
Мерсиянова, И. В., Якобсон, Л. И. (2011) ‘Со-трудничество государства и структур гражданского общества в решении со-циальных проблем’, Вопросы государ-ственного и муниципального управле-ния, 2, сс. 5–24. [Mersijanova, I. V., Jak-obson, L. I. (2011) ‘Cooperation between the state and civil society structures in solving social problems’ [Sotrudnichestvo gosudarstva i struktur grazhdanskogo ob-shhestva v reshenii social'nyh problem], Public Administration Issues, 2, pp. 5–24. (In Russ.)]
Нездюров, А. Л., Сунгуров, А. Ю. (2008) ‘Вза-имодействие органов власти и структур гражданского общества: возможные модели и их реализация в обществен-но-политической жизни современной России’, в: Якобсон, Л. И. (ред.) Фак-торы развития гражданского обще-ства и механизмы его взаимодействия с государством. Москва: Вершина, сс. 209–236. [Nezdyurov, A. L., Sungurov, A. Yu. (2008) ‘Interaction between gov-ernment bodies and civil society struc-tures: possible models and their imple-mentation in the socio-political life of modern Russia’ [Vzaimodejstvie organov vlasti i struktur grazhdanskogo ob-shchestva: vozmozhnye modeli i ih real-izaciya v obshchestvenno-politicheskoj zhizni sovremennoj Rossii]. In L. I. (eds.) Factors in the development of civil society and mechanisms of its interaction with the state [Faktory razvitiya grazhdanskogo obshchestva i mekhanizmy ego vzai-modejstviya s gosudarstvom]. Moscow: Vershina, pp. 209–236. (In Russ.)].
Петрова, Л. А., Сунгуров, А. Ю. (2012) ‘Ин-ституты-посредники между органами власти и обществом: Случай Санкт-Петер¬бурга’, Вопросы государственно-го и муниципального управления, (2), сс. 78–96. [Petrova, L. A., Sungurov, A. Y. (2012) ‘Mediators Institutes between Government and Society: Case of Saint- Petersburg’ [Instituty-posredniki mezhdu organami vlasti i obshchestvom: Sluchaj Sankt-Peterburga], Public Administration Issues, (2), pp. 78–96. (In Russ.)].
Руденко, В. Н. (2007) ‘Консультативные обще-ственные советы в системе делибера-тивной демократии’, Сравнительное конституционное обозрение, 4, сс. 118–125. [Rudenko, V. N. (2007) ‘Consulta-tive public councils in the system of de-liberative democracy’ [Konsul'tativnye obshhestvennye sovety v sisteme deliber-ativnoj demokratii], Sravnitel'noe kon-stitucionnoe obozrenie, 4, pp. 118–125. (In Russ.)]
Сулимов, К. А. (2018) ‘Системы консультатив-но-совещательных органов в современ-ной России как институциональные условия соуправления: между унифи-кацией и разнообразием’, Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: По-литология, 1, сс. 5–23. [Sulimov, K. A. (2018) ‘Systems of Consultative and Ad-visory Bodies in Contemporary Russia as Institutional Conditions for Co-Governance: Between Unification and Diversity’ [Sistemy konsul'tativno-sove-shchatel'nykh organov v sovremennoi Rossii kak institutsional'nye usloviya soupravleniya: mezhdu unifikatsiei i raznoobraziem], Vestnik Permskogo uni-versiteta. Seriya: Politologiya, 1, pp. 5–23. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2018-1-5-23
Сунгуров, А. Ю., Дубровский, Д. В., Каря-гин, М. Е., Тиняков, Д. К (2020) ‘Об-щественно-консультативные советы как форма вовлечения экспертного знания в процесс политико-управленческих решений (на примере г. Санкт-Петер¬бурга)’, Вопросы госу-дарственного и муниципального управ-ления, 2, сс. 7–31. [Sungurov, A. Y., Dubrovsky, D. V., Karyagin, M. E., Tiniakov, D. K (2020) ‘Public Consulata-tive Councils as a Way of Involving Ex-pert Knowledge in Policy Decision Pro-cess (Case of St. Petersburg)’ [Ob-shchestvenno-konsul'tativnye sovety kak forma vovlecheniya ekspertnogo znaniya v process politiko-upravlen¬cheskih resh-enij (na primere g. Sankt-Peterburga)], Public Administration Issues, 2, pp. 7–31. (In Russ.)] .
