FOREIGN POLICY EXPERTISE: THE RESEARCH POTENTIAL OF CRITICAL GEOPOLITICS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-3-77-85

Keywords:

foreign policy expertise; critical geopolitics; geopolitical discourse; expert geopolitical discourse

Abstract

The author determines the possibilities of using the theoretical and methodological apparatus of critical geopolitics to study foreign policy expertise. Accordingly, the key views of scientists specializing in the field of critical geopolitics on the problems of foreign policy expertise were summarized and systematized; the concept of critical geopolitics by G. O'Tuathail was expanded and supplemented; the significance of foreign policy expertise at various levels of geopolitical discourse was analyzed; the author's definition was proposed and the features of expert geopolitical discourse were established, its types determined. Consequently, it was substantiated that foreign policy expertise may be a network-organized set of actors in geopolitical discourse. By virtue of their expert status, they have the ability to decisively influence the geopolitical ideas of the population and political actors, alongside the process of the political decision-making process in the field of foreign policy, defense and security. The study determined that the subjects of foreign policy expertise act at all major levels of geopolitical discourse, forming its separate direction – expert geopolitical discourse. Within its framework, they form both ideological and theoretical, conceptual, as well as applied and popular geopolitical ideas that make up the geopolitical pictures of the world of ordinary citizens and the political elite.

Author Biography

O. V. Onopko, Donetsk National University

Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor

References

Богатуров, А. Д., Косолапов, Н. А., Хрусталёв, М. А. (2002) Очерки теории и политического анализа международных от-ношений. Москва: Научно-образоват. форум по междунар. отношениям, [Bogaturov, A. D., Kosolapov, N. A., Khrustalev, M. A. (2002) Essays on the theory and political analysis of international relations [Ocherki teorii i politicheskogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii]. Moscow: Nauchno-obrazovat. forum po mezhdunar. оtnosheniyam. (In Russ.)].

Войтоловский, Ф. Г. (2016) Тенденции развития глобального рынка внешнеполитической экспертизы: Тезисы доклада к заседанию Ученого совета ИМЭМО РАН 13 апреля 2016 г. [электронное издание]. URL: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/sc/2016/13042016/13042016-TEZ-SC.pdf (дата обращения: 01.11.2021). [Voitolovskii, F. G. (2016) ‘Trends in the development of the global market of foreign policy expertise: Abstract of the report for the meeting of the Academic Council of the IMEMO RAS on April 13, 2016’ [Ten-dentsii razvitiya global'nogo rynka vneshnepoliticheskoi ekspertizy: Tezisy doklada k zasedaniyu Uchenogo soveta IMEMO RAN 13 aprelya 2016 g.] [online]. Available at: URL: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/sc/2016/13042016/13042016-TEZ-SC.pdf (Ac-cessed: 01.11.2021) (In Russ.)].

Колосов, В. А. (2011) ‘Критическая геополитика: основы концепции и опыт ее применения в России’, Политическая наука, 4, сс. 31–52. [Kolosov, V. A. (2011) ‘Critical geopolitics: main concepts and field experience in Russia’ [Kriticheskaya geopolitika: osnovy kontseptsii i opyt ee primeneniya v Rossii], Political science, 4, pp. 31–52. (In Russ.)].

Макарычев, А. С. (1991) Экспертное обеспечение латиноамериканского курса США (период президентства Р. Рейгана): автореф. дис. … канд. ист. наук. Нижний Новгород. [Makarychev, A. S. (1991) ‘Expert support of the US Latin American course (R. Reagan's presiden-cy)’ [Ekspertnoe obespechenie latino-amerikanskogo kursa SShA (period pre-zidentstva R. Reigana)]. Cand. Sc. Diss. (Hist.). Nizhny Novgorod. (In Russ.)].

Окунев, И. Ю. (2012) ‘Критическая геополитика и посткритический сдвиг в исследовательской парадигме геополитики’, Культурная и гуманитарная география, 1(2), сс. 152–158. [Okunev, I. Yu. (2012) ‘Critical geopolitics and postcritical shift in geopolitical research paradigm’ [Kriticheskaya geopolitika i postkriticheskii sdvig v issledovatel'skoi paradigme geopolitiki], Cultural Geography & Geo-humanities, 1(2), pp. 152–158. (In Russ.)].

