DO REGIONAL PARTIES MATTER? FACTORS OF ACTIVITY OF EUROREGIONS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2021-4-49-62

Keywords:

Euroregion; region; regionalist party; multilevel governance; European Union

Abstract

The article tests the hypothesis on the relation between the presence of a strong regionalist party in regions of the European Union, which are the parts of Euroregions, and the activity quality of these Euroregional unions. The paper also analyzes the role of other factors of Euroregions' cooperation such as the presence of governance institutions, the level of interpersonal trust, and perception of socio-economic differences between Euroregions' members. The theory is tested on data for 162 Euroregions of the European Union. The results show that the presence of a strong regionalists party at least in one region which is a part of the Euroregion significantly increases the odds of the latter being active. Another significant factor of the Euroregion's activity is the adoption of the status of the European group of territorial cooperation (EGTC). Moreover, the significant factor of the Euroregion’s activity is the number of members, which signed an agreement establishing a Euroregion. It is notable that a higher number of Euroregion's members increases the odds of it being active. At the same time, the level of interpersonal trust and perception of socio-economic differences among Euroregional members don't affect the diversity of Euroregional activity. 

Author Biographies

A. I. Gileva, Perm State University, European University at St. Petersburg

graduate of the magistracy of the Department of Political Science, postgraduate student at the Faculty of Political Science

I. K. Shevtsova, Perm Federal Research Center URAN, Perm State University

Candidate of Political Sciences, Researcher

References

База данных ‘Субнациональный регионализм и многоуровневая политика’ [электронное издание]. URL: http://identityworld.ru/index/srdmp/0-25#tab5 [Database ‘Subnational regionalism and multilevel governance’ [Subnational’ny regionalism i mnogourovnevaya politika] [online]. URL: http://identityworld.ru/index/srdmp/0-25#tab5].

Бусыгина, И. М., Филиппов, М. Г. (2020) ‘Изменение стимулов и стратегий национальных правительств в условиях многоуровневого управления в Европейском союзе’, Полис, (5), сс. 148–163. [Busygina, I. M., Filippov, M. G. (2020) ‘The change in the stimulus and strate-gies of national governments in European Union’s multilevel governance’ [Iz-menenie stimulov i strategii natsion-al'nykh pravitel'stv v usloviyakh mnog-ourovnevogo upravleniya v Evropeiskom soyuze], Polis: Journal of Political Stud-ies, (5), pр 148–163. (In Russ.)].

Зубаревич, Н. (2011) ‘Регионы и города Рос-сии: сценарии 2020’, «Pro et Contra». [Zubarevich, N. (2011) ‘Regions and cit-ies of Russia: scenarios 2020’ [Regiony i goroda Rossii: scenarii 2020], «Pro et Contra» (In Russ.)].

Полищук, Л. (2014) Порознь или сообща. Социальный капитал в развитии городов. Strelka Press. [Polishyk, L. (2014) Apart or or together. Social capital in urban de-velopment. [Porozn ili soobscha. So-cial’nyi capital v razvitii gorodov]. Strel-ka Press. (In Russ.)].

Bauer, M., Börzel, T. (2010) ‘Regions and the European Union’ in: Enderlein, H., Wäl-ti, S. and Zürn, M. (eds.) Handbook on Multi-level Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 253–263.

Beck, J. (2018) ‘Cross-Border Cooperation: Chal-lenges and Perspectives for the Horizon-tal Dimension of European Integration’, Administrative consulting, 1(2018), pр. 56–62. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-1-56-62.

Bouvet, F., Dall’erba, S. (2010) ‘European Re-gional Structural Funds: How Large is the Influence of Politics on the Alloca-tion Process?’, JCMS: Journal of Com-mon Market Studies, 48, pр. 501–528. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02062.x.

Brancati, D. (2006) ‘Decentralization: Fueling the Fire or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism?’, In-ternational Organization. Cambridge University Press, 60(3), pр. 651–685. DOI: 10.1017/S002081830606019X.

De Sousa, L. (2013), ‘Understanding European Cross-border Cooperation: A Framework for Analysis’, Journal of European Inte-gration, 35(6), pр. 669–687. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2012.711827.

Durà, A., Camonita, F., Berzi, M., Noferini, A. (2018) ‘Euroregions, Excellence and In-novation across EU borders. A Catalogue of Good Practices’, Barcelona, Depart-ment of Geography, UAB, 254 p.

Evrard, E. (2016) ‘The European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): Towards a Supraregional Scale of Governance in the Greater Region SaarLorLux?’, Geo-politics, 21(3), рp. 513–537. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2015.1104667.