Тарасенко, А., Дубровский, Д., Стародуб-цев, А. (2011) Навести мосты между обществом и государством: обще-ственно-консультативные структуры в регионах Северо-Запада. Санкт-Петербург: Реноме. [Tarasenko, A., Du-brovskij, D., Staro¬dubcev, A. (2011) Building bridges between society and the state: public advisory structures in the re-gions of the North-West [Navesti mosty mezhdu obshhestvom i gosudarstvom: obshhestvenno-konsul'ta¬tiv¬nye struktury v regionah Severo-Zapada]. Sankt-Peterburg: Renome. (In Russ.)] .
Турцева, К. П. (2023) ‘«Экспертная сбаланси-рованность» в общественных экологи-ческих советах регионов России’, Ars Admi¬nistrandi, 3 (15), сс. 471–494. [Turtseva, Ch. P. (2023), ‘“Fair balance” in the Russian regional public environ-mental councils’ [Jekspertnaja sbalan-sirovannost' v obshhestvennyh jekologicheskih sovetah regionov Rossii], Ars Administrandi, 3 (15), pp. 471–494. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2023-3-471-494.
Шамшура, К. А. (2023) ‘Общественно-консуль-та¬тивные советы по вопросам культур-ного наследия в российских регионах: информационная открытость и персо-нальный состав’, Вестник Томского госу¬дарственного университета, 494, сс. 115–124. [Shamshura, K.A. (2023) ‘Public advisory councils for cultural her-itage in the Russian regions: Information openness and composition’ [Ob-shhestvenno-konsul'tativnye sovety po voprosam kul'turnogo nasledija v ros-sijskih regionah: informacionnaja otkry-tost' i personal'nyj sostav], Tomsk State University Journal, 494, pp. 115–124. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/494/12
Guston, D. H. (2001) ‘Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an in-troduction’, Science, technology & human values, 26 (4), pp. 399-408.
Knox, C., Janenova, S. (2017) ‘Public councils in Kazakhstan: a case of emergent participa-tive democracy?’, Central Asian Survey, 2 (37), pp. 305–321. DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2017.1410467
Lee, A. K. (2016) ‘Heritage conservation and ad-vocacy coalitions: the state-society con-flict in the case of the Enning Road rede-velopment project in Guangzhou’, Inter-national Journal of Heritage Studies, 22 (9), pp. 729–747.
McCarthy L.A, Stolerman K.A, Tikhomirov A.V. (2020) ‘Managed Civil Society and Police Oversight in Russia: Regional Police-Public Councils’, Europe-Asia Studies, 9 (72), pp. 1498–1522. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1832964
Mozaffari, A. (2015) ‘The heritage ‘NGO’: A case study on the role of grass roots her-itage societies in Iran and their percep-tion of cultural heritage’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21 (9), pp. 845–861.
Owen C., Bindman E. (2019) ‘Civic Participation in a Hybrid Regime: Limited Pluralism in Policymaking and Delivery in Contempo-rary Russia’, Government and Opposition, 1 (54), pp. 98–120. DOI:10.1017/gov.2017.13
Petrov, N., Lipman, M., Hale, H. E. (2014) ‘Three dilemmas of hybrid regime gov-ernance: Russia from Putin to Putin’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 30 (1), pp. 1–26 .
Pollock-Ellwand, N. (1992) ‘Heritage Advocacy in the Cultural Landscape’, APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology, 24 (3/4), pp. 71–78.
Sabatier, P. A., Weible, C. M. (2007) ‘The Advo-cacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications’, in Sabatier, P. A. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder; Colo: Westview Press, pp. 189–220.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.
