SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND VALUES AS PREDICTORS OF PROTEST PARTICIPATION IN REGIONS OF RUSSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-3-69-78Keywords:
political participation; protest participation; subjective well-being; happiness; life satisfaction; postmaterial values; value orientation; survival values; self-expression valuesAbstract
Political protest is an important indicator of political conflict in a society. Prior to the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, there was a worldwide trend of increasing protest activity. Russia was not left aside from the global trend. According to polls, the level of protest sentiment increased in 2019. Researchers, politicians and the entire global community was faced with the issue of protests as a widespread phenomenon, including the causes and factors that influence the increase in the number of protests. This paper studies the influence of such factors of protest participation as subjective well-being, values, and the level of economic development of the region. The database includes 11045 respondents from 36 regions of Russia. The survey was conducted in 2018. Using multilevel regression on the survey data, the author concludes that respondents with post-material values and those living in wealthier regions are more likely to participate in protests. Subjective well-being has no statistically significant correlation with participation in protests.References
Гусейнов, А. Ш., Рябикина, З. И., Фоменко, Г. Ю., Шиповская, В. В. (2018) ‘Феномен протестной активности личности: субъектно-бытийная интерпретация’, Российский психологический журнал, 14 (4), сс. 78–96. [Gusejnov, A. Sh., Rjabikina, Z. I., Fomenko, G. Ju., Shipovskaja, V. V. (2018) ‘The phenomenon of protest activity of the individual: subjective-existential interpretation’ [Fenomen protestnoj aktivnosti lichnosti: subektno-bytijnaja interpretacija], Rossijskij psi-hologicheskij zhurnal, 14 (4). pp. 78–96. (In Russ.)].
Камалов, Э., Понарин, Э. (2020) ‘Националь-ная гордость и субъективное благопо-лучие россиян’, Мониторинг обще-ственного мнения: экономические и со-циальные перемены, 1, cc. 177–205. [Kamalov, E., Ponarin, E. (2020) ‘Na-tional pride and subjective well-being of Russians’ [Nacional'naya gordost' i sub"ektivnoe blagopoluchie rossiyan], Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny, 1, pp. 177–205. (In Russ.)].
Люлька О. Ф. (2015) ‘Протестная активность в России: общенациональные тенденции и региональная специфика’, Государ-ст¬венное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки, 4, сс. 218–226. [Lyul'ka O. F. (2015) ‘Protest activity in Russia: national trends and regional specific’ [Protestnaya aktivnost' v rossii: ob-shchenacional'nye tendencii i region-al'naya specifika], Gosudarstvennoe i mu-nicipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski, 4, pp. 218–226. (In Russ.)].
Социальный портрет протестного движения в Москве (2012) ВЦИОМ. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/ana¬li-ti¬cheskii-obzor/soczialnyj-portret-protest-no¬go-dvizheniya-v-moskve (дата обра-щения: 20.03.2024) [Social portrait of the protest movement in Moscow (2012) [Sotsial'nyi portret protestnogo dvizheni-ya v Moskve] WCIOM. Available at: https://wciom.ru/
analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/soczial¬nyj-portret-pro¬test¬nogo-dvizheniya-v-moskve (accessed: 20.03.2024)].
Abdullah, F. H. (2020) ‘Revolution in Egypt: Political Movements and Mobilisation of Resources’. Insight on Africa, 12 (1), pp.7–28.
Ayanian, A. H., & Tausch, N. (2016). ‘How risk perception shapes collective action inten-tions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post-coup uprising’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 55 (4), pp. 700–721. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12164
Booth, D. (2017) ‘Postmaterialism and Support for the Environment in the United States’, Society & Natural Resources, pp. 1401–1420.
Clark, W., Golder, M., & Golder, S. (2017) ‘The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay: An Exit, Voice and Loyalty Model of Pol-itics’, British Journal of Political Science, 47 (4), pp. 719–748. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123416000442
De Weerd, M., Klandermans, B. (1999) ‘Group identification and political protest: Farm-ers’ protest in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, pp. 1073–1095.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002) ‘Sub-jective well-being: The science of happi-ness and life satisfaction’. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press.
Fujita, F. (2008) ‘The Frequency of Social Com-parison and its Relation to Subjective’. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.). The science of subjective well-being. The Guilford Press.
Grasso, M. T., Giugni, M. (2016) Protest, Social Movements, and Global Democracy since 2011: New Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing.
Gurr, T. (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Henn, M., Oldfield B. and Hart J. (2018) ‘Post-materialism and young people's political participation in a time of austerity’, BJS, pp. 712–737.
Hirschman, A., Rothschild, M. (1973) ‘The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 4 (84), pp. 544–566.
Huntington, S. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Inglehart, R., Abramson, P. R. (1999) ‘Measuring Postmaterialism’, American Political Sci-ence Review, 93 (3), pp. 665–677. DOI: 10.2307/2585581.
