COMMON AND SPECIFIC IN APPROACHES TO ENSURING SOCIETAL SECURITY AS CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN THE EU AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-3-56-64

Keywords:

pandemic; societal security; crisis management; Czech Republic; European Union

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic was a challenge for the EU as an integration association and for all its member states. To counteract the cross-border crisis triggered by the coronavirus, policies within the association and the interaction of member states had to be clearly coordinated. In reality, however, the approaches taken by member states to deal with the pandemic differed at almost every stage of it. An example of that was the Czech Republic and its unique approach to a significant number of aspects of crisis management. Using the concept of societal security as a theoretical basis, the article analyzes the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic to the EU, revealing the specifics of the Czech Republic's approach to crisis management (in comparison with the general European approach), and analyzing the public perception of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related crisis management policies at the EU and Czech Republic levels. It is concluded that the peculiarities of the approach to social security in the Czech Republic are primarily due to the peculiarities of the perception of the coronavirus as a threat, as well as to the anti-crisis policies implemented at the Czech and EU levels.

Author Biography

V. А. Gatskovskaya, HSE University, Russia, Moscow

graduate student

References

Бабынина, Л. О. (2020) ‘Коронавирус: что может сделать и делает Европейский союз’, Аналитические записки ИЕ РАН, (12 (195)) [электронное издание]. URL: http://www.instituteofeurope.ru/images/uploads/analitika/2020/an195.pdf (дата обращения: 20 декабря 2022) [Babynina, L. О. (2020) ‘Coronavirus: what the European Union can and is doing’ [Koronavirus: chto mozhet sdelat' I delaet Evropeiskii soyuz], Analitycalpapers of IE RAS, 12 (195). Available at: URL: http://www.instituteofeurope.ru/images/uploads/analitika/2020/an195.pdf (Accessed: 20th December 2020)]. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15211/analytics122020.

Потемкина, О. Ю. (2020) ‘ЕС на пути к союзу здравоохранения’, Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН, 6, сс. 32‒38. [Potemkina, O. (2020) ‘EU on the way toward Health Union’ [ES na puti k so-yuzu zdravookhraneniya], Scientific and An-alytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS, 6, pp. 32‒38. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran620203238.

Шишелина, Л. Н. (2021) ‘Опыт Вишеградских стран в борьбе с пандемией’, Научно-аналитический вестник Института Ев-ропы РАН, 1, сс. 111‒117. [Shishelina, L. (2021) ‘Experience of the Visegrad Coun-tries in the Fight against the Pandemic’ [Opyt Vishegradskikh stran v bor'be s pan-demiei], Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS, 1, pp. 111‒117. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran12021111117.

Энтин, М. Л. (2020) ‘Безальтернативный характер развития ЕС’, Современная Европа, 4, сс. 25‒36. [Entin, M. (2020) ‘Unalternative Character of EU Development’ [Bezal'ternativnyi kharakter razvitiya ES], Contempo-rary Europe, 4, pp. 25‒36. (In Russ.)].

DOI: 10.15211/soveurope420202536.

Buštíková, L. and Baboš, P. (2020) ‘Best in Covid: Populists in the time of pandemic’, Politics and Governance, 8(4), pp. 496‒508,DOI: 10.17645/PAG.V8I4.3424.

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., and De Wilde, J. (1998) Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Ferrera, M., Miró, J. and Ronchi, S. (2021) ‘Walking the road together? EU polity maintenance during the COVID-19 crisis’, West European Politics, 44, pp. 1329‒1352, DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1905328.

Guasti, P. (2020) ‘The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in Central and Eastern Europe: The rise of autocracy and democratic resilience’, Democratic theory, 7(2), pp. 47‒60, DOI: 10.3167/dt.2020.070207.

Kazarinova, D. V. (2022) ‘Understanding the Infodemic of Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories’, Russia in Global Affairs, 20(2), pp. 83‒104, DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-2-83-104.

Lægreid, P., and Rykkja, L. H. (eds.) (2018) Societal Security and Crisis Management: Governance Capacity and Legitimacy. Springer.

Nemec, J., Maly, I. and Chubarova, T. (2021) ‘Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and potential outcomes in Central and East-ern Europe: Comparing the Czech Republic, the Russian Federation, and the Slovak Re-public’, Journal of Comparative Policy Anal-ysis: Research and Practice, 23(2), pp. 282‒290, DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2021.1878884.

Roe, P. (2004) Ethnic violence and the societal secu-rity dilemma. Routledge.

Roe, P. (2016) ‘Societal security’ in: Collins, A., (ed.) Contemporary security studies. Oxford University Press, pp. 233‒247.

Urbanovics, A., Sasvári, P. and Teleki, B. ‘Evalua-tion of the COVID-19 regulations in the Visegrad group’, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), pp. 645‒657, DOI: 10.1108/TG-08-2020-0228

Waever, O. (1995) ‘Identity, integration and security: Solving the sovereignty puzzle in EU studies’, Journal of international affairs, 48(2), pp. 389‒431.

Wæver, O. (2008) ‘The changing agenda of societal security’. In: Brauch, H. G. (ed.) Globalization and environmental challenges. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 581‒593.

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Gatskovskaya В. А. (2023). COMMON AND SPECIFIC IN APPROACHES TO ENSURING SOCIETAL SECURITY AS CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN THE EU AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-3-56-64