Патрушев, С. В. (2001) ‘Институционализм в политической науке: Этапы, течения, идеи, проблемы’, Политическая наука, 2, сс. 149–189. [Patrushev, S. V. (2001) ‘Institutionalism in political science: stages, trends, ideas and problems’ [Institutsionalizm v politicheskoi nauke: etapy, techeniya, idei, problemy], Political science, 2, pp. 149–189. (In Russ.)].

Світова гібридна війна: український фронт (2017). Київ: НІСД. [World Hybrid War: Ukrainian Front (2017) [Svitova gibrydna vijna: ukrai'ns'kyj front]. Kiev: NISS. (In Ukr.)].

Хрусталёв, М. А. (2018) Анализ международных ситуаций и политическая экспертиза: очерки теории и методологии. Москва: МГИМО-НОФМО. [Khrustalev, M. A. (2018) Analysis of international situations and political expertise: essays on theory and methodology [Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii i politich-eskaya ekspertiza: ocherki teorii i metodologii]. Moscow: MGIMO-NOFMO. (In Russ.)].

Шевченко, И. С. (2007) ‘Речевой акт как единица дискурса: когнитивно-прагматический подход’, Тверской лингвистический меридиан, 7, сс. 69–80. [Shevchen-ko, I. S. (2007) ‘Speech act as a unit of discourse: a cognitive-pragmatic approach’ [Rechevoi akt kak edinitsa diskursa: kognitivno-pragmaticheskii podkhod], Tver linguistic meridian, 7, pp. 69–80. (In Russ.)].

Ярославцева Я. А. (2015) ‘Специфика внешне-политического дискурса’, Филология и культура, 4(42), сс. 185–191. [Yaroslavtseva, Ya. A. (2015) ‘Specificity of foreign policy discourse’ [Spetsifika vnesh-nepoliticheskogo diskursa], Philology and Culture, 4(42), pр. 185–191 (In Russ.)].

Coleman, M. (2013) ‘Intellectuals of statecraft’, The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics, рp. 493–508.

Dodds, K.-J. (1993) ‘Geopolitics, Experts and the Making of Foreign Policy’, Area, 25(1), рp. 70–74.

Dodds, K.-J. (1994) ‘Geopolitics and foreign policy: recent developments in Anglo-American political geography and international relations’, Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), pp. 186–208. DOI: 10.1177/030913259401800204.

Kurečić, P. (2015) ‘Identity and Discourse in Critical Geopolitics: A Framework for Analysis’, Society & Technology Book of Papers, 2, pp. 1–22.

Kuus, M. (2008) ‘Professionals of Geopolitics: Agency in International Politics’, Geography Compass, 2(6), pp. 2062–2079. DOI:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00172.x.

Longhini, A. (2015) ‘Institutionalization of Foreign Policy Think Tanks in Italy and in the UK: An Explanatory Framework’, Central European Journal of Public Poli-cy, 9(2), pp. 96–108. DOI: 10.1515/cejpp-2016-0014.

Miller, L. B. (1990) ‘American foreign policy: beyond containment?’, International Af-fairs, 66(2), pp. 313–324. DOI: 10.2307/2621336.

Tuathail, G. Ó. (1999) ‘Understanding Critical Geopolitics: Geopolitics and Risk Society’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 22, pp. 107–124. DOI: 10.1080/01402399908437756.

Tuathail, G. Ó., Agnew, J. (1992) ‘Geopolitics and discourse’, Political Geography, 11(2), pp. 190–204. DOI:10.1016/0962-6298(92)90048-x.

Published

2022-10-15

How to Cite

Onopko О. В. (2022). FOREIGN POLICY EXPERTISE: THE RESEARCH POTENTIAL OF CRITICAL GEOPOLITICS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-3-77-85

Issue

Section

Междисциплинарные ракурсы политических исследований