Inglehart, R. (2018) Cultural Evolution: People's Motivations are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
Inglehart, R. (2002) ‘Gender, Aging, and Subjec-tive Well-Being’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43 (3-5), pp. 391–408.
Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., Welzel, C. (2008) ‘Development, freedom, and ris-ing happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007)’, Perspectives on Psycholog-ical Science, 3 (4), pp. 264–28.
Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cam-bridge University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton Uni-versity Press.
Jenkins, R. (2004) Social Identity. Abingdon: Routledge.
Jian-Hua, Z., Stanley, R. (1993) ‘From discon-tent to protest: Individual-level causes of the 1989 pro-democracy movement in China’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, pp. 234–249.
Kuran, T. (1991) ‘The East European Revolution of 1989: Is it Surprising that We Were Surprised?’, The American Economic Re-view, 2 (81).
Lankina, T., Tertytchnaya, K. (2020) Protest in electoral autocracies: a new dataset’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 1 (36), pp. 20–36.
Lankina, T., Voznaya, A. (2015) ‘New Data on Protest Trends in Russia's Regions’, Eu-rope-Asia Studies, 68 (2).
Lipset, S. (1959) ‘Some Social Requisites of De-mocracy’, American Political Science Re-view, 1 (53).
Lorenzini, J. (2015) ‘Subjective well- being and political participation: A comparison of unemployed and employed youth’, Jour-nal of Happiness Studies, 16 (2), pp. 381–404.
McAllister, I., Mughan, A. (1983) ‘Values, Pro-test and Minority Nationalism in Wales’, British Journal of Political Science, pp. 230–243.
Morrison, M., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011) ‘Sub-jective well-being and national satisfac-tion: findings from a worldwide survey’, Psychological science, 22 (2), pp. 166–171. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610396224
Opp, Karl-Dieter. (2009) Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements: A Multi-disciplinary Introduction, Critique, and Synthesis. Routlegde.
Ponarin E., Komin M. (2018) ‘The Russian Elite’s Imperial Nationalism and the Rus-sian Society: The Emergence of a Grand Consensus’, Sociology Compass, 12.
Power, S. A., Madsen, T., & Morton, T. A. (2020). ‘Relative deprivation and revolt: current and future directions’, Current opinion in psychology, 35, pp. 119–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.010
Reeskens T., Wright T. (2011) ‘Subjective Well-Being and National Satisfaction: Taking Seriously the “Proud of What?” Ques-tion’, Psychological Science, 22 (11), pp. 1460–1462.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). ‘On happiness and human potentials: A review of re-search on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being’, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp. 141–166. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Smelser, N. J. (1963) Theory of collective behav-ior. The free press of Glencoe.
Sokolov, V. A., Zagrebin, V. V. (2015) ‘Social protest in the context of the Russian re-gion’, Socialʹnye i gumanitarnye znania, 2 (5).
Stryke, S., Owens T.J., White, R.W. (2000) Self, Identity, and Social Movements. Minne-apolis. University of Minnesota Press.
Tarrow, S. (1994) Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Tekinalp, S. (2016) ‘Value Priority and Humor as a Defense to Cultural Schism: Analysis of Istanbul Gezi Park Protest’, Interna-tional Journal of Communication.
Tilly, C. (2004) Social Movements. Boulder: Para-digm Publishers.
Turner J. C., Tajfel H. (1986) ‘The Social Identi-ty Theory of Intergroup Behavior’. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psy-chology: Key readings.
van Leeuwen, A., van Stekelenburg, J., Klan-dermans, B. (2016) ‘The phenomenology of pro¬test atmosphere: A demonstrator perspe¬ctive’, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.,46, pp. 44–62.
van Stekelenburg J. (2013), ‘The Political Psy-chology of Protest’, European Psycholo-gist, pp. 224–234. DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000156
van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B. (2017) ‘Individuals in Movements: A Social Psychology of Contention’. In Rogge-band, C., Klander¬mans, B. (eds) Hand-book of Social Movements Across Disci-plines. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham.
Weitz-Shapiro, R., Winters, M. S. (2010) ‘The Link between Voting and Life Satisfac-tion in Latin America’, Latin American Politics and Society, 53 (4), pp. 101–126. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1702969
Welzel, C., Inglehart, R. (2008) ‘The Role of Or-dinary People in Democratization’, Euro-pean Journal of Political Research, 6 (45).
Welzel, C. (2013) Freedom Rising: Human Em-powerment and the Quest for Emancipa-tion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Welzel, C., Deutsch, F. (2012) ‘Emancipative Values and Non-Violent Protest: The Im-portance of ‘Ecological’ Effects’, British Journal of Political Science, pp. 465–473.
Witte, C. T. and Burger, M. J. and Ianchovichi-na, E. (2019). ‘Subjective Well-Being and Peaceful Uprisings’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8705, Avail-able at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3317211
Zavadskaya, M., Welzel, C. (2014) ‘Subverting autocracy: emancipative mass values in competitive authoritarian regimes’, De-mocratization, 22 (6), pp. 1105–1130.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.