IT IS HARD TO BE AN EXPERT: NARROWING “A REASONABLE RANGE OF POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2021-3-97-102

Keywords:

experts; analytics; think tanks; analytical centers; competence; power; expertise; ideas; evaluation

Abstract

Expert and analytical activity act as an object of research in various fields and scientific directions. Differ-ent dimensions matter: institutional parameters, personal and subjective ones. The author characterizes contemporary scientific approaches in respect to analysis and evaluation of think tanks and academic cen-ters. Publications of 2019-2020 were selected as examples of scientific research based on the criteria of the complexity of the analysis and the high level of their authors' experience in expert activity. Despite signifi-cant differences in the focus of the study, description of the algorithm and components of analytical activi-ty, scientists identify key problems of a scientific, political, administrative nature that create obstacles for experts to be able to follow the principles of honesty and objectivity. Experts have to make great efforts to fulfill their main mission - narrowing “a reasonable range of possible solutions”.

Author Biography

L. А. Fadeeva, Perm State University

Professor of Politics

References

Балаян, А. А., Сунгуров, А. Ю. (2016) Фабрики мысли и экспертные сообщества. Санкт-Петербург: Алетейя. 240 с. [Ba-layan, A., Sungurov, A. (2016) Think tanks and expert communities [Fabriki mysli I ekspertnye soobschestva]. St. Pe-tersburg, 240 p. (In Russ.)].

Бубнова, Н. В. (2019) Продвижение идей в общественно-политической науке: немного солнца в холодной воде. Москва: Политическая энциклопедия. 207 с. [Bubnova, N. I. (2019) Promotion of ideas in Social and Political Science: some sun in cold water [Prodvizhenie idei v obschestvenno-politicheskoi nauke: nemnogo solntsa v kholodnoi vode]. Moscow: Politicheskaya Entsiklopedia. (In Russ.)].

Бубнова, Н. И. (2017) ‘«Мозговые центры» как акторы международной политики’, Сравнительная политика, Т. 8, 3, cc. 8‒19. [Bubnova, N. I. (2017) ‘Think Tanks as an actors of world politics’ [Mozgovye tsentry kak aktory mezhdu-narodnji politiki], Sravnitel’naya politika, V. 8, 3, pp. 8‒19. (In Russ.)].

Косолапов, Н. (2003) ‘Политика, экспертиза, общество: узлы взаимозависимости’, Рro et Contra, Т. 8, 2, cc. 18–31. [Kosolapov, N. (2003) ‘Politics, expertise, society: interdependence nodes’ [Politika, ekspertiza, obschestvo: uzly vzaimozavi-simosti], Pro et Contra, V. 8, 2, pp. 18‒31. (In Russ.)].

Кара-Мурза, С. (2001) Экспертное сооб¬щество России: генезис и состояние. Москва: ИТРК, 80 с. [Kara-Murza, S. (2001) Ex-pert society of Russia: genesis and condi-tion [Ekspertnoe soobschestvo Rossii: genesis I sostoyanie]. Moscow: ITRK, 80 p. (In Russ.)].

Роль экспертно-аналитических сообществ в формировании общественной повестки дня в современной России (2017): сб. научн. тр. / отв. ред. Малинова О. Ю. Москва, 182 с. [The role of expert and analytical communities in shaping public agenda in modern Russia (2017) [Rol’ ek-spertno-analiticheskikh soobschestv v formirovanii obschestvenno-politicheskoi povestki dnia v sovremennoi Rossii]. Moscow: RAS. INION. Ed.by O. Malino-va, 182 p. (In Russ.)].

Сунгуров, А. Ю. (2020) Экспертные сообще-ства и власть. Москва: Политическая энциклопедия, 231 с. [Sungurov, A. Yu. (2020) Expert communities and power [Ekspertnye soobschestva I vlast’]. Mos-cow: Politicheskaya entsiklopedia, 231 p. (In Russ.)].

Сунгуров, А. Ю. (2002) ‘Российские фабрики мысли и Центры публичной политики: три примера’ в: «Фабрики мысли» и центры публичной политики: международный и первый российский опыт: сб. статей. Санкт-Петербург: Норма, сс. 116–138. URL: http://www.strategyspb.ru/index.php?do=biblio&doc=263. [Sungurov, A. Yu. (2002) ‘The Russian think tanks and Public policy centers: 3 cases’ [Rossiiski-ye fabriki mysli I tsentry publichnoi poli-tiki: tri primera] in: “Think tanks” and Public policy centers: international and the first Russian experience: Digest of ar-ticles [Rossiiskiye fabriki mysli I tsentry publichnoi politiki: mezhdunarodnyi I pervyi rossiiskii opyt: Sbornik statei]. St. Petersburg: Norma, pp. 116–138. (In Russ.)].

Сунгуров, А. Ю. (2015) Как возникают политические инновации: «фабрики мысли» и другие институты-медиаторы. Москва: Политическая энциклопедия, 383 с. [Sungurov, A.Yu. (2015) How political innovations come about: “think tanks” and the other media-tor institutions [Kak voznikayut politich-eskie innovatsii: “fabriki mysli” I drugie instituty-mediatory]. Moscow: Politich-eskaya entsiklopedia. (In Russ.)].

Экспертиза в социальном мире: от знания к деятельности (2006) / под ред. Г. В. Иванченко, Д. А. Леонтьева. Москва: Смысл. [Expertise in social world: from knowledge to activity [Ekspertiza v sotsi-al’nom mire: ot znaniya k aktivnosti]. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.)].

Boswell, C. (2009) The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and So-cial Research. Cambridge University Press

Stone, D., Denham, А. (eds.) (2004) Think Tank Traditions: Policy Analysis Across Na-tions; Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester Universi-ty Press.

Published

2021-10-19

How to Cite

Fadeeva Л. А. (2021). IT IS HARD TO BE AN EXPERT: NARROWING “A REASONABLE RANGE OF POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS”. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(3), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2021-3-97-102