European Commission (2000) Practical guide to Cross-Border Cooperation. 3rd edn., As-sociation of European Border Regions (AEBR), Gronau.

European Parliament (2006) European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) [online]. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/egtc/ (Accessed: 19 October 2021).

European Parliament and Council of Ministers (2006) Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation, OJ L, 210, 31 Ju-ly 2006, [online]. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/egtc/.

Eurostat [online]. Available at: URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (Accessed: 18 October 2021).

Eurorégion Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Euskadi, Navarre [online]. Available at: URL: https://www.euroregion-naen.eu (Ac-cessed: 17 October 2021).

Flash Eurobarometer 422: Cross-border coopera-tion in the EU [online] Available at: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s1565_422_eng?locale=en (Accessed: 18 Octo-ber 2021).

Hájek O., Novosák J., Nekolová J., Smékalová L. (2016) ‘Distribution of structural funds: equity, efficiency and public procurement (Czech Republic)’, Journal of Interna-tional Studies, 9(1), pp. 167–179. DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/12.

Hodson, D. (2012). Regional and structural funds. In The Oxford Handbook of the European Union.

Hosny, A. S. (2013) ‘Theories of Economic Inte-gration: a Survey of the Economic and Political Literature’, International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sci-ences, 2 (5), pp. 133–155.

Högenauer, A.-L. (2014) ‘All by themselves? Legislative regions and the use of unme-diated access to the European level’, Eu-ropean Political Science Review, 6(3), pp. 451–475.

Jolly, S. K. (2007) ‘The Europhile Fringe?: Re-gionalist Party Support for European In-tegration’, European Union Politics, 8(1), pp. 109‒130. DOI: 10.1177/1465116507073290.

Keating, M., Hooghe, L., Tatham, M. (2015) ‘Bypassing the nation state? Regions and the EU policy process’ in JJ Richardson and S Mazey (eds), European Union: Power and Policy Making. Routledge, London, pp. 445–466.

Lüer, C., Hsiung, C., Montán, A., Hans, S., Le Moglie, P., Zillmer, S., Carius de Barros, K., (2018) EGTC monitoring report 2017 [online]. Available at: URL: 10.2863/506306.

Marks, G., Wilson, C. (2000) ‘The Past in the Present: A Cleavage Theory of Party Re-sponse to European Integration’, British Journal of Political Science, 30(3), pp. 433‒459. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400000181.

Medeiros, E. (2018) ‘Should EU cross-border co-operation programmes focus mainly on reducing border obstacles?’, Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica, 64(3), pp. 467–491. DOI: 10.1080/00343400600868937.

Noferini, A., Berzi, M., Camonita, F., Durà, A. (2020) ‘Cross-border cooperation in the EU: Euroregions amid multilevel govern-ance and re-territorialization’, European Planning Studies, 28(1), pp. 35–56. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1623973.

Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Ac-tion. The Political Economy of Institu-tions and Decisions, Cambridge, Cam-bridge University Press.

Perkmann, M. (2007) ‘Construction of New Ter-ritorial Scales: A Framework and Case Study of the EUREGIO Cross-border Re-gion’, Regional Studies, 41, pp. 253–266. DOI: 10.1080/00343400600990517.

Pikner, T. (2008) ‘Reorganizing Cross-Border Governance Capacity: The Case of the Helsinki-Tallinn Euregio’, European Ur-ban and Regional Studies, 15 (3), pp. 211‒227. DOI: 10.1177/0969776408090414.

Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Prince-ton: Princeton University Press.

Svensson, S. (2013) Social Capital and Govern-ance in European Borderlands: A Com-parative Study of Euroregions as Policy Actors. PhD thesis. Budapest: Central European University Thesis collection.

The European Communities (2007) Cohesion policy 2007–2013. Commentaries and of-ficial texts [online] Available at: URL: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/regulation/pdf/2007/publications/guide2007_en.pdf (Accessed: 19 October 2021).

Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino Euroregion [online]. URL: http://www.europaregion.info/de/satzung-und-organe.asp (Accessed: 17 Oc-tober 2021).

Wassenberg, B., Reitel, B., Peyrony, J. (2015) Territorial Cooperation in Europe - A His-torical Perspective. Brussels.

Published

2022-02-12

How to Cite

Gileva А. И., & Shevtsova И. К. (2022). DO REGIONAL PARTIES MATTER? FACTORS OF ACTIVITY OF EUROREGIONS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2021-4-49-62

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies