MACRO-REGIONS IN THE TERRITORIAL-POLITICAL DISCOURSE OF DEPUTIES OF THE STATE DUMA (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE URALS)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2021-4-146-157

Keywords:

Russia; State Duma; territorial image; macroregion, Ural; content analysis; discourse analysis; spatial de-velopment; state policy

Abstract

The article focuses on the discourse of the deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation on the macro-regions of Russia in relation to the provisions of the "Strategy of spatial development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025". The strategy introduces the concepts of "macro-regions", the "geostrategic territories" and the others. The strategy received a critical assessment for its declarative nature and preservation of the binding of macroregions to the grid of federal districts, the inconsistency of goals and meanings of spatial strategizing. It seems that one of the reasons for the unsatisfactory quality of the Strategy is the general discursive uncertainty and lack of clarity of the possible territorial development of the country in the views of the Russian political and administrative class, segment of which is the State Duma deputy corps. The analysis presented in the article tests this assumption on the material of the speeches of deputies at plenary sessions with references to Russian macroregions. The data set is a sample of transcripts that covers the period 2004‒2019 and includes about 150 thousand legislative speeches from more than 1000 deputies distributed among party factions and four convocations. The results of the analysis show the special attention of deputies to remote and border territories, first of all to the "Far East" and "North". This corresponds to the logic of allocating "geostrategic territories" in the Strategy. 

Author Biographies

M. V. Nazukina, Perm State University, Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor, Researcher

K. A. Sulimov, Perm State University

Candidate of Political Science, Head of the Department of Political Science

References

Анимица, Е. Г., Глумов, А. А. (2006) ‘Особенности и основные черты развития срединного региона (на примере Уральского экономического района)’, Известия Уральского государственного экономического университета, 4 (16), сс. 169–185. [Animitsa, E. G., Glumov, A. A. (2006) ‘Features and main features of the development of the middle region (on the example of the Ural economic re-gion)’ [Osobennosti i osnovnye cherty razvitiya sredinnogo regiona (na primere Ural'skogo ekonomicheskogo raiona)], Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 4 (16), pp. 169–185. (In Russ.)].

Белоусов, К. И., Лабутин, И. А., Рябинин, К. В., Сулимов, К. А. (2020) ‘«Депутатская картография» на материале стенограмм заседаний ГД РФ’, Вестник Пермского университета. Политология, 14 (4), сс. 138–152. [Bel-ousov, K. I., Labutin, I. A., Ryabinin, K. V., Sulimov, K. A. (2020) ‘«Deputies Cartography» on the material of the stenograms of the sittings of the State Duma’ [«Deputatskaya kartografiya» na materiale stenogramm zasedanii GD RF], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Sci-ence, 14 (4), pp. 138–152. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-4-138-152.

Бенц, Д. С. (2020) ‘Тренды развития Уральско-го макрорегиона’, Вестник Челябинского государственного университета, 2 (436), Экономические науки, вып. 68, сс. 92–101. [Benz, D. S. (2020) ‘Ural macroregion: the development trends of its subuects [Trendy razvitiya Ural'skogo makroregiona], Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2 (436), Economic Sci-ences, iss. 68, pp. 92–101. (In Russ.)].

Блануца, В. Б. (2020) ‘Перспективы пространственного развития геостратегических территорий Российской Федерации’, Вестник Пермского университета. Политология, 14 (4), cc. 27–38. [Blanutsa, V. B. (2020) ‘Spatial development pro-spects for geostrategic territories of the Russian Federation’ [Perspektivy pros-transtvennogo razvitiya geostrate-gicheskikh territorii Rossiiskoi Feda-ratsii], Bulletin of Perm University. Politi-cal Science, 14 (4), pp. 27–38. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-4-27-38.

Иванов, О. Б., Бухвальд, Е. М. (2021) ‘Стратегия пространственного развития и основные направления ее актуализации’, ЭТАП: экономическая теория, анализ, практика, 1, cc. 7–23. [Ivanov, O. B., Bukhvald, E. M. (2021) ‘Strategy of spa-tial development and the main directions of its actualization’ [Strategiya pros-transtvennogo razvitiya i osnovnye napravleniya ee aktualizatsii], ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice, 1, pp. 7–23. (In Russ.)].

Кузнецова, О. В. (2019) ‘Стратегия пространственного развития Российской Феде-рации: иллюзия решений и реальность проблем’, Пространственная экономика, 15 (4), cc. 107–125. [Kuznetsova, O. V. (2019) ‘Problems of Elaboration of Spatial Development Strategy of the Rus-sian Federation’ [Strategiya pros-transtvennogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Feder-atsii: illyuziya reshenii i real'nost' prob-lem], Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 15 (4), pp. 107–125. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.4.107-125

Лексин, В. Н. (2019) ‘Дороги, которые не мы выбираем (о правительственной "Стратегии пространственного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года")’, Российский экономический журнал, 3, cc. 3–24. [Leksin, V. N. (2019) ‘The roads that we do not choose (on the government «Strategy of spatial development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025»)’ [Dorogi, ko-torye ne my vybiraem (o pravitel'stven-noi" Strategii prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2025 goda")], Russian Economic Journal, 3, pp. 3–24. (In Russ.)].

Матвеев, А. К. (1961) ‘О происхождении названия "Урал"’, Вопросы истории Урала, вып. 39, ч. 1, Свердловск, Ученые записки Уральского государственного университета, cc. 25–30. [Matveev, A. K. (1961) ‘About the origin of the name“ Ural”’ [O proiskhozhdenii nazvaniya "Ural"], Voprosy istorii Urala, 39 (1), Sverdlovsk, Uchenye zapiski Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universi-teta, pp. 25–30. (In Russ.)].

Назукина, М. В., Сулимов, К. А. (2021) ‘К измерению образа будущего в дискурсе депутатов Государственной Думы (на примере территориально-политических представлений)’, Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 13 (1), сс. 1–18. [Nazukina, M. V. and Sulimov, K. A. (2021) ‘On measuring the image of the future in the discourse of the Russian State Duma deputies (as based on territo-rial-political representations)’ [K izme-reniyu obraza budushchego v diskurse deputatov Gosudarstvennoi Dumy (na primere territorial'no-politicheskikh pred-stavlenii], Ars Administrandi, 13 (1), pp. 1–18. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2021-1-1-18.

Назукина, М. В. (2015) ‘Уральский макрорегион в системе территориальных идентичностей современной России’, Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая, 6, cc. 37–47. [Nazukina, M. V. (2015) ‘Urals Macroregion in the System of Territorial Identities of Modern Russia’ [Ural'skii makroregion v sisteme territorial'nykh identichnostei sovremen-noi Rossii], Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 6, pp. 37–47. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.15356/0373-2444-2015-6-37-47.

Татаркин, А. И. (2005) ‘Социально-экономический статус срединного региона России’, Экономика региона, 2, сс. 5–22. [Tatarkin, A. I. (2005) ‘Socio-economic status of the middle region of Russia’ [Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskii status sredinnogo regiona Rossii], Ekonomika regiona, 2, pp. 5–22. (In Russ.)].

White, M. D., Marsh, E. E. (2006) ‘Content analysis: A flexible methodology’, Li-brary Trends, 55 (1), pp. 35‒36. DOI: 10.1353/lib.2006.0053.

Published

2022-02-12

How to Cite

Nazukina М. В., & Sulimov К. А. (2022). MACRO-REGIONS IN THE TERRITORIAL-POLITICAL DISCOURSE OF DEPUTIES OF THE STATE DUMA (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE URALS). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2021-4-146-157